The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Why's someone stuck a massive dildo to the mantle piece?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
My guess is a wall clock or cuckoo clock with chains on a backboard.Bruce Rioja wrote:Why's someone stuck a massive dildo to the mantle piece?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
if it were shadows, that would surely darken the brown of the mantelpiece, wouldn't it? ...not overlay with a totally different colour...TANGODANCER wrote:Not sure just what the right hand side says apart from a settee of sorts and some big shadows bobo. If you look at the blue and black bit far left, it's a man reading a newspaper with the shadow of his legs thrown on the wall extreme left. Going off the shadows the light is from a central source and suggests interior light rather than sunlight. The right, I just don't know, shadows I'd say?bobo the clown wrote:^^^ why is there a ghost of a huge person sitting in a huge armchair, with it's back to the fire to the right of that Tango ?
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
One of the most haunted places in England, I understand.
Of course Whistler may have painted a different one - at York perhaps.
Of course Whistler may have painted a different one - at York perhaps.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: The Great Art Debate
^ that may well be, but it's not Moresby Hall that Whistler painted... it's Moreby (as Tango said)
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Simple answer is I just don't know. It was painted late Victorian era (1883-4) and playing music being a part of the culture, I'm seeing something that might be a harp to the right of the fire, then what might be a settee. I can't find any info anywhere on the painting so, I suppose you see it as you see it and use your imagination? .thebish wrote:if it were shadows, that would surely darken the brown of the mantelpiece, wouldn't it? ...not overlay with a totally different colour...TANGODANCER wrote:Not sure just what the right hand side says apart from a settee of sorts and some big shadows bobo. If you look at the blue and black bit far left, it's a man reading a newspaper with the shadow of his legs thrown on the wall extreme left. Going off the shadows the light is from a central source and suggests interior light rather than sunlight. The right, I just don't know, shadows I'd say?bobo the clown wrote:^^^ why is there a ghost of a huge person sitting in a huge armchair, with it's back to the fire to the right of that Tango ?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
ghost of a huge person it is then - as Bobo said!TANGODANCER wrote:Simple answer is I just don't know. It was painted late Victorian era (1883-4) and playing music being a part of the culture, I'm seeing something that might be a harp to the right of the fire, then what might be a settee. I can't find any info anywhere on the painting so, I suppose you see it as you see it and use your imagination? .thebish wrote:if it were shadows, that would surely darken the brown of the mantelpiece, wouldn't it? ...not overlay with a totally different colour...TANGODANCER wrote:Not sure just what the right hand side says apart from a settee of sorts and some big shadows bobo. If you look at the blue and black bit far left, it's a man reading a newspaper with the shadow of his legs thrown on the wall extreme left. Going off the shadows the light is from a central source and suggests interior light rather than sunlight. The right, I just don't know, shadows I'd say?bobo the clown wrote:^^^ why is there a ghost of a huge person sitting in a huge armchair, with it's back to the fire to the right of that Tango ?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Been pondering on this and I reckon the big shape is a piano/organ, pianoforte? with possibly a vase stood on its top. Makes sense with the harp and if there's a window where we're looking from a lot of light could cast plenty shadow.....Disclaimer...artistic licence at work..
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
is that a dog just on the left of the foreground - rubbing itself on the side of a sofa?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I can see where you mean, in front of the chair, and it's quite possible.thebish wrote:is that a dog just on the left of the foreground - rubbing itself on the side of a sofa?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
of course - it could always be bobo rubbing himself on the sofa...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
See, that's the sort of question we need to ask about art. None of this namby pamby bllks.Bruce Rioja wrote:Why's someone stuck a massive dildo to the mantle piece?
So when you saw a massive dildo in the painting, how did it make you feel? What emotions did it stir? What did the dildo say to you? Did you stare at it for hours, trying to work out where the dildo had been and what the back-story was? I think we need to know.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'm reaslly hoping bruce doesn't answerWorthy4England wrote:See, that's the sort of question we need to ask about art. None of this namby pamby bllks.Bruce Rioja wrote:Why's someone stuck a massive dildo to the mantle piece?
So when you saw a massive dildo in the painting, how did it make you feel? What emotions did it stir? What did the dildo say to you? Did you stare at it for hours, trying to work out where the dildo had been and what the back-story was? I think we need to know.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32756
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
William the White wrote:I'm reaslly hoping bruce doesn't answerWorthy4England wrote:See, that's the sort of question we need to ask about art. None of this namby pamby bllks.Bruce Rioja wrote:Why's someone stuck a massive dildo to the mantle piece?
So when you saw a massive dildo in the painting, how did it make you feel? What emotions did it stir? What did the dildo say to you? Did you stare at it for hours, trying to work out where the dildo had been and what the back-story was? I think we need to know.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:01 am
Re: The Great Art Debate
I know this thread is called The Great Art Debate, but the following is not put forward for debate. These people are morons. End of.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-29446232
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-29446232
Re: The Great Art Debate
Dear lord!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
It is not even clear to me whether the complaint came from a UKIP type offended by the brilliant satire, or an Anti-UKIP type who just didn't get it.EverSoYouri wrote:I know this thread is called The Great Art Debate, but the following is not put forward for debate. These people are morons. End of.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-29446232
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43356
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Council officials rarely know much about life at street level. Anyone with half a brain would have just ignored it as petty attention seeking, probably by a serial complainer. Instead, they have a meeting and action the complaint to the joy of all....not.Montreal Wanderer wrote:It is not even clear to me whether the complaint came from a UKIP type offended by the brilliant satire, or an Anti-UKIP type who just didn't get it.EverSoYouri wrote:I know this thread is called The Great Art Debate, but the following is not put forward for debate. These people are morons. End of.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-29446232
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
I have known (and know) lots of local councillors - it is pretty much a totally thankless task... in my experience, they are most often those who DO know and care about life at street level in the communities they serve. It takes quite a bit to put your head above the parapet and campaign for support to be a local councillor in the area you live. I'm sorry your experience of them seems to be so overwhelmingly negative, without them - those willing to put the time into local government - our lives would be immeasurably shitter...TANGODANCER wrote:
Council officials rarely know much about life at street level.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14101
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Great Art Debate
Had anybody else posted that, you wouldn't have responded
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests