This is just not right!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
This is just not right!
Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: This is just not right!
Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
Re: This is just not right!
Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
Sto ut Serviam
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: This is just not right!
In modern times though does that stack up? I'm not saying it doesn't. Just wondering like. Nowadays people complain about their jobs and take industrial action, go to the press etc etc. Not sure, that end of the day people in the army will be any different!CAPSLOCK wrote:Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: This is just not right!
Yes, it does - did you see the rules change anywhere? You can't have "collective bargaining" in the armed forces.BWFC_Insane wrote:In modern times though does that stack up? I'm not saying it doesn't. Just wondering like. Nowadays people complain about their jobs and take industrial action, go to the press etc etc. Not sure, that end of the day people in the army will be any different!CAPSLOCK wrote:Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
"Right lads, over the top"
"Feck-off we're having out tea-break - it's not due to finish until 1030"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: This is just not right!
But you know that in 20 years thats exactly where we'll be like it or not!Worthy4England wrote:Yes, it does - did you see the rules change anywhere? You can't have "collective bargaining" in the armed forces.BWFC_Insane wrote:In modern times though does that stack up? I'm not saying it doesn't. Just wondering like. Nowadays people complain about their jobs and take industrial action, go to the press etc etc. Not sure, that end of the day people in the army will be any different!CAPSLOCK wrote:Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
"Right lads, over the top"
"Feck-off we're having out tea-break - it's not due to finish until 1030"
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Re: This is just not right!
Isn't that the "just following orders" excuse that was so ridiculed after World War II?CAPSLOCK wrote:Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: This is just not right!
Are you suggesting we should attempt to reach concensus positions in the middle of a battle?H. Pedersen wrote:Isn't that the "just following orders" excuse that was so ridiculed after World War II?CAPSLOCK wrote:Of course you shouldBWFC_Insane wrote:Hmmm. He has a view and is making his point. From that article it is a bit unclear what his "point" is though....hoboh2o wrote:Honestly! if this bloke felt this strongly about it surely he should have left the feckin' army? I suspect the unfortunate deaths of a few brave lads recently has put the willies up him.
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... =148879923
Its a tough one. You join the army so you know what you are signing up for. But if things happen that you don't like, should you just grin and bear it, or should you take a stand?
The day soldiers start deciding which wars they'll bother with, lunatics and asylums spring to mind
By all means, don't join up - good God I couldn't do the job - or get out as soon as you can, but until that day, get on with it
There were some subtle differences in WWII - the main one being conscription - so there were plenty of people who weren't there voluntarily. I could have some sympathy with these people.
I would expect those people who choose to serve in the forces to follow orders as given.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
World Wars are a vastly different proposition from peace-keeping ones. Neither have any redeeming features but in bothBWFC_Insane wrote:I think WW1 is the classic example of the potential disaster of blindly "following orders".
World wars your country is under attack, not just some one else's. Conscription is also a different proposition to those who join the armed forces as chosen careers. There's no easy answer to any of it, but, in the former, the choice is that of the individual.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38813
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
That wasn't the point though was it?TANGODANCER wrote:World Wars are a vastly different proposition from peace-keeping ones. Neither have any redeeming features but in bothBWFC_Insane wrote:I think WW1 is the classic example of the potential disaster of blindly "following orders".
World wars your country is under attack, not just some one else's. Conscription is also a different proposition to those who join the armed forces as chosen careers. There's no easy answer to any of it, but, in the former, the choice is that of the individual.
Hundreds of thousands of troops in WW1 were sent to their deaths by incompetent generals who had no experience of modern warfare and therefore thought walking slowly in a line was the best way to combat a machine gun. Troops that refused to do that were shot.
Were you there?TANGODANCER wrote:World Wars are a vastly different proposition from peace-keeping ones. Neither have any redeeming features but in bothBWFC_Insane wrote:I think WW1 is the classic example of the potential disaster of blindly "following orders".
World wars your country is under attack, not just some one else's. Conscription is also a different proposition to those who join the armed forces as chosen careers. There's no easy answer to any of it, but, in the former, the choice is that of the individual.

Was right all along
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7042
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:36 am
- Location: HULL, BABY!
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests