Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:14 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Bijou Bob wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It did occur to me while Amanda Thatcher was reading today that I would be happy to discuss her grandmother's legacy over a coffee with her.
Really? Does nowt for me. Looks like a less fit version of Billie Piper.

Each to their own I guess.
And you are over twice her age, no?!
Apparently, dating laws state that the youngest you can go is half your age plus 7. I can now hear lots of frantic mental maths going on.
Well that rules her out for me too. Hmmm.
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:53 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
Unless I'm missing something the main thing wrong here is your maths........ :wink:

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
Unless I'm missing something the main thing wrong here is your maths........ :wink:
Well, let's see Einstein. If you are 26 half your age plus 7 is 13+7 equals 20. Therefore you cannot date a 19 year old.
However, in two years time you will be 28 and she will be 21. 14 + 7 is 21, so you can date her. How hard is that?
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38813
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:06 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
Unless I'm missing something the main thing wrong here is your maths........ :wink:
Well, let's see Einstein. If you are 26 half your age plus 7 is 13+7 equals 20. Therefore you cannot date a 19 year old.
However, in two years time you will be 28 and she will be 21. 14 + 7 is 21, so you can date her. How hard is that?
Yes but what when you're 27?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by thebish » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:09 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
Unless I'm missing something the main thing wrong here is your maths........ :wink:
Well, let's see Einstein. If you are 26 half your age plus 7 is 13+7 equals 20. Therefore you cannot date a 19 year old.
However, in two years time you will be 28 and she will be 21. 14 + 7 is 21, so you can date her. How hard is that?
Yes but what when you're 27?
(the other "Einstein" can only divide even numbers by two :wink: )

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:15 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
Something is wrong if a 26 year old can't date a 19 year old, but if he waits two years he's fine.
Unless I'm missing something the main thing wrong here is your maths........ :wink:
Well, let's see Einstein. If you are 26 half your age plus 7 is 13+7 equals 20. Therefore you cannot date a 19 year old.
However, in two years time you will be 28 and she will be 21. 14 + 7 is 21, so you can date her. How hard is that?
Yes but what when you're 27?
13.5 + 7 = 20.5. She will be twenty and still too young. That is why I said two years (not because I cannot divide odd number your bishiness). God this is hard.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by William the White » Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:56 pm

I just worked out that I'm still on for Penelope Cruz... :D

I wonder if she knows?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by thebish » Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:57 pm

William the White wrote:I just worked out that I'm still on for Penelope Cruz... :D

I wonder if she knows?
it haunts her every waking moment! :wink:

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9714
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:03 pm

William the White wrote:I just worked out that I'm still on for Penelope Cruz... :D

I wonder if she knows?
The biggest question is does GtE know? :Jedi:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:14 pm

I'm claiming exclusive rights to Sophie Marceau and Audrey Tautou, and to hell with the age differences. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9714
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:42 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:I'm claiming exclusive rights to Sophie Marceau and Audrey Tautou, and to hell with the age differences. :wink:
I may have to use my superior youthfulness to challenge you on Audrey. She be mine :Jedi:

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Prufrock » Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:54 pm

Yeah, well fcuk you both. I definitely qualify.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Prufrock » Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:55 pm

It makes me happy a)that this thread has gone in this direction, and b)that it was Tory Boy who started it! :D
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by Gary the Enfield » Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:58 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
William the White wrote:I just worked out that I'm still on for Penelope Cruz... :D

I wonder if she knows?
The biggest question is does GtE know? :Jedi:

He does now. Back off wordwright! :whack:

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by seanworth » Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:32 pm

Image

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:55 pm

So the Cabinet Office has published the costs for Thatcher's funeral: £1.6m, over two thirds of which was on security and policing. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cost ... rs-funeral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by bobo the clown » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:45 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So the Cabinet Office has published the costs for Thatcher's funeral: £1.6m, over two thirds of which was on security and policing. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cost ... rs-funeral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
OK, so what's happened to the other £8.4m ?

Can I assume that those outraged by the £10m claimed to be being spent will now no longer be outraged .... or at least only 16% as outraged. Or will they admit that the cost, much as it was what was used to jusify their ire, was in fact not what they objected to at all ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by thebish » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:49 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So the Cabinet Office has published the costs for Thatcher's funeral: £1.6m, over two thirds of which was on security and policing. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cost ... rs-funeral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
OK, so what's happened to the other £8.4m ?

Can I assume that those outraged by the £10m claimed to be being spent will now no longer be outraged .... or at least only 16% as outraged. Or will they admit that the cost, much as it was what was used to jusify their ire, was in fact not what they objected to at all ?
I'm sure they will as long as mummy now gives his support for the same treatment for Tony Blair... :wink:

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by bobo the clown » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:52 pm

thebish wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So the Cabinet Office has published the costs for Thatcher's funeral: £1.6m, over two thirds of which was on security and policing. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cost ... rs-funeral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
OK, so what's happened to the other £8.4m ?

Can I assume that those outraged by the £10m claimed to be being spent will now no longer be outraged .... or at least only 16% as outraged. Or will they admit that the cost, much as it was what was used to jusify their ire, was in fact not what they objected to at all ?
I'm sure they will as long as mummy now gives his support for the same treatment for Tony Blair... :wink:
It will be replicated for Tony Blair ... unless he declines it, which I doubt.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Margaret Thatcher, R.I.P.?

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:32 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:I'm claiming exclusive rights to Sophie Marceau and Audrey Tautou, and to hell with the age differences. :wink:
I may have to use my superior youthfulness to challenge you on Audrey. She be mine :Jedi:
Yeah, well fcuk you both. I definitely qualify.
Oh, and don't even look in Jamie Lee's direction. She's long been exclusively mine. :twisted:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests