creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36294
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I don't think we were batting yesterday out with 8 wickets in hand - one way or another they were going to get those wickets unless weather intervened. Its so rare nowadays to survive in those scenarios.TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:31 amIf Root and Stokes had managed to make fifty between them (and the time it took to do it, because let's face it,it wasn't about scoring yesterday) we could probably have held out for the draw well enough.) That isn't rocket science either, especially after losing two wickets so quickly. Let's hope we can salvage a bit of pride by winning the last test.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:42 am
A draw was IMO never attainable. Unless the weather helped.
They had 13/14 overs left.
Our supposed best batter in Root averaged 30 in the series.
The failings in our side need to be addressed. You won't win test matches when your top order are averaging in the teens or at best 30. You need players to average 40 plus. Its not rocket science.
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Sir Geoffrey Boycott innit.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43293
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
One we have to take on the chin Dujon. Joe Root's imitation of the Boycott text-book
"forward defensive stroke" got him out for a duck. An imitation of a Stokes wallop wouldn't have been any worse and he might not have been out. Que sera.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9125
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
That conviction was in the French courts wasn't it? Memorable for Boycott complaining in the middle of the hearing that " everyone was talking in French"taddyontoast wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:26 am
He has a conviction for domestic abuse about which he is totally unrepentant and still casts himself as the victim. You won't catch me addressing him as "sir". (I'm sure he'll be devastated by my boycott!)
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
You as a mere mortal may think that's why he has never had one before, but according to the man himself, don't forget, he would've got one if he'd blacked up.taddyontoast wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:26 am
He has a conviction for domestic abuse about which he is totally unrepentant and still casts himself as the victim. You won't catch me addressing him as "sir". (I'm sure he'll be devastated by my boycott!)
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Would have been better doing an Atherton actually Tango.TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:13 amOne we have to take on the chin Dujon. Joe Root's imitation of the Boycott text-book
"forward defensive stroke" got him out for a duck. An imitation of a Stokes wallop wouldn't have been any worse and he might not have been out. Que sera.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:29 am
That conviction was in the French courts wasn't it? Memorable for Boycott complaining in the middle of the hearing that " everyone was talking in French"
yup - the crafty buggers!
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Interesting game for England today. It has a definite end of an era feel to it. We seem to exist on Ashes cycles, and it’s also Bayliss’ last game in charge. My main gripe with this team is that they’ve shown the same failings continually - spineless batting, giving wickets away, and a lack of variety in the bowling. There are a lot of players who seemingly haven’t developed or lived up to potential.
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36294
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Hmm. I definitely think one of Buttler or Bairstow can be retained. Bairstow at times has looked a good test player and Buttler for me is a natural talent - he resisted well in the last test. Buttler especially looks mentally tired from the WC. But I'd not be throwing them both out.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:50 amInteresting game for England today. It has a definite end of an era feel to it. We seem to exist on Ashes cycles, and it’s also Bayliss’ last game in charge. My main gripe with this team is that they’ve shown the same failings continually - spineless batting, giving wickets away, and a lack of variety in the bowling. There are a lot of players who seemingly haven’t developed or lived up to potential.
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
The issue isn't the middle order - its the top 4. Including Root who all have failed this series. If none of your top 4 make runs consistently you will lose more than you win - and it gives your middle order little chance.
Stokes also needs to bat at 3 - he should not be bowled anymore as his bowling is erratic and if we're honest not really test standard. Leach is not a test quality spinner. Broad surely plays.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
My thoughts were really about building a team for 2 years time, at which point I don’t see Broad or Anderson still being around. If we keep picking the same players, we’ll keep seeing the same results.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:17 amHmm. I definitely think one of Buttler or Bairstow can be retained. Bairstow at times has looked a good test player and Buttler for me is a natural talent - he resisted well in the last test. Buttler especially looks mentally tired from the WC. But I'd not be throwing them both out.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:50 amInteresting game for England today. It has a definite end of an era feel to it. We seem to exist on Ashes cycles, and it’s also Bayliss’ last game in charge. My main gripe with this team is that they’ve shown the same failings continually - spineless batting, giving wickets away, and a lack of variety in the bowling. There are a lot of players who seemingly haven’t developed or lived up to potential.
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
The issue isn't the middle order - its the top 4. Including Root who all have failed this series. If none of your top 4 make runs consistently you will lose more than you win - and it gives your middle order little chance.
Stokes also needs to bat at 3 - he should not be bowled anymore as his bowling is erratic and if we're honest not really test standard. Leach is not a test quality spinner. Broad surely plays.
I like Buttler and Bairstow as cricketers but both have underachieved for a long time, and I don’t see anything to suggest either can magically turn it around. Bairstow had one good year, and has averaged 20 for the last 18 months. He’s not the best keeper either. Let Foakes have a go. Buttler has one hundred in 30odd tests, and is playing as a specialist batsman at 7 averaging 20 this year. His lifetime FC average is low 30s - again as good as he is at the white ball game I don’t see how he can be expected to turn into a prolific test batsman.
Leach, id like to see a little more of for now.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 36294
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
The problem is that both Crawley and Sibley average sub 40 in first class cricket - Bairstow averages 44.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:39 amMy thoughts were really about building a team for 2 years time, at which point I don’t see Broad or Anderson still being around. If we keep picking the same players, we’ll keep seeing the same results.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:17 amHmm. I definitely think one of Buttler or Bairstow can be retained. Bairstow at times has looked a good test player and Buttler for me is a natural talent - he resisted well in the last test. Buttler especially looks mentally tired from the WC. But I'd not be throwing them both out.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:50 amInteresting game for England today. It has a definite end of an era feel to it. We seem to exist on Ashes cycles, and it’s also Bayliss’ last game in charge. My main gripe with this team is that they’ve shown the same failings continually - spineless batting, giving wickets away, and a lack of variety in the bowling. There are a lot of players who seemingly haven’t developed or lived up to potential.
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
The issue isn't the middle order - its the top 4. Including Root who all have failed this series. If none of your top 4 make runs consistently you will lose more than you win - and it gives your middle order little chance.
Stokes also needs to bat at 3 - he should not be bowled anymore as his bowling is erratic and if we're honest not really test standard. Leach is not a test quality spinner. Broad surely plays.
I like Buttler and Bairstow as cricketers but both have underachieved for a long time, and I don’t see anything to suggest either can magically turn it around. Bairstow had one good year, and has averaged 20 for the last 18 months. He’s not the best keeper either. Let Foakes have a go. Buttler has one hundred in 30odd tests, and is playing as a specialist batsman at 7 averaging 20 this year. His lifetime FC average is low 30s - again as good as he is at the white ball game I don’t see how he can be expected to turn into a prolific test batsman.
Leach, id like to see a little more of for now.
Sub-40 averages don't translate well in the test game top order generally.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Trescothick and Vaughan both had modest FC records before being called up, but the selectors recognised features of their game that they felt could cope with test cricket.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:05 amThe problem is that both Crawley and Sibley average sub 40 in first class cricket - Bairstow averages 44.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:39 amMy thoughts were really about building a team for 2 years time, at which point I don’t see Broad or Anderson still being around. If we keep picking the same players, we’ll keep seeing the same results.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:17 amHmm. I definitely think one of Buttler or Bairstow can be retained. Bairstow at times has looked a good test player and Buttler for me is a natural talent - he resisted well in the last test. Buttler especially looks mentally tired from the WC. But I'd not be throwing them both out.jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:50 amInteresting game for England today. It has a definite end of an era feel to it. We seem to exist on Ashes cycles, and it’s also Bayliss’ last game in charge. My main gripe with this team is that they’ve shown the same failings continually - spineless batting, giving wickets away, and a lack of variety in the bowling. There are a lot of players who seemingly haven’t developed or lived up to potential.
As a result I’d like to see some big changes going forward for the new coach to build a new hungry side who can develop together over the next couple of years.
Out go Denly, Bairstow, Buttler from the batting. None of them give me any confidence they’ll go on to be players who can average 40 consistently going forwards.
From the bowling there’s an argument to move on from Anderson. I love him, but he’s 37 now and will be returning for a handful of tests at best - why not let someone younger play and develop in those games instead?
Going forwards I’d like to see a team of:
Burns
Sibley
?crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Folkes
Woakes
Curran
Leach
Archer
The issue isn't the middle order - its the top 4. Including Root who all have failed this series. If none of your top 4 make runs consistently you will lose more than you win - and it gives your middle order little chance.
Stokes also needs to bat at 3 - he should not be bowled anymore as his bowling is erratic and if we're honest not really test standard. Leach is not a test quality spinner. Broad surely plays.
I like Buttler and Bairstow as cricketers but both have underachieved for a long time, and I don’t see anything to suggest either can magically turn it around. Bairstow had one good year, and has averaged 20 for the last 18 months. He’s not the best keeper either. Let Foakes have a go. Buttler has one hundred in 30odd tests, and is playing as a specialist batsman at 7 averaging 20 this year. His lifetime FC average is low 30s - again as good as he is at the white ball game I don’t see how he can be expected to turn into a prolific test batsman.
Leach, id like to see a little more of for now.
Sub-40 averages don't translate well in the test game top order generally.
The thing I like about sibley is his concentration - he’s scored 2 big double hundreds and has a SR in the 40s. I think that temperament should give him a good chance of succeeding.
Crawley had a question mark beside him and I’d be happy with altternative suggestions. He seems promising when I’ve seen him though, again good temperament.
I think the focus should now be aiming to have a good team in 2 years, and I think the players I’ve mentioned have more chance of being good test players than the ones I’m leaving out who’ve underachieved for so long without showing any signs of progress. We’ve got a new coach coming in, let’s build a new team.
Edit: I’ve just checked and both Trescothick and Vaughan averaged more in test than championship cricket. Vaughan’s FC average was only 36!
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
We have a new record opening partnership for the series! Congratulations to Rory Burns and Joe Denly for racking up an imposing 27!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Denley's wicket - totally my fault...
turned on cricket - heard that we were 27-0... thought to myself - phew, that sounds OK... next ball, Denley's gone!
turned on cricket - heard that we were 27-0... thought to myself - phew, that sounds OK... next ball, Denley's gone!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43293
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
All very fine if the rest of the cricketing world stands still Jimbo. It won't and we'll still just do the best we can and time will come when Britain is fully found out by sheer numbers amongst the opposition and lose test matches against China, Japan and Korea.. We have territorial numbers from the Berwick to Gretna border line down to King Arthur land,(minus Wales) whilst teams like he Aussies have all the land a herd of kangaroos can leap about in from Darwin To Melbourne and twice that east to west as the map crow flies. We're small potatoes in any international sport (for years we took on and lost Ryder Cups to America ( a country taking on a continent) till England became Europe and sort of balanced the scale a bit. ("Just give me ten (eleven) who are stout-hearted men and I'll soon give you ten thousand more!"...as the song goes ) In short, divine rights stops outside the church doors. Bat on...jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:20 am
I think the focus should now be aiming to have a good team in 2 years, and I think the players I’ve mentioned have more chance of being good test players than the ones I’m leaving out who’ve underachieved for so long without showing any signs of progress. We’ve got a new coach coming in, let’s build a new team.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:04 pm
All very fine if the rest of the cricketing world stands still Jimbo. It won't and we'll still just do the best we can and time will come when Britain is fully found out by sheer numbers amongst the opposition and lose test matches against China, Japan and Korea.. We have territorial numbers from the Berwick to Gretna border line down to King Arthur land,(minus Wales) whilst teams like he Aussies have all the land a herd of kangaroos can leap about in from Darwin To Melbourne and twice that east to west as the map crow flies. We're small potatoes in any international sport (for years we took on and lost Ryder Cups to America ( a country taking on a continent) till England became Europe and sort of balanced the scale a bit. ("Just give me ten (eleven) who are stout-hearted men and I'll soon give you ten thousand more!"...as the song goes ) In short, divine rights stops outside the church doors. Bat on...
^
I'll have some of whatever he's on!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I think you’ve missed my point somewhat. I’m saying we shouldn’t simply stick with what we’ve got now as they’ve underachieved time and time again again, and probably will continue to do so. I think there’d be more benefit to backing a talented group of young players who over a 2 year period with some experience might go on to be far better players than what we’ve got now. It might not work out but at least we’ll have given it a go. There’s a new coach coming in and we’re at the end of an Ashes series, so it feels like a good time to start a new era.TANGODANCER wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:04 pmAll very fine if the rest of the cricketing world stands still Jimbo. It won't and we'll still just do the best we can and time will come when Britain is fully found out by sheer numbers amongst the opposition and lose test matches against China, Japan and Korea.. We have territorial numbers from the Berwick to Gretna border line down to King Arthur land,(minus Wales) whilst teams like he Aussies have all the land a herd of kangaroos can leap about in from Darwin To Melbourne and twice that east to west as the map crow flies. We're small potatoes in any international sport (for years we took on and lost Ryder Cups to America ( a country taking on a continent) till England became Europe and sort of balanced the scale a bit. ("Just give me ten (eleven) who are stout-hearted men and I'll soon give you ten thousand more!"...as the song goes ) In short, divine rights stops outside the church doors. Bat on...jimbo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:20 am
I think the focus should now be aiming to have a good team in 2 years, and I think the players I’ve mentioned have more chance of being good test players than the ones I’m leaving out who’ve underachieved for so long without showing any signs of progress. We’ve got a new coach coming in, let’s build a new team.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I'm somewhere in the middle. Anyone young who looks like they've earned a shot should be in. Sibley, Pope and Curran should all tour and play. Wouldn't be dropping the good performers yet unless we have to though, we haven't got enough!
I think BWFCi is harsh on Stokes bowling, but it does seem obvious his batting is far more important to us than his bowling atm.
Then, do we try to find a proper no.3, then go Root, Pope, Stokes, Wk, Curran, bowlers. Do you try to mould Pope into a 3? Play Stokes there? Or do you bump everyone one and fit another middle order (Roy, Buttler, Bairstow if Foakes is keeping)?
Tough. And Christ knows where we get a spinner from.
I think BWFCi is harsh on Stokes bowling, but it does seem obvious his batting is far more important to us than his bowling atm.
Then, do we try to find a proper no.3, then go Root, Pope, Stokes, Wk, Curran, bowlers. Do you try to mould Pope into a 3? Play Stokes there? Or do you bump everyone one and fit another middle order (Roy, Buttler, Bairstow if Foakes is keeping)?
Tough. And Christ knows where we get a spinner from.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests