Music filesharing - a snip at $4.5m
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Music filesharing - a snip at $4.5m
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicbl ... c-industry
Protection of copyright or a slight over-reaction?
Protection of copyright or a slight over-reaction?
Re: Music filesharing - a snip at $4.5m
mehratbert wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicbl ... c-industry
Protection of copyright or a slight over-reaction?
its not that jammie thomas charlie , is it not ?
she has the stupidest brains and stupidester solictor lawyer people ever.
you'dve just paid the $2000 (or $200?) they wanted at first.
the 'fines' have been escalated coz the jurors think shes taking the piss appealing that many tmes.
even the big music folk didnt think it'd go that far.
if you could download the grauiand off bittorrent, i dont think theyd not do nowt similar.
russian roulette fines.
the sistene chapels roof is copyrighted now .
meh
:/
I love the fact everyone shrank in fear in a 'do not post on that topic, they are watching' stylee.
Interesting article from Charlie Boi on it here, that sums up my feelings.
Interesting article from Charlie Boi on it here, that sums up my feelings.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
yeah, but the sistene chapel is copyrighted now. even though its billions of years old.Prufrock wrote:I love the fact everyone shrank in fear in a 'do not post on that topic, they are watching' stylee.
Interesting article from Charlie Boi on it here, that sums up my feelings.
didnt aa millne's family recently sell winnie the pooh to globalmegacorp disney because aa milnes copyright was going to expire because he'd been dead for 70 year and as long as disneycorp is alive (within reason- they have to keep using it) and making money from it , the milnes would be better off doing that.
the photo / painting of a model as art itself should come under either parody or fair use. if carpark or whatever he's called had better info he couldve pushed that angle.
if copyright was that easy (just feed these rules and the info on said case into some computer and a yes or no answer comes out) then they could do that for everything , murder trials and shit. think of the money owd taxpayer would save.
it doesnt look as easy as it seems.
to me anyroad.
Great article.Prufrock wrote:I love the fact everyone shrank in fear in a 'do not post on that topic, they are watching' stylee.
Interesting article from Charlie Boi on it here, that sums up my feelings.
"Don't like modern bands. Topman music, innit?"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests