The Great Art Debate

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Harry Genshaw » Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:12 pm

bobo the clown wrote:Designed by Le Corbusier no less

Image
..and sold by Vance Miller
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:51 pm

Been looking at some works by an artist from India. Terrific watercolour artist with a very unfortunate name. Fortunately, he hasn't painted Reading to the best of my knowlege, although Dan may be disappointed. His name (I kid you not) is Vikram D. Shitole.. :D
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:10 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:Now, I happen to know that Bruce spent six hours in MOMA, and they had to throw him out 20 minutes after the official closing time, so enthusiastically was he enjoying the modern art in new York experience...

So far he has, predictably, posted 'modern art is a pile of shite' snippets.

So, what kept you in there until past closing time then? (is there a drumming fingers on desk smiley?)
It has a bar. ;)
Does it have any Picasso?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:51 pm

William the White wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:Now, I happen to know that Bruce spent six hours in MOMA, and they had to throw him out 20 minutes after the official closing time, so enthusiastically was he enjoying the modern art in new York experience...

So far he has, predictably, posted 'modern art is a pile of shite' snippets.

So, what kept you in there until past closing time then? (is there a drumming fingers on desk smiley?)
It has a bar. ;)
Does it have any Picasso?
A truly magnificent 1910, among others. ;)
May the bridges I burn light your way

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:56 pm

I went to Manchester Art Gallery this afternoon to catch this exhibition:

http://www.manchestergalleriestimemachine.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It is stunning in its scale, ambition, exuberance.

Unmissable for art lovers in the region. A joy. I was walking round with a huge grin on my face all afternoon.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:34 pm

I went to the Martin Creed exhibition today. Smiled all the way round. When I talk about Tate Modern being a grim and unrewarding place to take kids, this was the polar opposite.

What are adults to make of it? I've not read a review that hits the spot - and the misplaced earnestness of the catalogue certainly doesn't.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:59 am

Matisse Cut Outs at Tate Modern - brilliant, uplifting, life-affirming stuff. And all achieved when Matisse was older than Tango!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:08 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Matisse Cut Outs at Tate Modern - brilliant, uplifting, life-affirming stuff. And all achieved when Matisse was older than Tango!
He was 37?.... :shock: .

Actually thought about you yesterday. I watched and listened to a video
on Singer Sargent's watercolours. Lasted over an hour and was quite interesting except for the constant murdering of the words " wadder...and waddercolour by the two American females in the discussion.

You might find this interesting too: https://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/john-si ... atercolors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:31 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Matisse Cut Outs at Tate Modern - brilliant, uplifting, life-affirming stuff. And all achieved when Matisse was older than Tango!
He was 37?.... :shock: .

Actually thought about you yesterday. I watched and listened to a video
on Singer Sargent's watercolours. Lasted over an hour and was quite interesting except for the constant murdering of the words " wadder...and waddercolour by the two American females in the discussion.

You might find this interesting too: https://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/john-si ... atercolors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
He did achieve some amazing things with a medium which is not usually my thing, as you know.

I do think it makes a big difference to work with the 'opaque' watercolours that JSS used, as opposed to the ordinary translucent watercolours on their own.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:57 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Matisse Cut Outs at Tate Modern - brilliant, uplifting, life-affirming stuff. And all achieved when Matisse was older than Tango!
It is on our list to catch over summer.

Thinking of one of first 2 weekends in June and would like to catch your curated exhibition then. Are you about? :D

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:10 pm

William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Matisse Cut Outs at Tate Modern - brilliant, uplifting, life-affirming stuff. And all achieved when Matisse was older than Tango!
It is on our list to catch over summer.

Thinking of one of first 2 weekends in June and would like to catch your curated exhibition then. Are you about? :D
No plans to be away at the moment!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:23 pm

Three excellent finalists for the BP Portrait Award. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27065082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:26 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Three excellent finalists for the BP Portrait Award. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27065082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
L -R. 3 -2 -1.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:31 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Three excellent finalists for the BP Portrait Award. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27065082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I like the David Jon Kassan...

the homeless guy - I get that he says he is depicting him like a saint/nobleman - I presume he means in the narrow panels of a church triptych or summat similar... but as it is it is like those photos that look bad because they are badly cropped - the subject is trapped/cramped by the frame... it looks awkward to my eye...

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:51 pm

All have merit in different ways for me. Homeless guy well done but too clean, posed and cosy-looking, something you definitely wouldn't find in a homeless guy on the street. I can understand the equality concept, but the same could have applied more realistically.
The mother sentiment is nice in concept and sentiment, and skilled in execution. Probably the best by a stretch.
The other....nothing jumps out at me. Probably no better than many of the other entries.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:59 pm

thebish wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Three excellent finalists for the BP Portrait Award. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27065082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I like the David Jon Kassan...

the homeless guy - I get that he says he is depicting him like a saint/nobleman - I presume he means in the narrow panels of a church triptych or summat similar... but as it is it is like those photos that look bad because they are badly cropped - the subject is trapped/cramped by the frame... it looks awkward to my eye...
Yes - for me the homeless guy is the weakest one too. Interesting (if not totally original) idea, but I'm not sure about the execution - insofar as it's sensible to pass comment on that given the tiny picture.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:28 pm

I'm having trouble with the whole homeless guy idea. I think the artist has created a bit of a bear trap. Is he just showing the man in a heavenly version of equality, ie a better quality blanket, new anorak and a hot coup of coffee, but still a homeless guy rather than a total equal to all others? Some equality there I think not.

In that light, I don't see the equality idea at all, or the concept even. Painting a homeless man as a subject, great, but surely inspired by what the artist saw initially, a homeless man in poverty. Why not paint that, maybe in half portrait showing the weariness and suffering of the man in his own environ? To be equal to others doesn't mean getting a better cardboard box, surely?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:34 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:I'm having trouble with the whole homeless guy idea. I think the artist has created a bit of a bear trap. Is he just showing the man in a heavenly version of equality, ie a better quality blanket, new anorak and a hot coup of coffee, but still a homeless guy rather than a total equal to all others? Some equality there I think not.

In that light, I don't see the equality idea at all, or the concept even. Painting a homeless man as a subject, great, but surely inspired by what the artist saw initially, a homeless man in poverty. Why not paint that, maybe in half portrait showing the weariness and suffering of the man in his own environ? To be equal to others doesn't mean getting a better cardboard box, surely?

I don't think he's going for an idea of "equality" or a homeless guy being a total equal of anyone... I may be wrong, but I haven't seen the artist say that anywhere.

what he says he's done (in the short description that mummy links to) is say that he wants to portray the guy as deserving of respect and care... he doesn't say exactly how he has tried to portray that - but that's what he says he's trying to do...

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:15 pm

Agreed - I don't think it's about 'equality' - just a nudge to 'look again' at a person you might ordinarily ignore, because your eye has (or may have) been tricked into recognising the visual language of the Byzantine icon.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:53 pm

Mummy said:
Agreed - I don't think it's about 'equality' - just a nudge to 'look again' at a person you might ordinarily ignore, because your eye has (or may have) been tricked into recognising the visual language of the Byzantine icon.
Oh dear. Byzantine icons is it? Fair enough then. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests