Today I'm angry about.....
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Naaaah... i used to go to sleep with R5, but this arse's whining is ruining that option... Send him back to his Belfast station...jimbo wrote:The man needs to be sent back to his little late night studio when he can whine on to his hearts content.William the White wrote:Photo-finish...Bruce Rioja wrote:I'm not sure I've heard a great deal of his stuff. Surely he can't be as skin-crawling as Jeremy Vine?William the White wrote:He is a 100% jerk, beats me why he's allowed to crawl all over R5's schedule whenever anyone is on holiday...thebish wrote:ARSE!!
despite reappearing last night - stephen Nolan is STILL on r5 during the day....
Hasn't he been doing the late night thing for years? I've just got back from 10 weeks away to find him all over the daytime's though. Guessing he'll be moving back when people are back from hols?William the White wrote:Naaaah... i used to go to sleep with R5, but this arse's whining is ruining that option... Send him back to his Belfast station...jimbo wrote:The man needs to be sent back to his little late night studio when he can whine on to his hearts content.William the White wrote:Photo-finish...Bruce Rioja wrote:I'm not sure I've heard a great deal of his stuff. Surely he can't be as skin-crawling as Jeremy Vine?William the White wrote: He is a 100% jerk, beats me why he's allowed to crawl all over R5's schedule whenever anyone is on holiday...
- Little Green Man
- Icon
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Justin Edinburgh
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
He's 25 stone... odious monstrous shit is fine...Little Green Man wrote:And get the odious little shit to take Alan Green, Eamonn Holmes and Colin Murray with him.William the White wrote: Naaaah... i used to go to sleep with R5, but this arse's whining is ruining that option... Send him back to his Belfast station...
- Little Green Man
- Icon
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Justin Edinburgh
Unfortunately I have seen pictures of the twunt. I suppose I used little to conjure up the magnitude of his broadcasting prowess.William the White wrote:He's 25 stone... odious monstrous shit is fine...Little Green Man wrote:And get the odious little shit to take Alan Green, Eamonn Holmes and Colin Murray with him.William the White wrote: Naaaah... i used to go to sleep with R5, but this arse's whining is ruining that option... Send him back to his Belfast station...
here he is...
back at the end of 2008....
BBC presenter Stephen Nolan issued a live on-air apology yesterday after asking whether the victims of human sex trafficking enjoyed their work.
The TV and radio star caused outrage for his remarks made during an interview with a spokesperson from human rights group Amnesty International about the international sex trade in young girls and women.
Amnesty's Fiona Smith had been explaining to the presenter how human trafficking was big business throughout Northern Ireland and the UK in general.
She said victims were arriving at the UK's borders where they were being “auctioned off at airports” for a lifetime of misery.
However, she was taken aback when the presenter, speaking on his BBC Radio Ulster Nolan show, asked her:
“Would you not say that these girls enjoy the sex?” She told him that the victims of human trafficking had to endure being raped multiple times a day because they had not consented to sex and were being used as slaves.
“Many of these women are from Africa, south east Asia and eastern Europe and they are very traumatised after being raped many times a day,” Ms Smith said.
She was speaking following a police operation in Belfast last week in which two victims of human sex trafficking were rescued.
Nolan later apologised for his remarks as it emerged that listeners had complained to the BBC about his comments.
He said: “I got confused earlier in the show when I asked if these women ever enjoy their job and if they enjoy the sex.
“Of course they don't enjoy if if it is forced upon them and I just want to say sorry.”
back at the end of 2008....
BBC presenter Stephen Nolan issued a live on-air apology yesterday after asking whether the victims of human sex trafficking enjoyed their work.
The TV and radio star caused outrage for his remarks made during an interview with a spokesperson from human rights group Amnesty International about the international sex trade in young girls and women.
Amnesty's Fiona Smith had been explaining to the presenter how human trafficking was big business throughout Northern Ireland and the UK in general.
She said victims were arriving at the UK's borders where they were being “auctioned off at airports” for a lifetime of misery.
However, she was taken aback when the presenter, speaking on his BBC Radio Ulster Nolan show, asked her:
“Would you not say that these girls enjoy the sex?” She told him that the victims of human trafficking had to endure being raped multiple times a day because they had not consented to sex and were being used as slaves.
“Many of these women are from Africa, south east Asia and eastern Europe and they are very traumatised after being raped many times a day,” Ms Smith said.
She was speaking following a police operation in Belfast last week in which two victims of human sex trafficking were rescued.
Nolan later apologised for his remarks as it emerged that listeners had complained to the BBC about his comments.
He said: “I got confused earlier in the show when I asked if these women ever enjoy their job and if they enjoy the sex.
“Of course they don't enjoy if if it is forced upon them and I just want to say sorry.”
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Dear God. He actually asked that?thebish wrote:
However, she was taken aback when the presenter, speaking on his BBC Radio Ulster Nolan show, asked her:
“Would you not say that these girls enjoy the sex?”
Now I don't get involved in kicking-up-a-stink at stuff, but how come there hasn't been a greater furore over this than there was when Brand and Ross upset Manuel?
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1163
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Up, around the bend...
Indeed. Jesus tonight. Worse....his defense! I meant to ask not if they enjoy the sex, but if they enjoy the job. Oh right yeah. The getting raped a lot and sold into sex slavery is a bit shit, but I haven't a bad word to say about the pension schemeBruce Rioja wrote:Dear God. He actually asked that?thebish wrote:
However, she was taken aback when the presenter, speaking on his BBC Radio Ulster Nolan show, asked her:
“Would you not say that these girls enjoy the sex?”
Now I don't get involved in kicking-up-a-stink at stuff, but how come there hasn't been a greater furore over this than there was when Brand and Ross upset Manuel?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making nice person everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
I've seen little and read little of Dawkins' work, Crayons, but the wee bit I have met up with gave me the impression that he's a pretentious prig. Please don't ask me how, why and when as I cannot answer; it's an impression - you know the sort of thing - when his name is mentioned and my brain connects with the appropriate body-in-question my subconscious instantly pops up "Oh, that Richard Dawkins!"
that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Rossendale
Great guy imo. Anyone who takes on the Blairs Bubkas and Sharia apologists of this world and their pedling of Intelligent Design over Evolution is to be applauded.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
I got a sickness, sweet as a love note,
I got a headache, like a pillow.
L Dopa fixed me, all right
I got a headache, like a pillow.
L Dopa fixed me, all right
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32759
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Just imagine being instructed "how to live your life", by a bloke that's rarely been outside the confines of a University establishment. I think not.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
To what end though, when he does it in that style, BGOE?Big_Girl_Oral_Explosion wrote:Great guy imo. Anyone who takes on the Blairs Bubkas and Sharia apologists of this world and their pedling of Intelligent Design over Evolution is to be applauded.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
I didn't vote for Cameron and his lot eitherWorthy4England wrote:Just imagine being instructed "how to live your life", by a bloke that's rarely been outside the confines of a University establishment. I think not.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
The Mail and the kind of people who'll complain about something they haven't watched/heard/read decided not to stick their nose in, probably because it wasn't two blokes they 'didn't like' to start with. That whole episode made me realise that as the population gets older, the more they're going to complain about everything, regardless of whether it affects them or not. Andrew Sachs himself couldn't believe the attention it received, along with the rest of us under 40.Bruce Rioja wrote:Dear God. He actually asked that?thebish wrote:
However, she was taken aback when the presenter, speaking on his BBC Radio Ulster Nolan show, asked her:
“Would you not say that these girls enjoy the sex?”
Now I don't get involved in kicking-up-a-stink at stuff, but how come there hasn't been a greater furore over this than there was when Brand and Ross upset Manuel?
Anyway, Nolan is a t*t.
Troll and proud of it.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
'Ey, Mummy & Pru ... he's having a pop at you here.Worthy4England wrote:Just imagine being instructed "how to live your life", by a bloke that's rarely been outside the confines of a University establishment. I think not.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32759
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Stirrer.bobo the clown wrote:'Ey, Mummy & Pru ... he's having a pop at you here.Worthy4England wrote:Just imagine being instructed "how to live your life", by a bloke that's rarely been outside the confines of a University establishment. I think not.thebish wrote:that's because he is as bigoted and narrow-minded as the narrow-minded bigots he likes to taunt...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Where did it all go wrong for Richard Dawkins? He was revered by so many of us for 'The Selfish Gene', and I admit that I quite enjoyed his mutually-masturbatory-atheist-scribblings in my slightly more impressionable days, but he comes across as an irritating, trouble-making tw*t everytime he appears on TV these days.
The adverts for his latest series are a joke.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43357
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Much like my claim that all judges should live at least two years on a housing estate before dispensing justice on criminals. Book learning and the idea that all people are going to see and behave reasonably is fine in an ideal world. Pity we don't live in one.Worthy4England wrote: Just imagine being instructed "how to live your life", by a bloke that's rarely been outside the confines of a University establishment. I think not.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 86 guests