The Great Art Debate

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:55 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Mummy said:
Agreed - I don't think it's about 'equality' - just a nudge to 'look again' at a person you might ordinarily ignore, because your eye has (or may have) been tricked into recognising the visual language of the Byzantine icon.
Oh dear. Byzantine icons is it? Fair enough then. :wink:
I think that's the allusion, putting his head against a gold background like that.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Wed Apr 23, 2014 5:11 pm

icon of Peter...

Image

you can see the stylistic similarities - not least - attention to face and hands...

Image

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Apr 23, 2014 6:33 pm

Then again, it could be a background of bed springs stuck up in front of yellow curtains. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:33 pm

Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by thebish » Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:47 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
no idea - but it's possible it is a wink to the prominence of the rose in christian iconography - often (though not exclusively) in catholic circles to symbolise Mary or things about Mary... putting it in a coffee cup might continue the theme of the spiritual in the ordinary...

just a guess...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:12 pm

Maybe just a guess, Bish, but one that makes perfect sense given the context explained by PB. Thanks.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:18 pm

I thought that was a cup of coffee with a rose in it. On closer looking, might be wrong, but I think it's a rose in a coffee cup of soil.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:31 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Then again, it could be a background of bed springs stuck up in front of yellow curtains. :wink:
It's funny - if anything I thought the icon reference was a bit 'obvious'!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:40 pm

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Anyone have any ideas regarding the significance (or other) of the rose in the cup of coffee?
no idea - but it's possible it is a wink to the prominence of the rose in christian iconography - often (though not exclusively) in catholic circles to symbolise Mary or things about Mary... putting it in a coffee cup might continue the theme of the spiritual in the ordinary...

just a guess...
Or the spiritual in place of the material - i.e. the money that homeless people usually want in their empty coffee cups. The image is too low quality to zoom in, but I think the cup might just be empty but for shadow (and the rose).
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:56 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:I thought that was a cup of coffee with a rose in it. On closer looking, might be wrong, but I think it's a rose in a coffee cup of soil.
I am sure you are correct, Tango. The Guardian has a much higher resolution image if you click on the magnifying glass in the bottom right hand corner. It is not liquid in that cup and it is not empty, PB.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:02 pm

Ah, yes - in fact, now I am on my laptop rather than my phone, I realise it was obvious on the other picture anyway.

That's a much better picture of the face, too.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:10 pm

In Ottoman Art the rose is a reference to the prophet - or so we were told at the artists' collective in Istanbul. The rose was created from a tear shed by Mohammed when he went on his journey to Paradise. I'm not sure how accurate this is, horticulturally speaking...

I do like the portrait a lot, though, which works against all 'normal' depictions of the street dweller - neither villain nor victim, evoking not, fear not anger, not contempt and not pity either. A man in repose. Calm as he gazes back at us.

What size is this portrait, mummy, do you know? Russian icon size?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:27 pm

The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:33 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
And the rose is an artificial rose as well. Is this a flower in his 'home'?

Oh, and i just checked - the red rose was created from a drop of the prophet's perspiration, not a tear... Clearly a warm day in paradise...

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:02 am

William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:The entire painting is 160cm x 60cm, so a bit bigger. http://www.thepalettepages.com/2014/04/18/bpawards/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That probably leaves the gold portion around 'icon size' though?
And the rose is an artificial rose as well. Is this a flower in his 'home'?

Oh, and i just checked - the red rose was created from a drop of the prophet's perspiration, not a tear... Clearly a warm day in paradise...
In Hinduism Vishnu's wife Lakshmi was created from rose petals, while in Greek mythology Aphrodite created the rose (Adonis's blood made the red rose). The Persian myth was that the nightingale was enamored of the white rose that it flew down and impaled itself on the thorns, thus creating the red rose. All this stuff predates the prophet and renders his sweat claim questionable. But who knows - there are many varieties of red rose.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:24 pm

Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.

It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:35 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.

It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
And which slideshow might this be then? :conf:
May the bridges I burn light your way

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:47 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.

It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
And which slideshow might this be then? :conf:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/galleries/p01hsnm8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:oops:
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:57 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Today I am beyond thrilled to have secured the loan of a drawing by George Grosz to the exhibition I am curating at the law firm I work at.

It's image number 8 in this slideshow.
And which slideshow might this be then? :conf:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/galleries/p01hsnm8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:oops:
That's a bit bleak isn't it? :shock:

I'll have a good look at them all later. Cheers.
May the bridges I burn light your way

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:13 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:That's a bit bleak isn't it? :shock:
Yes sir - and so are the two first edition Goya 'Disasters of War' etchings I've got too.

War tends to be 'a bit bleak'!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests