Batman has been to court -now with legal bollocks on p3-
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Yes Monty, of course - I didn't word that very well - what I mean is that it is a criminal offence to refuse a police officer's request (which is usually in English!) to breath into a breathalsyer without a reasonable excuse.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Surely, PB, it would be a criminal offence for anyone to refuse to take the test in England regardless of language spoken. You cannot have laws that specifically target English speakers but let foreigners off - that would be discrimination. Obviously now, foreigners are safer to take take the test and then claim not to understand - which is dumb. The whole thing makes no sense to me.
As far as I'm aware, there are two excuses that might be considered reasonable:
1. The suspect has a medical condition that means he/she can't safely provide enough breath for the device to sample.
2. The suspect speaks so little English that the request was not understood.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9130
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Well he was from Estonia.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: The language thing is a joke... anyone in the civilised world knows what it means when a police officer asks you to breath into a little black device at the roadside.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Yet re 2, he did in fact provide the sample whether or not he understood the purpose. Why would that invalidate the test? Also, if he was so drunk he couldn't get out of the car (Batty's testimony) why wouldn't such other eyewitness evidence from Batty and police also be valid? Still, as Gertie would say, confuserated.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yes Monty, of course - I didn't word that very well - what I mean is that it is a criminal offence to refuse a police officer's request (which is usually in English!) to breath into a breathalsyer without a reasonable excuse.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Surely, PB, it would be a criminal offence for anyone to refuse to take the test in England regardless of language spoken. You cannot have laws that specifically target English speakers but let foreigners off - that would be discrimination. Obviously now, foreigners are safer to take take the test and then claim not to understand - which is dumb. The whole thing makes no sense to me.
As far as I'm aware, there are two excuses that might be considered reasonable:
1. The suspect has a medical condition that means he/she can't safely provide enough breath for the device to sample.
2. The suspect speaks so little English that the request was not understood.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:01 pm
- Location: Sheffield
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43335
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
For a conviction to be obtained here, it would need:
Video evidence showing at least a dozen witnesses at the scene, one holding up a watch and another a copy of the daily newspaper with the date underlined.
A police car driving past at that moment with four occupants all with 20/20 vision.
A Polish/Estonion impartial witness who lived at least two villages away from the defendant and was no relation back home.
A Polish/Estonion translator who also had to take a breathalyser test to be sure he understood what was said and wasn't drunk.
A Catholic Priest, A Rabbi, A Buddhist and an elder of the Muslim Faith.
A phsyciatrist.
A sound recording technician.
A reporter from The Sun newspaper
The Mayor of Preston.
Robin.
Case may well still have been dismissed if the defendant claimed he was an athiest and he had got drunk with the Polish/Estonion Ambassador and was claiming diplomatic immunity.
.
Video evidence showing at least a dozen witnesses at the scene, one holding up a watch and another a copy of the daily newspaper with the date underlined.
A police car driving past at that moment with four occupants all with 20/20 vision.
A Polish/Estonion impartial witness who lived at least two villages away from the defendant and was no relation back home.
A Polish/Estonion translator who also had to take a breathalyser test to be sure he understood what was said and wasn't drunk.
A Catholic Priest, A Rabbi, A Buddhist and an elder of the Muslim Faith.
A phsyciatrist.
A sound recording technician.
A reporter from The Sun newspaper
The Mayor of Preston.
Robin.
Case may well still have been dismissed if the defendant claimed he was an athiest and he had got drunk with the Polish/Estonion Ambassador and was claiming diplomatic immunity.
.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32714
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
That would ensure everything was bang to rights and reported clearly and in an unbiased mannerTANGODANCER wrote:For a conviction to be obtained here, it would need:
Video evidence showing at least a dozen witnesses at the scene, one holding up a watch and another a copy of the daily newspaper with the date underlined.
A police car driving past at that moment with four occupants all with 20/20 vision.
A Polish/Estonion impartial witness who lived at least two villages away from the defendant and was no relation back home.
A Polish/Estonion translator who also had to take a breathalyser test to be sure he understood what was said and wasn't drunk.
A Catholic Priest, A Rabbi, A Buddhist and an elder of the Muslim Faith.
A phsyciatrist.
A sound recording technician.
A reporter from The Sun newspaper
The Mayor of Preston.
Robin.
Case may well still have been dismissed if the defendant claimed he was an athiest and he had got drunk with the Polish/Estonion Ambassador and was claiming diplomatic immunity.
.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43335
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Since when has truth been the main priority in newspaper reporting?Worthy4England wrote:That would ensure everything was bang to rights and reported clearly and in an unbiased mannerTANGODANCER wrote:For a conviction to be obtained here, it would need:
Video evidence showing at least a dozen witnesses at the scene, one holding up a watch and another a copy of the daily newspaper with the date underlined.
A police car driving past at that moment with four occupants all with 20/20 vision.
A Polish/Estonion impartial witness who lived at least two villages away from the defendant and was no relation back home.
A Polish/Estonion translator who also had to take a breathalyser test to be sure he understood what was said and wasn't drunk.
A Catholic Priest, A Rabbi, A Buddhist and an elder of the Muslim Faith.
A phsyciatrist.
A sound recording technician.
A reporter from The Sun newspaper
The Mayor of Preston.
Robin.
Case may well still have been dismissed if the defendant claimed he was an athiest and he had got drunk with the Polish/Estonion Ambassador and was claiming diplomatic immunity.
.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32714
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Or in a court room?TANGODANCER wrote:Since when has truth been the main priority in newspaper reporting?Worthy4England wrote:That would ensure everything was bang to rights and reported clearly and in an unbiased mannerTANGODANCER wrote:For a conviction to be obtained here, it would need:
Video evidence showing at least a dozen witnesses at the scene, one holding up a watch and another a copy of the daily newspaper with the date underlined.
A police car driving past at that moment with four occupants all with 20/20 vision.
A Polish/Estonion impartial witness who lived at least two villages away from the defendant and was no relation back home.
A Polish/Estonion translator who also had to take a breathalyser test to be sure he understood what was said and wasn't drunk.
A Catholic Priest, A Rabbi, A Buddhist and an elder of the Muslim Faith.
A phsyciatrist.
A sound recording technician.
A reporter from The Sun newspaper
The Mayor of Preston.
Robin.
Case may well still have been dismissed if the defendant claimed he was an athiest and he had got drunk with the Polish/Estonion Ambassador and was claiming diplomatic immunity.
.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43335
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Hah, I've never been there (perhaps Bruce can inform us), but I believe that Estonia is an upwardly mobile place these days... I know Gordon Brown would love to have something like their growth rate.Harry Genshaw wrote:Well he was from Estonia.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: The language thing is a joke... anyone in the civilised world knows what it means when a police officer asks you to breath into a little black device at the roadside.
A taxi driver I know picked up three Estonians fellas from Liverpool airport the other week, and they were most surprised when they couldn't pay the fare by credit card... a common facility in their homeland.
Put it this way, they'll all know what a fecking breathalyser is!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Yep, I'm confused as well.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Yet re 2, he did in fact provide the sample whether or not he understood the purpose. Why would that invalidate the test? Also, if he was so drunk he couldn't get out of the car (Batty's testimony) why wouldn't such other eyewitness evidence from Batty and police also be valid? Still, as Gertie would say, confuserated.
Sometimes we're so keen to play by the Queensbury Rules when it comes to foreigners, that we come off looking a bit of a joke.
It is quite proper that non-English speakers should be protected from being unfairly disadvantaged by a language barrier, but a breathalyser test is a very factual thing that nobody is allowed to turn down with impunity anyway... bizarre.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
The prosecution called me in for the Grand Jury. I am sure that I will be on both lists for the trial. Aside from knowing the accused at work I have little to do with it, but it's something I would rather not re-visit in a court room.Montreal Wanderer wrote:As a defence or prosecution witness?americantrotter wrote:As shitty as it is, count yourself lucky you don't have to go to court about a co-worker who murdered her kids. (Allegedly) That was a part of my 07 that will I'm sure come up again in 08.
Hopefully he paid for your car, as that sentence sucks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests