Lehman Bros
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Thanks Worthy.Worthy4England wrote:I think you've not quite yet got to the bit where the Banks "insured" their debts using derivatives through AIG to the tune of around $450 Bn. Global GDP is sat at about $54 Trillion, AIG's balance sheet made up about 2% of that...sluffy wrote:communistworkethic wrote:If anyone has any questions about HBOS/Lloyds TSB and/or the current market and their savings etc. please PM me and I will with the help of the mods set up a sticky thread with answers to them all, including why WFE is still wrongAnd DLH has interpreted what's in the press correctly but it's not the real story
........
As I understand it the greatest 'free' economy in the world - the USA started the whole financial problem that we are currently in due to lending money somewhat indiscriminately to people with poor credit ratings so that they could purchase their own homes. After lending this capital for these people to buy their own piece of America the banks sold on these 'debts' to other bigger banks who in return provided more funds for the original banks to fund further people with even worse credit records to buy their own houses. These 'debts' were again 'packaged' up and sold on for even more money to the other banks who again provided more capital for the banks to lend money to people with yet even worse credit ratings to buy their own house, etc, etc.
Now as I understand it the head of the Banking system in America is in affect attempting to 'nationalise' this bad debt to free up the banking system.
We also need to throw Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into the general discussion, as these two organisations guarantee approx $6 Trillion dollars worth of the US Mortgage market.
All three are "effectively" now owned by the US tax payer....
The issue around Lehmans was small beer compared to these guys which is why there was an apparent shrug from the Fed that it went tits up. As was the issue around HBOS/Lloyds TSB
I did know that (not the exact figures though) but I'd thought I'd already got enough in my original post to 'unmask' the reason behind Commies user name!
Clearly now he and his colleagues (or should that be comrades!) have been working hard to use the capitalists free worlds economic banking system to ultimately force the US government to nationalise its bad debts (and thus a goodly portion of its country’s land) which in turn means that the state now owns the land which is one of the main pillars of communism!
Commie's user name as been there for some time for us all to see – but the explanation for it as only just become apparent to me!

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
We might struggle in the UK with that one. Think the Crown still legally own it all....sluffy wrote:Thanks Worthy.Worthy4England wrote:I think you've not quite yet got to the bit where the Banks "insured" their debts using derivatives through AIG to the tune of around $450 Bn. Global GDP is sat at about $54 Trillion, AIG's balance sheet made up about 2% of that...sluffy wrote:communistworkethic wrote:If anyone has any questions about HBOS/Lloyds TSB and/or the current market and their savings etc. please PM me and I will with the help of the mods set up a sticky thread with answers to them all, including why WFE is still wrongAnd DLH has interpreted what's in the press correctly but it's not the real story
........
As I understand it the greatest 'free' economy in the world - the USA started the whole financial problem that we are currently in due to lending money somewhat indiscriminately to people with poor credit ratings so that they could purchase their own homes. After lending this capital for these people to buy their own piece of America the banks sold on these 'debts' to other bigger banks who in return provided more funds for the original banks to fund further people with even worse credit records to buy their own houses. These 'debts' were again 'packaged' up and sold on for even more money to the other banks who again provided more capital for the banks to lend money to people with yet even worse credit ratings to buy their own house, etc, etc.
Now as I understand it the head of the Banking system in America is in affect attempting to 'nationalise' this bad debt to free up the banking system.
We also need to throw Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into the general discussion, as these two organisations guarantee approx $6 Trillion dollars worth of the US Mortgage market.
All three are "effectively" now owned by the US tax payer....
The issue around Lehmans was small beer compared to these guys which is why there was an apparent shrug from the Fed that it went tits up. As was the issue around HBOS/Lloyds TSB
I did know that (not the exact figures though) but I'd thought I'd already got enough in my original post to 'unmask' the reason behind Commies user name!
Clearly now he and his colleagues (or should that be comrades!) have been working hard to use the capitalists free worlds economic banking system to ultimately force the US government to nationalise its bad debts (and thus a goodly portion of its country’s land) which in turn means that the state now owns the land which is one of the main pillars of communism!
Commie's user name as been there for some time for us all to see – but the explanation for it as only just become apparent to me!

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
well, Karl Marx will be pissing his shroud laughing at the state of affairs we're in!Worthy4England wrote:"Off the record" that's hardly an unequivocal "no" to some of the questions he posed around communism taking over capitalism from the insidecommunistworkethic wrote:christ on a bike!! if I didn't have a headache from "off the record" briefings all week Sluffy's "question" certainly gave me one!
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31631
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Lehman Bros
Happened across this thread while searching for something else, and just thought I'd highlight this. It seems ever more apt.
Lord Kangana wrote:As long as they all got their bonuses before the sh*t hits the fan I'll be able to sleep soundly at night.
I'm sure theres some phrase to do with reaping what you sow, but no doubt that was considered surplus to requirement, along with the red-tape that some people call (rather fancifully) "financial regulations". Still, at least when the world slips into recession we can be comforted by the thought they've had some fun along the way.
Re: Lehman Bros
If anyone is interested, there's a quality documentary about this subject called The Inside Job
Troll and proud of it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests