The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Regardless of the language designed to elongate the point, the net result remains the same. You can't give your house away and expect to live in it for free with no comebacks.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:16 am
Has anyone else noticed the lack of discussion throughout all the analysis on television news programmes about the status of quangos in all the fuss over budget cuts/tax increases- or have I missed it?
It seems to me that certain Quangos are surefire candidates for shrinking or complete abolition if "tough" decisions are being made. Equalities Commission anyone? Arts Council? Regional enterprise councils? Regional Healthcare bodies?
What would your targets be for an early spending cut and why?
It seems to me that certain Quangos are surefire candidates for shrinking or complete abolition if "tough" decisions are being made. Equalities Commission anyone? Arts Council? Regional enterprise councils? Regional Healthcare bodies?
What would your targets be for an early spending cut and why?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
What would you replace them with?bedwetter2 wrote:Has anyone else noticed the lack of discussion throughout all the analysis on television news programmes about the status of quangos in all the fuss over budget cuts/tax increases- or have I missed it?
It seems to me that certain Quangos are surefire candidates for shrinking or complete abolition if "tough" decisions are being made. Equalities Commission anyone? Arts Council? Regional enterprise councils? Regional Healthcare bodies?
What would your targets be for an early spending cut and why?
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:16 am
I can state my views if you like but the purpose of the question was to determine whether people on this forum know what large budgets some of these bodies handle - make up your own mind whether they do so in an efficient or inefficient way. It may well be that the unelected boards of quangos are paragons of even-handedness whilst presiding over a very low cost of administering the monies they are provided with by this Government.
On the other hand perhaps many quangos are pointless, inefficient and riven with internal conflict. If so would the general public notice much difference if many quangos were consigned to history and not replaced with anything else at all funded by the public purse.
So Will the White, what do you know about quangos? Is the Lottery Commission politically influenced, for example?
On the other hand perhaps many quangos are pointless, inefficient and riven with internal conflict. If so would the general public notice much difference if many quangos were consigned to history and not replaced with anything else at all funded by the public purse.
So Will the White, what do you know about quangos? Is the Lottery Commission politically influenced, for example?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Not much - but is the argument about funding certain activities - such as the arts - or equalities - or regional health - or is it about whether quangos are the right way to do it? Best not to conflate the two, i think.bedwetter2 wrote:I can state my views if you like but the purpose of the question was to determine whether people on this forum know what large budgets some of these bodies handle - make up your own mind whether they do so in an efficient or inefficient way. It may well be that the unelected boards of quangos are paragons of even-handedness whilst presiding over a very low cost of administering the monies they are provided with by this Government.
On the other hand perhaps many quangos are pointless, inefficient and riven with internal conflict. If so would the general public notice much difference if many quangos were consigned to history and not replaced with anything else at all funded by the public purse.
So Will the White, what do you know about quangos? Is the Lottery Commission politically influenced, for example?
Any minute now we'll have Tango rambling on about bricks in the Tate...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Why? Has Tracy Emin taken up bricklaying now?William the White wrote:
Not much - but is the argument about funding certain activities - such as the arts - or equalities - or regional health - or is it about whether quangos are the right way to do it? Best not to conflate the two, i think.
Any minute now we'll have Tango rambling on about bricks in the Tate...

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34735
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
how many people are gonna stay up all night and watch the election unfold?
I quite like the look of Channel 4's offering as a warm up - with Jimmy Carr, Charlie Brooker and David Mitchell. Not that fussed about Carr - but the other two can be very amusing...
then it'll be the good old Beeb until the moment cameron is declared victor at which point I will down a large glass of scotch and go to bed for five years...
I quite like the look of Channel 4's offering as a warm up - with Jimmy Carr, Charlie Brooker and David Mitchell. Not that fussed about Carr - but the other two can be very amusing...
then it'll be the good old Beeb until the moment cameron is declared victor at which point I will down a large glass of scotch and go to bed for five years...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Sounds like a plan, Bish.thebish wrote:how many people are gonna stay up all night and watch the election unfold?
I quite like the look of Channel 4's offering as a warm up - with Jimmy Carr, Charlie Brooker and David Mitchell. Not that fussed about Carr - but the other two can be very amusing...
then it'll be the good old Beeb until the moment cameron is declared victor at which point I will down a large glass of scotch and go to bed for five years...
I still think it's very very close, and my prediction is that 'we' will gain enough Labour seats to get a majority, but then lose enough Lib/Cons marginals to ruin it.
Like you, I hope I'm wrong!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
OK Caps - what will the result be then? (so you can save us all from staying up)CAPSLOCK wrote:Watching the Election results would be like watching Rocky XXV
You know the winner before the opening credits roll
overall Tory majority
hung parliament with labour in second (in terms of seats)
hung parliament with labour in third (in terms of seats)
summat else
(maybe you're SirNuts supernatural Brian?)
I suspect the Clegg factor will burn away like morning mist and we will awake to a gurning cameron outside number 10mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Sounds like a plan, Bish.thebish wrote:how many people are gonna stay up all night and watch the election unfold?
I quite like the look of Channel 4's offering as a warm up - with Jimmy Carr, Charlie Brooker and David Mitchell. Not that fussed about Carr - but the other two can be very amusing...
then it'll be the good old Beeb until the moment cameron is declared victor at which point I will down a large glass of scotch and go to bed for five years...
I still think it's very very close, and my prediction is that 'we' will gain enough Labour seats to get a majority, but then lose enough Lib/Cons marginals to ruin it.
Like you, I hope I'm wrong!
(though - he'd best get inside pretty quick as I have heard him list over the years about 8 major things he is going to do on "day one"!)
the lib dems are specialists at false dawns!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Maybe, and I haven't been around the block as many times as you (:D), but my feeling is that it's different this time, and there's even a genuine prospect of the Lib Dems coming second in number of votes.thebish wrote:I suspect the Clegg factor will burn away like morning mist and we will awake to a gurning cameron outside number 10mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Sounds like a plan, Bish.thebish wrote:how many people are gonna stay up all night and watch the election unfold?
I quite like the look of Channel 4's offering as a warm up - with Jimmy Carr, Charlie Brooker and David Mitchell. Not that fussed about Carr - but the other two can be very amusing...
then it'll be the good old Beeb until the moment cameron is declared victor at which point I will down a large glass of scotch and go to bed for five years...
I still think it's very very close, and my prediction is that 'we' will gain enough Labour seats to get a majority, but then lose enough Lib/Cons marginals to ruin it.
Like you, I hope I'm wrong!
(though - he'd best get inside pretty quick as I have heard him list over the years about 8 major things he is going to do on "day one"!)
the lib dems are specialists at false dawns!
I'm not going to bet on that, but I'll bet you ten internet pounds that the Conservatives lose more seats to the Lib Dems than they gain from them.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Maybe, and I haven't been around the block as many times as you (:D), but my feeling is that it's different this time, and there's even a genuine prospect of the Lib Dems coming second in number of votes.
I'm not going to bet on that, but I'll bet you ten internet pounds that the Conservatives lose more seats to the Lib Dems than they gain from them.
hmmm... but the "second in number of votes" is a total irrelevance put about by the lib dems as if it means something. It shouldn't be - but it is. The system should be changed - but right now - it hasn't. so - it's number of seats however much they wish it to be otherwise - that will determine any hung-parliament power-play.
it's like wenger talking as if pretty-football somehow means Arsenal should have won the premiership title....
the lib dems have told us "this time it is different" at every election since the pope lost his virginity....
I'll believe it if/when I see it!
I'll not be taking you up on that - as mathematically that would always seem more likely with the fact that the tories hold hugely more seats than the lib dems and are therefore being challenged by lib dems in a lot more seats than lib dems are being challenged by tories...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: I'm not going to bet on that, but I'll bet you ten internet pounds that the Conservatives lose more seats to the Lib Dems than they gain from them.
Not sure why you chuck in 'in terms of seats' seeing as it's the only measure thats importantthebish wrote:OK Caps - what will the result be then? (so you can save us all from staying up)CAPSLOCK wrote:Watching the Election results would be like watching Rocky XXV
You know the winner before the opening credits roll
overall Tory majority
hung parliament with labour in second (in terms of seats)
hung parliament with labour in third (in terms of seats)
summat else
(maybe you're SirNuts supernatural Brian?)
Makes me smile a touch that many of those wanting reform would no doubt want to chuck in a rider that the BNP aren't allowed MPs
As for the result
1 Tories with overall majority
2 Labour
3 One of the minor parties, SDP, UKIP, BNP, PC...who cares
Sto ut Serviam
CAPSLOCK wrote:Not sure why you chuck in 'in terms of seats' seeing as it's the only measure thats importantthebish wrote:OK Caps - what will the result be then? (so you can save us all from staying up)CAPSLOCK wrote:Watching the Election results would be like watching Rocky XXV
You know the winner before the opening credits roll
overall Tory majority
hung parliament with labour in second (in terms of seats)
hung parliament with labour in third (in terms of seats)
summat else
(maybe you're SirNuts supernatural Brian?)
Makes me smile a touch that many of those wanting reform would no doubt want to chuck in a rider that the BNP aren't allowed MPs
As for the result
1 Tories with overall majority
2 Labour
3 One of the minor parties, SDP, UKIP, BNP, PC...who cares
I chucked it in to avoid confusion as plenty of lib dems are muddying the water by describing it as if it matters (you're right - it doesn't, as I pointed out above)
are you suggesting the SDP (whoever they are??) UKIP or BNP will get more seats than the liberal democrats?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Hmm, yes see. I've booked Friday off because I've got a chappie coming round from the estate agents. I know full well that I'll end up staying up all night watching it all unfurl and then sleeping through when the guy's outside knocking on the door.thebish wrote:how many people are gonna stay up all night and watch the election unfold?
May the bridges I burn light your way
You don't think Lib Dems will be in the top three?CAPSLOCK wrote:Not sure why you chuck in 'in terms of seats' seeing as it's the only measure thats importantthebish wrote:OK Caps - what will the result be then? (so you can save us all from staying up)CAPSLOCK wrote:Watching the Election results would be like watching Rocky XXV
You know the winner before the opening credits roll
overall Tory majority
hung parliament with labour in second (in terms of seats)
hung parliament with labour in third (in terms of seats)
summat else
(maybe you're SirNuts supernatural Brian?)
Makes me smile a touch that many of those wanting reform would no doubt want to chuck in a rider that the BNP aren't allowed MPs
As for the result
1 Tories with overall majority
2 Labour
3 One of the minor parties, SDP, UKIP, BNP, PC...who cares
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests