fox attack
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32413
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Tsk,
It was obviously the Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog - pictured here in the wild...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... attack.jpg
It was obviously the Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog - pictured here in the wild...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... attack.jpg
I used to live in East London in 2006-7, there were urban foxes everywhere. Their horrific screeching during mating was terrible during the night. It's true that they aren't scared of humans like nearly all other animals, they just stare you down.
Wonder what the relationship is between them and the millions of rats in London too, competing for the same rubbish etc.
Wonder what the relationship is between them and the millions of rats in London too, competing for the same rubbish etc.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8600
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Is it possible that the children were left outside on the patio as it was a warm night and they were attacked there by the fox?
The parents, on hearing the screams, and fearing a Madeleine McCann style furore, transported the kids upstairs and then reported the attack.
Just a hypothesis, but just as feasible as a fox climbing two sets of stairs.
The parents, on hearing the screams, and fearing a Madeleine McCann style furore, transported the kids upstairs and then reported the attack.
Just a hypothesis, but just as feasible as a fox climbing two sets of stairs.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
Lots of conspiracy theories on this, but let's just put this on the bullshitometer.....
Has Max Clifford got involved yet?
If so, we know everything. Move along. please. Don't feed the troll.
If not, then let's just put it down to the fact that something, someone, was able to get into a child's bedroom, without forcible entry, while the parents were in the house. Which could - or could not be, I'm not going to give a view either way until the facts and evidence are put in a concrete way beyond all reasonable doubt - be the fault of the parents, for being blase about their childrens' security.
And that we'll never know, and therefore we should not speculate about it in any way, shape or form until the facts come to light. As we all know, talking about something without painstakingly making it obvious it is either opinion or a joke, is a dangerous thing.
Has Max Clifford got involved yet?
If so, we know everything. Move along. please. Don't feed the troll.
If not, then let's just put it down to the fact that something, someone, was able to get into a child's bedroom, without forcible entry, while the parents were in the house. Which could - or could not be, I'm not going to give a view either way until the facts and evidence are put in a concrete way beyond all reasonable doubt - be the fault of the parents, for being blase about their childrens' security.
And that we'll never know, and therefore we should not speculate about it in any way, shape or form until the facts come to light. As we all know, talking about something without painstakingly making it obvious it is either opinion or a joke, is a dangerous thing.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32413
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Especially when we have not got the benefit of Sky's world experts, who have CLEARLY told us it was foxes after nappies, oh no it wasn't, oh yes it was.KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote:As we all know, talking about something without painstakingly making it obvious it is either opinion or a joke, is a dangerous thing.
You really think that's what someone would do upon seeing their child mauled? "Gee, this'll look bad in the press. You carry them upstairs, and then we'll leave them bleeding there while we clean up all this blood". Really?Gary the Enfield wrote:Is it possible that the children were left outside on the patio as it was a warm night and they were attacked there by the fox?
The parents, on hearing the screams, and fearing a Madeleine McCann style furore, transported the kids upstairs and then reported the attack.
Just a hypothesis, but just as feasible as a fox climbing two sets of stairs.
Again, simplest answer - usually the right one.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
Being a country boy I know full well what a fox can do and will do esp to a run full of chickens, still find it hard to believe it entered a house and went upstairs etc.Bruce Rioja wrote:If you'd ever seen what a fox can do to caged hens in a battery you wouldn't.Raven wrote:No you are not alone at all, stinks to me. I find it hard to believe a fox entered a house let alone went upstairs and climbed into a cot (never knew canines could climb)
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
just to be clear - I am not saying it didn't happen as described - just that the story gives me pause for thought - perhaps unfairly, but it just doesn't sound quite right...
I am also intrigued that the news reports are still using phrases (both I have heard today) like:
"the two girls are making good progress after an apparent fox attack"
"the girls are now thought to be making good progress after an alleged fox attack"
if it is all so obvious and certain - why the equivocation?
I am also intrigued that the news reports are still using phrases (both I have heard today) like:
"the two girls are making good progress after an apparent fox attack"
"the girls are now thought to be making good progress after an alleged fox attack"
if it is all so obvious and certain - why the equivocation?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14046
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36127
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8600
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Call me cynical but, yes, sadly I can see this happening which is why I posted the hypothoesis.Tombwfc wrote:You really think that's what someone would do upon seeing their child mauled? "Gee, this'll look bad in the press. You carry them upstairs, and then we'll leave them bleeding there while we clean up all this blood". Really?Gary the Enfield wrote:Is it possible that the children were left outside on the patio as it was a warm night and they were attacked there by the fox?
The parents, on hearing the screams, and fearing a Madeleine McCann style furore, transported the kids upstairs and then reported the attack.
Just a hypothesis, but just as feasible as a fox climbing two sets of stairs.
Again, simplest answer - usually the right one.
Maybe I've been watching too many NCIS/ CSI programmes.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43240
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Any hints of conspircy theories seem to act like flies/jampots syndromes to media. I really hope, for the parents' sakes this is just a simple "exception to the rule" on fox behaviour and happened as reported. Nothing can undo the event for the poor kids, but anything else is just unthinkably disgusting. Made me think of the dingo dogs case in Australia years back and the furore that caused.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 32413
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43240
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 188 guests