The end of 'Playing for a Point' ???
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
a golden shower if you like?CrazyHorse wrote:And the winner of the golden gamble gets to join them in the shower after the game.Soldier_Of_The_White_Army wrote:Mmmmmm 22 pxssed off lesbians not passing to each other. Could be interesting.communistworkethic wrote:or have naked women's football ?CrazyHorse wrote:If it's more excitement you're after, how about twice a game they sound a klaxon which gives the players 30 seconds to run to and hide in a special bunker next to the dugout before they unleash a couple of hungry leopards onto the pitch.communistworkethic wrote:make the goal twice as big, then there'll be more goals. More goals= more excitement, everyone knows that!!!!
I say shower, but what I actually mean is the pitch side mud wrestling arena.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Wet Sham & Citeh are pushing to get this implemented pronto !hisroyalgingerness wrote:Angry Premiership clubs have threatened to ban promotion to the Premiership if penalty shoot-outs are brought in to decide Football League games. (The Sun)
anyway wind your necks in, appears just to be the football league, not the prem
let them eat cake
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
My previous post was, obviously (I hope), in jest.
The idea of one point for a win and nothing for either a draw or a loss does have appeal. Goal difference, as is the case at this point in time, to be used to sort those teams on equal points. It surely could be argued that not winning a contest, no matter how well fought the battle, hardly entitles either side to claim some sort of reward.
I am afraid that the use of penalties to to tip the points one way or the other has never appealed to me; nor the use of corner statistics for that matter (it was tried here some years ago, if I recall correctly, and then abandoned).
There is nothing wrong with extra time - apart from spectators missing transport connections - but artificial results, and I include the 'golden goal' , to me make a mockery of the game.
I don't have the time at the moment, but it'd be interesting to see how the current table(s) might look if they were converted to such a system. It (they) wouldn't be correct as it would not be possible to include the variation in tactics that would undoubtedly be introduced by managers if such a system was in place.
The idea of one point for a win and nothing for either a draw or a loss does have appeal. Goal difference, as is the case at this point in time, to be used to sort those teams on equal points. It surely could be argued that not winning a contest, no matter how well fought the battle, hardly entitles either side to claim some sort of reward.
I am afraid that the use of penalties to to tip the points one way or the other has never appealed to me; nor the use of corner statistics for that matter (it was tried here some years ago, if I recall correctly, and then abandoned).
There is nothing wrong with extra time - apart from spectators missing transport connections - but artificial results, and I include the 'golden goal' , to me make a mockery of the game.
I don't have the time at the moment, but it'd be interesting to see how the current table(s) might look if they were converted to such a system. It (they) wouldn't be correct as it would not be possible to include the variation in tactics that would undoubtedly be introduced by managers if such a system was in place.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests