Bands you don't "get".

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Little Green Man
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4471
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Justin Edinburgh

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Little Green Man » Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:26 pm

thebish wrote: there's a rat in mi kitchen, what am I gonna do, I'm gonna fix that rat that's what I'm gonna do,
Brandish a comb at it, then the fecker will rue the day!

mcflykyle182
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:35 am

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by mcflykyle182 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:43 pm

Any of this dull Indie shite like The Courteeners and Mumford and Sons.

Also Oasis. Its not that I don'e get them, I just think they're wank.
''Amazing! Out of nothing Bolton are level. A quick throw, Kevin Nolan keeps play alive in the box and finds Kevin Davies on the left who lashes a shot under Oliver Kahn.''

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by bwfcdan94 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:56 pm

Beefheart wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:TBH though their hasn't been a great band since Oasis, Kasabian are good but by no stretch of the imagination great. Music is rubbish now deal with it.
So, you don't get the Beatles, however, Beatles tribute act Oasis are a great band?

Righty oh.
Mmm, I can understand not liking The Beatles, but when you think Oasis are the only 'great' band of the the last 20 years it sounds a bit odd, Dan.

Not all music now is rubbish either, if you can't find anything good you aren't looking hard enough!
There are some good small bands but there is not many bands that I could name and many of you would go oh yeah there quite good and be able to name me even 1 of their songs. Maximo park are good but not exactly famous are they now.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by bwfcdan94 » Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:58 pm

Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.

But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?
Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:00 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote: There are some good small bands but there is not many bands that I could name and many of you would go oh yeah there quite good and be able to name me even 1 of their songs.
Seriously, Dan, I haven't even the faintest idea as to what it is that you're attempting to say there.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:02 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:
Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.

But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?
Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.
Yep, the comparison's are drawn by what they say in interviews. 4ucking genius. :roll:
May the bridges I burn light your way

Beefheart
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:36 pm

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Beefheart » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:04 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:
Jakerbeef wrote:I've never gotten the Beatles and Oasis comparisons. I'm willing to cut Dan some slack on this one.

But people having a pop at Springsteen, Queen, Rush, Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden...are you allergic to stupendous Rock or summat?
Exactly find me an interview where either Liam or Noel goes oh year we based our music on the Beatles I could certainly find you some where Liam says he has no interest ion the Beatles.
Are you joking?

'Noel Gallagher has said that Liam showed little interest in music until his late teens.[5] Liam became confident in his abilities to sing and began listening to bands like The Stone Roses, The Who, The Kinks, The Jam, T.Rex and The Beatles. In the process he forged a lifelong obsession with John Lennon; Liam would later claim to be Lennon re-incarnated, despite being born eight years prior to Lennon's death'

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by General Mannerheim » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:17 pm

youre a pervert if you dont like reggae, im mean proper reggae, not ub40 or Bob Marleys greatest hits.

play Babylon, 'Thank you for the many things youve done' if that doesnt change your mind, youre a pervert.

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Wandering Willy » Thu Aug 22, 2013 7:57 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Wandering Willy wrote:Tiny feck Templar
I think I'd probably be in agreement for that one - just a hunch.

Is he related to Tynchy Stryder or Tinie Tempah or Tempah T?
Yes
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:26 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Ocean Colour Scene.

The Specials (In fact, any of that Ska / Rude Boy / Two-tone stuff).
now you've gone too far!!
Seriously. A feeling that's lasted since around the 2nd year at school. Read also - Reggae.
Good call.

Sorry but UB40 are in the list for me as well.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by bwfcdan94 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:10 pm

I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

Annoyed Grunt
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8046
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Annoyed Grunt » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:23 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Oasis are/were better......

mcflykyle182
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:35 am

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by mcflykyle182 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:34 pm

Annoyed Grunt wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Oasis are/were better......

''Amazing! Out of nothing Bolton are level. A quick throw, Kevin Nolan keeps play alive in the box and finds Kevin Davies on the left who lashes a shot under Oliver Kahn.''

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:35 pm

Gilbert and Sullivan

and - for that matter - Gilbert O'Sullivan...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:41 pm

Annoyed Grunt wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Oasis are/were better......
If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:42 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Annoyed Grunt wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Oasis are/were better......
If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.
I never got the whole blur vs oasis thing... I mean - did anyone really give a toss??

Annoyed Grunt
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8046
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Annoyed Grunt » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:43 pm

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
Annoyed Grunt wrote:
bwfcdan94 wrote:I take it back Blur are not halve bad but again they are not a "great" band.
Oasis are/were better......
If we can go back to the OP and the point of not 'getting' rather than simply not 'liking', and on the subject of Blur, although I've never liked it either, I sure as shit never 'got' Song Two. I've never understood its utter admiration by some. There used to be an absolute clamour towards the dancefloor whenever it came on down the old indie disco's, and I'd be stood there shrugging my shoulders before utilising the opportunity to go to the bar.
I never got the whole blur vs oasis thing... I mean - did anyone really give a toss??
Yep, people did.......

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by thebish » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:45 pm

did they?? blimey! I thought it was just a big bag of publicity wank put about by the media!

Annoyed Grunt
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8046
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
Location: Bolton

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Annoyed Grunt » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:52 pm

I worked in Woolworths at the time it was going on, people got really into the battle.

Blur (Country House) beat Oasis (Roll With It) as the barcode on Roll With It didn't scan, so a lot of stores just put it through as a £1.99 single.....which didn't count towards the chart positions..

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Bands you don't "get".

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:52 pm

thebish wrote:did they?? blimey! I thought it was just a big bag of publicity wank put about by the media!
It was exactly that. Some punters actually took it seriously though, which was quite incredible.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests