Today I'm angry about.....

TANGODANCER · Post by **TANGODANCER** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:27 am

Puskas wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:We're talking here like these people are human beings. All three should be inmates, not contemplating new lives.
They are human beings.
Cue the usual pompous, moronic, whining shite about how they don't deserve to be treated like it. Etc.

Well, maybe I should have added "normal" or "balanced" in there instead of assuming it was obvious, but if being just a bit pissed off at a racist thug and his moronic brother who treated a baby in this fashion - and a mother who claims she wasn't really aware of it all- is pompous, moronic, whining shite, then yeah, okay; I plead guilty.

InsaneApache · Post by **InsaneApache** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:07 am

I'm nearly fifty years old, a dad and a grandad. I have to say that everytime I read about that little lad and everything he endured I break into tears. I'm no softy either. The people who did this to him should stay in prison for the rest of their natural. If you compare the sentances they recieved compared with Biggs, it's clear that justice is indeed blind.

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:16 am

InsaneApache wrote:I'm nearly fifty years old, a dad and a grandad. I have to say that everytime I read about that little lad and everything he endured I break into tears. I'm no softy either. The people who did this to him should stay in prison for the rest of their natural. If you compare the sentances they recieved compared with Biggs, it's clear that justice is indeed blind.

Gruff justice?

InsaneApache · Post by **InsaneApache** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:22 am

Trying to ram home a point?

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab · Post by **KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:01 pm

Will you two stop aiming sheep shots at each other?

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:02 pm

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote:Will you two stop aiming sheep shots at each other?

I'm shore they will stop soon.

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:17 am

today I am angry about...

(ALL of which i have heard on t'radio this very morning)

The proof is in the pudding (no it fecking isn't!! The proof OF the pudding is IN the EATING you mongtard!)

Prostrate cancer (if someone is dying of a horrid disease - at least take the trouble to get it right!!! it's PROSTATE - no fecking "r")

Fine tooth-comb (there's no such fecking thing as a tooth-comb let alone a fine one - it's fecking fine-toothed comb you charlie)

ok I'm calm now....

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab · Post by **KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:23 am

thebish wrote:today I am angry about...

(ALL of which i have heard on t'radio this very morning)

The proof is in the pudding (no it fecking isn't!! The proof OF the putting is IN the EATING you mongtard!)

Prostrate cancer (if someone is dying of a horrid disease - at least take the trouble to get it right!!! it's PROSTATE - no fecking "r")

Fine tooth-comb (there's no such fecking thing as a tooth-comb let alone a fine one - it's fecking fine-toothed comb you charlie)

ok I'm calm now....

Isn't prostrate cancer an over-reactionary description of a lie-in?

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:29 am

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote:
thebish wrote:today I am angry about...

(ALL of which i have heard on t'radio this very morning)

The proof is in the pudding (no it fecking isn't!! The proof OF the putting is IN the EATING you mongtard!)

Prostrate cancer (if someone is dying of a horrid disease - at least take the trouble to get it right!!! it's PROSTATE - no fecking "r")

Fine tooth-comb (there's no such fecking thing as a tooth-comb let alone a fine one - it's fecking fine-toothed comb you charlie)

ok I'm calm now....
Isn't prostrate cancer an over-reactionary description of a lie-in?

I saw it here too the other day, in the woods near our house - they have gone to the trouble of having a sign designed and made and stuck it out on a post next to a bench - and they still get it wrong!! (neither does the wording on the sign make any meangful sense!)

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:32 am

English grammar seems to have passed by this signwriter!

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:34 am

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:English grammar seems to have passed by this signwriter!

I like the random fullstops - as if s/he was typing out a telegram!

Bruce Rioja · Post by **Bruce Rioja** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:41 am

thebish wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:English grammar seems to have passed by this signwriter!
I like the random fullstops - as if s/he was typing out a telegram!

I was actually wondering if they were nail heads.

Puskas · Post by **Puskas** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:43 pm

thebish wrote:today I am angry about...

(ALL of which i have heard on t'radio this very morning)

The proof is in the pudding (no it fecking isn't!! The proof OF the putting is IN the EATING you mongtard!)

Prostrate cancer (if someone is dying of a horrid disease - at least take the trouble to get it right!!! it's PROSTATE - no fecking "r")

Fine tooth-comb (there's no such fecking thing as a tooth-comb let alone a fine one - it's fecking fine-toothed comb you charlie)

ok I'm calm now....

Since the prostrate issue has been dealt with, I'd like to put forward the following two scenarios:

1) Outside the chippy.
Alphonse: "I believe this babbiesyed contains steak and kidney"
Britney: "A brave hypothesis - what convinces you?"
Alphonse: "Well the proof is in the pudding".

2) At the dentist
Clive: "You brush your teeth admirably, but possibly you should comb them, too"
Duncan: "But what with?"
Clive:"Here, use this tooth-comb. It's more effective than a toothbrush."
Duncan: "Goodness. What a fine tooth-comb".

Owt else?

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:47 pm

1. Tenderhooks when they mean tenterhooks.

2. "At this moment in time." That's simply now, you stupid bastard.

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:57 pm

Puskas wrote:
thebish wrote:today I am angry about...

(ALL of which i have heard on t'radio this very morning)

The proof is in the pudding (no it fecking isn't!! The proof OF the putting is IN the EATING you mongtard!)

Prostrate cancer (if someone is dying of a horrid disease - at least take the trouble to get it right!!! it's PROSTATE - no fecking "r")

Fine tooth-comb (there's no such fecking thing as a tooth-comb let alone a fine one - it's fecking fine-toothed comb you charlie)

ok I'm calm now....
Since the prostrate issue has been dealt with, I'd like to put forward the following two scenarios:

1) Outside the chippy.
Alphonse: "I believe this babbiesyed contains steak and kidney"
Britney: "A brave hypothesis - what convinces you?"
Alphonse: "Well the proof is in the pudding".

2) At the dentist
Clive: "You brush your teeth admirably, but possibly you should comb them, too"
Duncan: "But what with?"
Clive:"Here, use this tooth-comb. It's more effective than a toothbrush."
Duncan: "Goodness. What a fine tooth-comb".

Owt else?

thankyou puskas - the force of your reasoning hits me with the power of a nucular weapon, the anger has all dissipated and I am totally calm.

(nucular??? did someone say NUCULAR - AGAIN????? aggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!)

(oh - it was me)

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:00 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:1. Tenderhooks when they mean tenterhooks.

2. "At this moment in time." That's simply now, you stupid bastard.

"myself" - when they mean "me" - now utterly ingrained and almost universal - as if he word "me" has been banned.

(I heard a football player the other day say "the manager's talked to myself and we've went over the whole situation together."

on how many levels is it possible to be wrong in one sentence?

aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:48 pm

To be fair Bish, if it were on t'radio, they may have said 'fine-toothed comb', they're pretty hard to distinguish, speshally at your age

.

As for 'myself' and 'me', far worse is the same idea in the second person.

Waitress: Is everything OK for yourself there today sir for yourself.

WHAT?

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:49 pm

Today I'm angry about double standards. Folk whinging at Lokerbie bomber getting compassionate release when Ronnie Biggs got it, and they supported it, and who also laud Nelson Mandela as a hero.

superjohnmcginlay · Post by **superjohnmcginlay** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:51 pm

Prufrock wrote:Today I'm angry about double standards. Folk whinging at Lokerbie bomber getting compassionate release when Ronnie Biggs got it, and they supported it, and who also laud Nelson Mandela as a hero.

Not quite in the same league are they?

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:57 pm

superjohnmcginlay wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Today I'm angry about double standards. Folk whinging at Lokerbie bomber getting compassionate release when Ronnie Biggs got it, and they supported it, and who also laud Nelson Mandela as a hero.
Not quite in the same league are they?

No. But Nelson Mandela is, and he's a hero. Biggs is seen as some cheery chappy liek a film bank robber, when in reality he beat a train driver to within an inch of his life and left him permanently brain damaged, then skipped the country and has paid no where near his sentence. If we accept compassionate leave shouldn't be given to everyone, then he's a no.

Connect with your social network account

Today I'm angry about.....

Who is online