What are you watching tonight?

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
DJBlu
Site Admin
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:38 pm

Post by DJBlu » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:25 am

Just watched Blue Streak in full for the first time.

Everytime before the TV/DVD player broke. 3rd time lucky I suppose.

hisroyalgingerness
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by hisroyalgingerness » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:24 am

Rome series 2. Kevin Nolan and David Moyes kicking ten tons of shit out of their enemy. Good watch. Plentiful nudity and violence

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:43 am

TANGODANCER wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Wasn't it a different Unforgiven on tonight?
Well, there was something on called "Unbreakable", but I thought Bruce meant the western "The Unforgiven". Apologies if I got it wrong.
No need to apologise, Tango. It's a mini-drama with Suranne Jones and Peter Davison in.
May the bridges I burn light your way

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:20 pm

Saw Slumdog Millionaire last night... I thought it deserving of much of the praise it is receiving, even if the underlying love story is pretty contrived and clichéd.

I was amazed to read this nonsense in the Telegraph though...
But the influence of Slumdog Millionaire could be felt well beyond this year's Oscar ceremony. Indeed, I wonder whether, in coming years, we shall not regard it as the first emblematic film of the Barack Obama era.

This is not merely because I think the US President-elect would like Slumdog Millionaire – though I am confident that he would. It is more that the film is such a radical contender for Oscars, and in ways that correspond to what appears to be Obama's world view.

[...]

If that hints at a new way forward for the film industry in this credit-crunch era, so does the theme of Slumdog Millionaire. One of the delights of Beaufoy's script is a contradiction: the portrayal of a city obsessed with amassing wealth – the hustle, the deal, the next get-rich-quick scheme – with a romantic young man at its centre who cares nothing for money. Instead, the overwhelmingly important thing in his life is his love for Latika, a slum girl he has known since childhood. He loses her for years at a time, and finally finds her living as a wealthy gangster's girlfriend and pleads with her to run away with him. "What will we live on?" she asks anxiously, in the story's key exchange. "Love," he says, simply.

And in that single word lie the key qualities of Slumdog Millionaire. It does not have an ironic moment. It is utterly devoid of cynicism. Instead, it is bright-eyed, optimistic – idealistic, even. To generations reared on a drip-feed of corrosive cynicism, the elevation of greed for greed's sake and weary disillusion with our leaders and our institutions it feels almost shocking.

Yet maybe we're ready for it. We saw these laudable qualities in the hundreds of thousands of people (most of them young) who toiled to elect Obama. Those whose work limits them to poring over the minutiae of life in Washington's Beltway and the Westminster village have already been murmuring that this idealism looks like naïveté. Yet look where our defensive cynicism has landed us: maybe we do need to look at the world anew.
:vomit:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film ... a-era.html
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Post by General Mannerheim » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:49 pm

going to see it tomorrow, looking forward to it so will wait and read that article afterwards.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:31 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Saw Slumdog Millionaire last night... I thought it deserving of much of the praise it is receiving, even if the underlying love story is pretty contrived and clichéd.

I was amazed to read this nonsense in the Telegraph though...
But the influence of Slumdog Millionaire could be felt well beyond this year's Oscar ceremony. Indeed, I wonder whether, in coming years, we shall not regard it as the first emblematic film of the Barack Obama era.

This is not merely because I think the US President-elect would like Slumdog Millionaire – though I am confident that he would. It is more that the film is such a radical contender for Oscars, and in ways that correspond to what appears to be Obama's world view.

[...]

If that hints at a new way forward for the film industry in this credit-crunch era, so does the theme of Slumdog Millionaire. One of the delights of Beaufoy's script is a contradiction: the portrayal of a city obsessed with amassing wealth – the hustle, the deal, the next get-rich-quick scheme – with a romantic young man at its centre who cares nothing for money. Instead, the overwhelmingly important thing in his life is his love for Latika, a slum girl he has known since childhood. He loses her for years at a time, and finally finds her living as a wealthy gangster's girlfriend and pleads with her to run away with him. "What will we live on?" she asks anxiously, in the story's key exchange. "Love," he says, simply.

And in that single word lie the key qualities of Slumdog Millionaire. It does not have an ironic moment. It is utterly devoid of cynicism. Instead, it is bright-eyed, optimistic – idealistic, even. To generations reared on a drip-feed of corrosive cynicism, the elevation of greed for greed's sake and weary disillusion with our leaders and our institutions it feels almost shocking.

Yet maybe we're ready for it. We saw these laudable qualities in the hundreds of thousands of people (most of them young) who toiled to elect Obama. Those whose work limits them to poring over the minutiae of life in Washington's Beltway and the Westminster village have already been murmuring that this idealism looks like naïveté. Yet look where our defensive cynicism has landed us: maybe we do need to look at the world anew.
:vomit:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film ... a-era.html
Rolling on the floor laughing. Betrayed by the Telegraph... hard to bear... But, I'm confident the pencil will fall before you are taken in by such human naivete... :lol:

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:35 pm

Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:41 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
The Times your 'paper of record'? :lol: ...

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:42 pm

William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
The Times your 'paper of record'? :lol: ...
And the superior alternative you would offer is....?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:45 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
The Times your 'paper of record'? :lol: ...
And the superior alternative you would offer is....?
i think you know the answer to that... One that has a consistent record in its viewpoint, rather than sidling from 'thunderer' to 'whisperer'... :wink:

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:47 pm

William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
The Times your 'paper of record'? :lol: ...
And the superior alternative you would offer is....?
i think you know the answer to that... One that has a consistent record in its viewpoint, rather than sidling from 'thunderer' to 'whisperer'... :wink:
Whenever I play golf with Bruce Rioja, he always shoots something round about the 100 mark.

Interesting virtue, consistency. :wink:
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:52 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, not really a fan of the Telegraph anyway, believe it or not... still prefer the upper end of Murdoch's products to any of its rivals. No, someone sent that link to me knowing it would activate my gag reflex. :mrgreen:
The Times your 'paper of record'? :lol: ...
And the superior alternative you would offer is....?
i think you know the answer to that... One that has a consistent record in its viewpoint, rather than sidling from 'thunderer' to 'whisperer'... :wink:
Whenever I play golf with Bruce Rioja, he always shoots something round about the 100 mark.

Interesting virtue, consistency. :wink:
You shoot 98 one game, 102 the next? Not wanting to be consistent. :wink:

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:12 am

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Whenever I play golf with Bruce Rioja, he always shoots something round about the 100 mark.

Interesting virtue, consistency. :wink:
Well, I also prefer The Times. It's a bit like going round in 100 really - get your money's worth. :wink:
May the bridges I burn light your way

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:03 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Whenever I play golf with Bruce Rioja, he always shoots something round about the 100 mark.

Interesting virtue, consistency. :wink:
Well, I also prefer The Times. It's a bit like going round in 100 really - get your money's worth. :wink:
to be honest The Times may be a great paper for all, i know. I loathe murdoch so much that I don't buy his papers, nor his tv. When the wanderers win I read the Times report in the library at work, but that's about it. But the pre-Murdoch Times was as dreary as whites v wigan... :wink:

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Post by General Mannerheim » Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:44 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:going to see it tomorrow, looking forward to it so will wait and read that article afterwards.
Why is it when your really looking forward to a film you generally walk out dissapointed? Largely overhyped I reckon, I remebber feeling the same after watching the Dark Knight.

The film is good don’t get me wrong, especially the first half, and it looks stunning. But like mummy said, too predictable and clichéd – and a real poor ending I thought, the phone a friend business, then he’s sat on the floor in the train station… bollocks.

Dev Patel nominated best actor at the bafta’s!? he is only has to act in the final 20 mins, he just sits in chair for the rest of it. The best actor accolade should go to one of the kids who played him and his brother when they were little.

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Post by General Mannerheim » Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:49 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:going to see it tomorrow, looking forward to it so will wait and read that article afterwards.
Why is it when your really looking forward to a film you generally walk out dissapointed? Largely overhyped I reckon, I remebber feeling the same after watching the Dark Knight.

The film is good don’t get me wrong, especially the first half, and it looks stunning. But like mummy said, too predictable and clichéd – and a real poor ending I thought, the phone a friend business, then he’s sat on the floor in the train station… bollocks.

Dev Patel nominated best actor at the bafta’s!? he is only has to act in the final 20 mins, he just sits in chair for the rest of it. The best actor accolade should go to one of the kids who played him and his brother when they were little.
I should mention my enjoyment of the film was hampered by my mood - the cinema was packed out, i mean no spare seats, people were sat in the isles - people talking, constant rustling of crisp packets, cans opening - and the bloke next to me stunk like he was a friggin slumdog! i couldn't wait for it to end

Daxter
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1524
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:51 pm
Location: Brighton

Post by Daxter » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:41 pm

Saw 'The Wrestler' last week. Absolutely brilliant film, that deserves the hype and praise it's recieving.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:51 pm

Going to give "Black Rain" a rewatch on one of the Freeview channels (32) tonight. Seen it a couple of times but it's one of Michael Douglas's decent films.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:24 pm

Daxter wrote:Saw 'The Wrestler' last week. Absolutely brilliant film, that deserves the hype and praise it's recieving.
Oh, nice one. That's on my list to see. Good shout.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:34 pm

Watched Simon Schama's History of America on't i-player (whilst trying to do some homework). I'm a big fan of his work, its worth a watch, if thats your bag.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests