The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I think that's the allusion, putting his head against a gold background like that.TANGODANCER wrote:Mummy said:
Oh dear. Byzantine icons is it? Fair enough then.Agreed - I don't think it's about 'equality' - just a nudge to 'look again' at a person you might ordinarily ignore, because your eye has (or may have) been tricked into recognising the visual language of the Byzantine icon.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Then again, it could be a background of bed springs stuck up in front of yellow curtains. 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: The Great Art Debate
no idea - but it's possible it is a wink to the prominence of the rose in christian iconography - often (though not exclusively) in catholic circles to symbolise Mary or things about Mary... putting it in a coffee cup might continue the theme of the spiritual in the ordinary...Bruce Rioja wrote:Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
just a guess...
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Maybe just a guess, Bish, but one that makes perfect sense given the context explained by PB. Thanks.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I thought that was a cup of coffee with a rose in it. On closer looking, might be wrong, but I think it's a rose in a coffee cup of soil.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's funny - if anything I thought the icon reference was a bit 'obvious'!TANGODANCER wrote:Then again, it could be a background of bed springs stuck up in front of yellow curtains.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Or the spiritual in place of the material - i.e. the money that homeless people usually want in their empty coffee cups. The image is too low quality to zoom in, but I think the cup might just be empty but for shadow (and the rose).thebish wrote:no idea - but it's possible it is a wink to the prominence of the rose in christian iconography - often (though not exclusively) in catholic circles to symbolise Mary or things about Mary... putting it in a coffee cup might continue the theme of the spiritual in the ordinary...Bruce Rioja wrote:Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
just a guess...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
I am sure you are correct, Tango. The Guardian has a much higher resolution image if you click on the magnifying glass in the bottom right hand corner. It is not liquid in that cup and it is not empty, PB.TANGODANCER wrote:I thought that was a cup of coffee with a rose in it. On closer looking, might be wrong, but I think it's a rose in a coffee cup of soil.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Ah, yes - in fact, now I am on my laptop rather than my phone, I realise it was obvious on the other picture anyway.
That's a much better picture of the face, too.
That's a much better picture of the face, too.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
In Ottoman Art the rose is a reference to the prophet - or so we were told at the artists' collective in Istanbul. The rose was created from a tear shed by Mohammed when he went on his journey to Paradise. I'm not sure how accurate this is, horticulturally speaking...
I do like the portrait a lot, though, which works against all 'normal' depictions of the street dweller - neither villain nor victim, evoking not, fear not anger, not contempt and not pity either. A man in repose. Calm as he gazes back at us.
What size is this portrait, mummy, do you know? Russian icon size?
I do like the portrait a lot, though, which works against all 'normal' depictions of the street dweller - neither villain nor victim, evoking not, fear not anger, not contempt and not pity either. A man in repose. Calm as he gazes back at us.
What size is this portrait, mummy, do you know? Russian icon size?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
And the rose is an artificial rose as well. Is this a flower in his 'home'?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
Oh, and i just checked - the red rose was created from a drop of the prophet's perspiration, not a tear... Clearly a warm day in paradise...
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
In Hinduism Vishnu's wife Lakshmi was created from rose petals, while in Greek mythology Aphrodite created the rose (Adonis's blood made the red rose). The Persian myth was that the nightingale was enamored of the white rose that it flew down and impaled itself on the thorns, thus creating the red rose. All this stuff predates the prophet and renders his sweat claim questionable. But who knows - there are many varieties of red rose.William the White wrote:And the rose is an artificial rose as well. Is this a flower in his 'home'?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
Oh, and i just checked - the red rose was created from a drop of the prophet's perspiration, not a tear... Clearly a warm day in paradise...
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.
It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
And which slideshow might this be then?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.
It's image number 8 in this slideshow.

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/galleries/p01hsnm8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Bruce Rioja wrote:And which slideshow might this be then?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.
It's image number 8 in this slideshow.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
That's a bit bleak isn't it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/galleries/p01hsnm8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Bruce Rioja wrote:And which slideshow might this be then?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.
It's image number 8 in this slideshow.

I'll have a good look at them all later. Cheers.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Yes sir - and so are the two first edition Goya 'Disasters of War' etchings I've got too.Bruce Rioja wrote:That's a bit bleak isn't it?
War tends to be 'a bit bleak'!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests