The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Lol - delighted Boris attack dog has admitted that government pandemic preparations were found wanting and wholly inadequate for 6 years....Fairly sure that'll come back to bite....
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
She’s probably too stupid to know that her own government ripped up the pandemic planning that Blair and Cameron’s regimes had in place…you know stuff that was based on what happens in SE Asia….Worthy4England wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:56 pmLol - delighted Boris attack dog has admitted that government pandemic preparations were found wanting and wholly inadequate for 6 years....Fairly sure that'll come back to bite....
Actually take the probably out. She is too stupid. Or blind. Or both.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
My S-i-L, who holds a fairly senior NHS position, had been saying for the two or three years before Covid arrived that we were due a pandemic for which we were woefully underprepared.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:08 pmShe’s probably too stupid to know that her own government ripped up the pandemic planning that Blair and Cameron’s regimes had in place…you know stuff that was based on what happens in SE Asia….Worthy4England wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:56 pmLol - delighted Boris attack dog has admitted that government pandemic preparations were found wanting and wholly inadequate for 6 years....Fairly sure that'll come back to bite....
Actually take the probably out. She is too stupid. Or blind. Or both.
It'd be interesting to read what Blair and Cameron had planned, and as to why it was discarded.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
There has been a series of pandemic plans established under Blair, Brown and Cameron to deal with what was felt likely to be the emerging threats of pandemics following sars and swine flu. The modelling was done on influenza of course which is different in some regard to covid but much of the principles are the same.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:15 pmMy S-i-L, who holds a fairly senior NHS position, had been saying for the two or three years before Covid arrived that we were due a pandemic for which we were woefully underprepared.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:08 pmShe’s probably too stupid to know that her own government ripped up the pandemic planning that Blair and Cameron’s regimes had in place…you know stuff that was based on what happens in SE Asia….Worthy4England wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:56 pmLol - delighted Boris attack dog has admitted that government pandemic preparations were found wanting and wholly inadequate for 6 years....Fairly sure that'll come back to bite....
Actually take the probably out. She is too stupid. Or blind. Or both.
It'd be interesting to read what Blair and Cameron had planned, and as to why it was discarded.
A pandemic committee was the lynchpin of this to ensure it was linked into government. With the idea being that the response was cascaded down through local public health structures.
The committee as I understand it and as reported was disbanded by Johnson 6 months before the pandemic because he wanted, and I quote ‘the focus to be on Brexit.’.
If you don’t laugh you cry. The other factor being Tories gradual assault on experienced local public health teams and the resultant mess we ended up in trying to do what the likes of S Korea do locally with a national private contract that wasted billions and produced the square root of nothing. If you dismantle public health and strip it away you will be inadequately prepared. If you then remove the structures on which you rely on for reporting back to government then even more so.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
Interesting observation from Nick Robinson - Rules state that
@BorisJohnson
remains leader & is safe for a year if there are fewer than 180 votes against him tonight. History shows that PMs who "win" still end up losing - Thatcher resigned 8 days after winning, May within 6 months & Major lost to Blair in a landslide ...
@BorisJohnson
remains leader & is safe for a year if there are fewer than 180 votes against him tonight. History shows that PMs who "win" still end up losing - Thatcher resigned 8 days after winning, May within 6 months & Major lost to Blair in a landslide ...
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Indeed. It’s pretty hard to continue if you have 100 votes against you, given 160 have paid government positions that means there are only in theory 200 MPs who you aren’t paying….so if half of those vote against you it’s well, the end of the beginning at the very least. For most. But I don’t think it’s so easy to see how Johnson goes because I can’t find a face saving way for it to happen and I suspect an alimighty blood bath if he is pushed.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 3:51 pmInteresting observation from Nick Robinson - Rules state that
@BorisJohnson
remains leader & is safe for a year if there are fewer than 180 votes against him tonight. History shows that PMs who "win" still end up losing - Thatcher resigned 8 days after winning, May within 6 months & Major lost to Blair in a landslide ...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43267
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Politics Thread
The man(woman) who would be king ( P.M.) eh? . In the end, Parliament always make the rules. "Judges are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister, who receives recommendations from a selection commission." ha. The Magna Carta was written against the King (John), not for him.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Not very convincing....
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
A dreadful result for Johnson. Dead man walking. Or he sinks the Tory party for a generation. That’s almost half his MPs don’t have confidence. That’s worse by a distance than May’s result and we know what happened to her.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
I haven't done the numbers but we're abstentions allowed?
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
You can abstain. But nobody did.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:37 pmI haven't done the numbers but we're abstentions allowed?
It’s a secret ballot so not much point in abstaining.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
I just find it a little strange that not a one of them felt in any way unsure. Each of them took what is ultimately a polemic stance one way or t'other.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:50 pmYou can abstain. But nobody did.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:37 pmI haven't done the numbers but we're abstentions allowed?
It’s a secret ballot so not much point in abstaining.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
But the only reason we have abstentions is because politicians don’t want to be seen voting against their own party in public. So they abstain to save embarrassment. I don’t think it’s really because they aren’t sure.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 10:06 pmI just find it a little strange that not a one of them felt in any way unsure. Each of them took what is ultimately a polemic stance one way or t'other.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:50 pmYou can abstain. But nobody did.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:37 pmI haven't done the numbers but we're abstentions allowed?
It’s a secret ballot so not much point in abstaining.
And I’m pretty sure many of the 211 who voted for him didn’t do so for any reason other than they had to in order to keep their job.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14055
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I see the Chief pisscan went ON RECORD with a list of all the donors who have "demanded" that Boris stays in power or they'll cut their funding to MP's... She actually thought this was some kind of rousing speech, that this dozen or so elites are more important than the public
Well, I suppose to them, they are..
Well, I suppose to them, they are..
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I thought it was great she admitted they won the election only because of their donors £18M contribution to the party. They aren’t even pretending anymore that it’s about the country. It’s very much about the Tory party and nothing else matters. What’s more sinister is they’ve tried on a number of occasions to suggest the Tory party success is the same as the country’s success. More than a hint of 1930’s Germany in there.boltonboris wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 10:17 amI see the Chief pisscan went ON RECORD with a list of all the donors who have "demanded" that Boris stays in power or they'll cut their funding to MP's... She actually thought this was some kind of rousing speech, that this dozen or so elites are more important than the public
Well, I suppose to them, they are..
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14055
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
They have turned into a George Orwell novel
Ignore what you have heard them say, ignore what is written before your eyes. It will all be denied. It will be twisted
When May won her VONC with a much bigger margin than 'him', it was declared a defeat for her. Last night, they all proclaimed it as a victory for the leader.
I just hope they all get trapped in a lift together and run out of oxygen
Ignore what you have heard them say, ignore what is written before your eyes. It will all be denied. It will be twisted
When May won her VONC with a much bigger margin than 'him', it was declared a defeat for her. Last night, they all proclaimed it as a victory for the leader.
I just hope they all get trapped in a lift together and run out of oxygen
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36184
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Partying on an industrial scale is a shit line. But this government lie on a scale that you can’t even say is industrial. I’ve never ever ever known a government to shamelessly and brazenly lie on a daily basis. Spin sure. Twist the truth sure. But this brazen and knowing lying is straight out of the Trump playbook. Gaslight the electorate. We know you know we are lying but if we say it enough and lie enough what are you going to do? The fact that so many in the Tory party have been prepared to do this for so long somewhat shocks me. For all their faults they normally at the very least would show some sort of dignity in the face of debauchery. But I fear like Trump the party is stained and corrupted and until they actually kick him and his acolytes out they won’t be able to move forward.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32469
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I am awaiting some dead cats to hit a table near you, shortly. Deflect, bluster and lie.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14055
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Another thing that is concerning me and pissing me right off, is the fact that he and his supporters are being given the opportunity to trivialise this whole thing.. "Slice of Cake / Bit of Karaoke / Couple of leaving drinks"
This Partygate stuff is just a small (but still significant) part of why he should be gone.
The blatant lies and manipulation, the missing money, the blatant corruption, the VIP lanes, the Test & Trace debacle, moving Covid patients into Care homes - That's actual murder!
The list is feckin endless and yet the only shite sticking to him is that he was attending parties. Is it a deliberate ploy to get everything else overlooked?
This Partygate stuff is just a small (but still significant) part of why he should be gone.
The blatant lies and manipulation, the missing money, the blatant corruption, the VIP lanes, the Test & Trace debacle, moving Covid patients into Care homes - That's actual murder!
The list is feckin endless and yet the only shite sticking to him is that he was attending parties. Is it a deliberate ploy to get everything else overlooked?
Last edited by boltonboris on Thu Jun 09, 2022 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests