The Politics Thread

[bedwetter2]

how to be a tit - lesson 68

1. get involved in summat you don't understand
2. staggeringly miss the point
3. make a total tit of yourself
4. pretend you didn't mean it anyway and it was all a big joke

Interesting views there, old chap, but somewhat wide of the mark.

Why state that I don't understand the rationale behind the poll? You really do take yourself a little too seriously.

And so I take it that lesson 69 involves men of the cloth - presuming you are not one of those new-fangled female GBs - developing a sense of humour. In the meantime, if I can assist you in that direction there will no doubt be other opportunities afforded to me in taking the piss. Politics, religion, sex and the easily offended are all fertile ground for me.

I'm obviously missing something here. Could you point me to which of your posts show you have a sense of humour?

Oh dear.

[thebish]

it was just general advice bedwetter - I didn't mention you...

but you seem to think the cap fits for some reason...

Why aren't you at evensong?

because I don't go to evensong. why aren't you at evensong?

(if you do go - take the cap off on the way in - still a nice fit I see)

[bedwetter2]

it was just general advice bedwetter - I didn't mention you...

but you seem to think the cap fits for some reason...

Why aren't you at evensong?

because I don't go to evensong. why aren't you at evensong?

(if you do go - take the cap off on the way in - still a nice fit I see)

Now that would be against my lack of religion.

[thebish]

it was just general advice bedwetter - I didn't mention you...

but you seem to think the cap fits for some reason...

Why aren't you at evensong?

because I don't go to evensong. why aren't you at evensong?

(if you do go - take the cap off on the way in - still a nice fit I see)

Now that would be against my lack of religion.

glad we cleared that up - remind me why you asked?

[2399]

Most of the independent MPs have put their support with Labor and so Julia Gillard is elected Prime Minister.

Labor - 76 seats
Coalition - 74 seats

[bedwetter2]

it was just general advice bedwetter - I didn't mention you...

but you seem to think the cap fits for some reason...

Why aren't you at evensong?

because I don't go to evensong. why aren't you at evensong?

(if you do go - take the cap off on the way in - still a nice fit I see)

Now that would be against my lack of religion.

glad we cleared that up - remind me why you asked?

Alzheimers is a bugger ain't it?
Could the reason I asked have something to do with your username, your clerical attire or your holier than thou attitude?

[thebish]

Why aren't you at evensong?

because I don't go to evensong. why aren't you at evensong?

(if you do go - take the cap off on the way in - still a nice fit I see)

Now that would be against my lack of religion.

glad we cleared that up - remind me why you asked?

Alzheimers is a bugger ain't it?
Could the reason I asked have something to do with your username, your clerical attire or your holier than thou attitude?

my damp-sheeted comrade...

I set up a poll that several people have completed and several people commented on and several people visited.

for some bizarre reason you used said poll as an opportunity to rant about shooting socialists and describe CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

when questioned and challenged you divert into a bizarre non-sequiteur about me being at evensong....

you suggest that such a diversion was obvious because of my username, my clerical attire and my holier than thou attitude.

1. I can only conclude that if usernames are accurate descriptions - then you do actually wet the bed
2. You know nothing of my clerical attire - nor whether or not I own any - let alone wear any.
3. on what issue/point do you imagine I have expressed the idea that I am "holier" than you - specifically? what does that even mean?

[InsaneApache]

Well I am quite red and possibly barmy.

[Gravedigger]

Well I am quite red and possibly barmy.

Me too. Without the make up of course.

[bedwetter2]

my damp-sheeted comrade...

I set up a poll that several people have completed and several people commented on and several people visited.

for some bizarre reason you used said poll as an opportunity to rant about shooting socialists and describe CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

when questioned and challenged you divert into a bizarre non-sequiteur about me being at evensong....

you suggest that such a diversion was obvious because of my username, my clerical attire and my holier than thou attitude.

1. I can only conclude that if usernames are accurate descriptions - then you do actually wet the bed
2. You know nothing of my clerical attire - nor whether or not I own any - let alone wear any.
3. on what issue/point do you imagine I have expressed the idea that I am "holier" than you - specifically? what does that even mean?

Rant? Rant?
Perhaps humour doesn't come across on internet forums, but rant?

Now please correct me if I'm wrong, as I am sure you will, but not once did I describe the sainted CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

Bizarre non-sequiteur? Whilst it may be a stretch for you to grasp, the evensong reference was a tenuous light-hearted link to your username, lifelike portrait alongside and the time of day at which the post was made.
It also followed that if you really were a man of the church, then you would be holier than me by some distance. Simples.

Of course I realise that you are really a fat, hairy spinster surrounded by cats and religious texts, your surname being Bishop with perhaps a forename of Emily, and that you are no more connected with the anglican church than Richard Dawkins. As you say, you may or may not own and/or wear clerical attire and that of course is your business when in the privacy of your own palace.

Only one thing disappoints me in your responses. It is unfair for you to single out my username for attention and ridicule when it is the result of a serious and incurable medical condition. At other times, in waking hours, I must carry buckets and jerrycans around to catch the excess micturation. It's not easy taking the piss all the time.

[thebish]

my damp-sheeted comrade...

I set up a poll that several people have completed and several people commented on and several people visited.

for some bizarre reason you used said poll as an opportunity to rant about shooting socialists and describe CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

when questioned and challenged you divert into a bizarre non-sequiteur about me being at evensong....

you suggest that such a diversion was obvious because of my username, my clerical attire and my holier than thou attitude.

1. I can only conclude that if usernames are accurate descriptions - then you do actually wet the bed
2. You know nothing of my clerical attire - nor whether or not I own any - let alone wear any.
3. on what issue/point do you imagine I have expressed the idea that I am "holier" than you - specifically? what does that even mean?

Rant? Rant?
Perhaps humour doesn't come across on internet forums, but rant?

Now please correct me if I'm wrong, as I am sure you will, but not once did I describe the sainted CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

I'd be happy to...

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

see above.

It also followed that if you really were a man of the church, then you would be holier than me by some distance.

that would depend on what you mean by "holy". I don't think that even begins to follow.

Of course I realise that you are really a fat, hairy spinster surrounded by cats and religious texts, your surname being Bishop with perhaps a forename of Emily, and that you are no more connected with the anglican church than Richard Dawkins.

you're right - I have no connection at all to the anglican church - and hence - no connection at all to "evensong".

[bedwetter2]

my damp-sheeted comrade...

I set up a poll that several people have completed and several people commented on and several people visited.

for some bizarre reason you used said poll as an opportunity to rant about shooting socialists and describe CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

when questioned and challenged you divert into a bizarre non-sequiteur about me being at evensong....

you suggest that such a diversion was obvious because of my username, my clerical attire and my holier than thou attitude.

1. I can only conclude that if usernames are accurate descriptions - then you do actually wet the bed
2. You know nothing of my clerical attire - nor whether or not I own any - let alone wear any.
3. on what issue/point do you imagine I have expressed the idea that I am "holier" than you - specifically? what does that even mean?

Rant? Rant?
Perhaps humour doesn't come across on internet forums, but rant?

Now please correct me if I'm wrong, as I am sure you will, but not once did I describe the sainted CAPS and Bruce as wankers.

I'd be happy to...

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

see above.

It also followed that if you really were a man of the church, then you would be holier than me by some distance.

that would depend on what you mean by "holy". I don't think that even begins to follow.

Of course I realise that you are really a fat, hairy spinster surrounded by cats and religious texts, your surname being Bishop with perhaps a forename of Emily, and that you are no more connected with the anglican church than Richard Dawkins.

you're right - I have no connection at all to the anglican church - and hence - no connection at all to "evensong".

Nah, not having that. I did not describe 'em as wankers, rather onanists. Meaning similar, words dissimilar.

Come on, put up a better fight damn you. 7th Day Adventists?, Holy Roman Catlic?, Little Baby Jesus' Drop-In Bar and Whorehouse?

[thebish]

Come on, put up a better fight damn you. 7th Day Adventists?, Holy Roman Catlic?, Little Baby Jesus' Drop-In Bar and Whorehouse?

Is this a challenge to some kind of "list a lot of words" competition? If so - I am unfamiliar with the rules...

[Bruce Rioja]

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

See, I took that to mean, two people that you didn't consider to be 'Labour-supporting onanists'

Nah, not having that. I did not describe 'em as wankers, rather onanists. Meaning similar, words dissimilar.

But no. I'm actually being called an onanist....... on the internet! Crikey.

Well that's my day ruined.

[Montreal Wanderer]

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

See, I took that to mean, two people that you didn't consider to be 'Labour-supporting onanists'

Nah, not having that. I did not describe 'em as wankers, rather onanists. Meaning similar, words dissimilar.

But no. I'm actually being called an onanist....... on the internet! Crikey.

Well that's my day ruined.

I'd be very surprised if there was any person on earth who had not been an onanist (in its current as opposed to interruptus sense) at one time or another. Further, in the 21st century, we tend to encourage birth control given the "population explosion" - you should be flattered, Bruce, though I'm not sure about the Labour support part - I shall have to consult pencilbiter.

[bedwetter2]

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

See, I took that to mean, two people that you didn't consider to be 'Labour-supporting onanists'

Nah, not having that. I did not describe 'em as wankers, rather onanists. Meaning similar, words dissimilar.

But no. I'm actually being called an onanist....... on the internet! Crikey.

Well that's my day ruined.

Hehe. Your original interpretation was correct. Isn't grammer a strange and demanding mistress.

[bedwetter2]

Come on, put up a better fight damn you. 7th Day Adventists?, Holy Roman Catlic?, Little Baby Jesus' Drop-In Bar and Whorehouse?

Is this a challenge to some kind of "list a lot of words" competition? If so - I am unfamiliar with the rules...

I'm not sure of the rules either, but I can make some up if you want.

[bedwetter2]

You mean that two non Labour-supporting onanists took part in a poll regarding the future leadership of that party of lost souls.......? Well fcuk me rigid!

See, I took that to mean, two people that you didn't consider to be 'Labour-supporting onanists'

Nah, not having that. I did not describe 'em as wankers, rather onanists. Meaning similar, words dissimilar.

But no. I'm actually being called an onanist....... on the internet! Crikey.

Well that's my day ruined.

Hehe. Your original interpretation was correct. Isn't grammer a strange and demanding mistress.

And spelling!

[Hoboh]

Nice to see planet hoboh scored more than all the other parties bar the big three put together!

Hang um high boyz we'll be back!

[Hoboh]

More housey housey