John Motson
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: On the Premier League Express!
John Motson
"If Liverpool move to a new ground, do you think they would lose some of the atmosphere like Arsenal did when moving to the Emirates?"
Question - When did Highbury have ANY atmosphere. Highbury was more devoid of atmosphere than the SoL.
Question - When did Highbury have ANY atmosphere. Highbury was more devoid of atmosphere than the SoL.
Niall Quinn wrote:"Fans epitmoise a clubs spirit. We're nothing without the fans.
Anfield has no atmosphere either to be fair.
In fact nearly all home grounds are crap 80% of the time.
In fact nearly all home grounds are crap 80% of the time.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: John Motson
be awful to lose the chance of another 6 minutes of "justice for the 96"Hoolio wrote:"If Liverpool move to a new ground, do you think they would lose some of the atmosphere like Arsenal did when moving to the Emirates?"
.
Re: John Motson
s'far as I'm concerned - the liverpool fans can sing what they like - none of my business...fatshaft wrote:be awful to lose the chance of another 6 minutes of "justice for the 96"Hoolio wrote:"If Liverpool move to a new ground, do you think they would lose some of the atmosphere like Arsenal did when moving to the Emirates?"
but it does offend my musical ear that they chose that particular tune for the "Justice for the 96" chant..
it puts the stress in exactly the wrong place - musically it is plain wrong (and hence, grating...)
Just-ice to the 96 is the outcome of using that tune when the stress should be:
Just-ice to the 96 (I don't know what the Beatles would have made of it - Liverpool's musical maestros from the past must be turning in their graves...)
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
-
- Promising
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: in a queue
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43324
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: John Motson
Never been quite sure just what form this "justice" is expected to take. Is this another form of the Irish "Bloody Sunday" that will be ingrained into kids almost from birth when most of them don't even know what it's all about, then carry on into another generation who understand it even less? I can well understand the feelings of loss to the families involved, but the Kop singing about it at a football match just seems to cheapen it all. Just IMO. This is in no way meant to be demeaning or heartless, I just don't understand the persistence after all this time. What will end it?thebish wrote:s'far as I'm concerned - the liverpool fans can sing what they like - none of my business...fatshaft wrote:be awful to lose the chance of another 6 minutes of "justice for the 96"Hoolio wrote:"If Liverpool move to a new ground, do you think they would lose some of the atmosphere like Arsenal did when moving to the Emirates?"
but it does offend my musical ear that they chose that particular tune for the "Justice for the 96" chant..
it puts the stress in exactly the wrong place - musically it is plain wrong (and hence, grating...)
Just-ice to the 96 is the outcome of using that tune when the stress should be:
Just-ice to the 96 (I don't know what the Beatles would have made of it - Liverpool's musical maestros from the past must be turning in their graves...)
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: John Motson
I think they want Kelvin Mackenzie's head on some kind of metaphorical (possibly literal?) plate... How that would represent "justice" I don't know... but I guess that's what they want..TANGODANCER wrote:
Never been quite sure just what form this "justice" is expected to take. Is this another form of the Irish "Bloody Sunday" that will be ingrained into kids almost from birth when most of them don't even know what it's all about, then carry on into another generation who understand it even less? I can well understand the feelings of loss to the families involved, but the Kop singing about it at a football match just seems to cheapen it all. Just IMO. This is in no way meant to be demeaning or heartless, I just don't understand the persistence after all this time. What will end it?
I'm only guessing here - but I'd be surprised if many of the families really want it all dragged out again...
I believe a big part of their quest for 'Justice' comes from the fact that the members of the (at fault) Yorkshire Police force got more compensation for post-traumatic stress than the families of the deceased.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: On the Premier League Express!
Aye, cos they made thousands of ticket-less, drunk supporters of Liverpool stampede the ground, didn't they?Athers wrote:I believe a big part of their quest for 'Justice' comes from the fact that the members of the (at fault) Yorkshire Police force got more compensation for post-traumatic stress than the families of the deceased.
Niall Quinn wrote:"Fans epitmoise a clubs spirit. We're nothing without the fans.
I despair, I really do. How people continue to peddle this shite (and believe it) beggars belief. Would facts get in the way of your nice, little argument here, Hoolio?Hoolio wrote:Aye, cos they made thousands of ticket-less, drunk supporters of Liverpool stampede the ground, didn't they?
Oh, and just because I'm nice, I've dug up one of my old posts on the subject:
blurred wrote: Just a brief quote from Parklife by Nick Varley (an excellent footie book if you can lay your hands on it):
And a couple more from Liverpool University study into it, to be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/footballindustry/hborough.htmlSouth Yorkshire Police later pursued the theory - if not the Sun's specifics - of drunk and ticketless Liverpool fans being responsible in both evidence to Taylor, who summarily dismissed it, and then again anyway at the inquests into the deaths too.
Acting on information from unnamed police officers, and entitled
"The Truth", the 'Sun' claimed that drunken fans had forced the gates open because they did not have
match-tickets, that they stolen from the corpses lying on the pitch, assaulted police officers and the
emergency services, stolen cameras and other equipment from press photographers, and urinated on
police officers helping the victims. Months later, the "Sun" admitted that the allegations were totally false,
but it had already generated headlines all over the world, and the damage had been done.The failure to close or block the tunnel leading into the already full pens three and four once the police
had ordered Gate C to be opened was the immediate cause of the disaster, but the public inquiries set
up by the Thatcher Government under Lord Justice Peter Taylor found, more generally, that football had
simply not learned anything from the numerous disasters in its past, that it and the police were so
obsessed with the threat of violence that they were unable to spot people in genuine danger of their lives,
that police fundamentally lost control of the situation, and did not demonstrate the leadership expected
of senior officers, that safety procedures were inadequate, that the ground was badly maintained and
dangerous, that fans were routinely treated with contempt by football, and that fans had been the victims
rather the guilty party. His reports, published in August 1989 and January 1990, dismissed the allegations
against Liverpool supporters for the disaster, and called instead for a total rethink in the industry's attitudes
towards fans, and on the issue of safety.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12942
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
I'm not blaming you, I'm just pointing out (as I feel I should) that when people still believe that it was because of drunk, ticketless hooligans that that was not the case. It was a disaster waiting to happen in the late 80s, and football fans should be aware of and understand what was one of the turning points in the history of modern football. The tributes paid at the time, by fans of clubs up and down the country, reflected very much the 'there but for the sake of God go I' nature of it all.Hoolio wrote:To be fair, though, blurred...this thread wasn't meant to start a debate about Hillsbrough (FWIW, I'm 20,before my time...no interest)...so divvint blame me guv.
Anyway, Motson's shite and well past his best (and irritates the f*ck out of me on occasion), but I have to say well done to him yesterday for informing all and sundry watching what the 6 minutes was all about, whereas ex-Liverpool stalwart Lawrenson muttered absolutely f*ck all.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 14091
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 60 guests