The Royal Baby

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
89bwfc89
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1176
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 2:45 pm

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by 89bwfc89 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:59 pm

L-a

Pronounced Ladasha...Queen L-a l


Aww..Shirley is cute :wink:

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by jaffka » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:09 pm

Anyway she is still well worth one

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by David Lee's Hair » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:12 pm

Will we get a day off work?
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:14 pm

David Lee's Hair wrote:Will we get a day off work?
Yes.

Well, I will.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by David Lee's Hair » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:34 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
David Lee's Hair wrote:Will we get a day off work?
Yes.

Well, I will.
2 weeks?
Professionalism, the last refuge of the talentless

jmjhb
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2960
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Xanadu

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by jmjhb » Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:42 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
89bwfc89 wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
David Lee's Hair wrote:
Feel sorry for them to be honest. Heaven forbid anything happen, but the girls not even 12 weeks, so much can go wrong yet, and now the whole world knows...
I've been thinking the same. Bit of a nightmare them having to spill the beans this early on but i guess they had no choice when she went into hosp. So much can go wrong before 12 weeks and i'm quite sure she wouldn't want to have to share a mis-carriage with the world. Still, morning sickness is a sign that the pregnancy hormones are kicking in so thats kind of a good sign (and severe morning sickness is sometimes a sign of twins too! 8) )

As for Bolton Boris and Jaffka, pretty sure they both have kids, dunno if they have daughters but i'd hate to hear anyone speak of my daughter the way those two spoke about Kate.
You reckon they'll just toss a coin for who gets the throne if this is the case? :)
Obviously not - whoever comes out first, wins. :P
What if they come out via C-section?

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:44 pm

jmjhb wrote:
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
89bwfc89 wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
David Lee's Hair wrote:
Feel sorry for them to be honest. Heaven forbid anything happen, but the girls not even 12 weeks, so much can go wrong yet, and now the whole world knows...
I've been thinking the same. Bit of a nightmare them having to spill the beans this early on but i guess they had no choice when she went into hosp. So much can go wrong before 12 weeks and i'm quite sure she wouldn't want to have to share a mis-carriage with the world. Still, morning sickness is a sign that the pregnancy hormones are kicking in so thats kind of a good sign (and severe morning sickness is sometimes a sign of twins too! 8) )

As for Bolton Boris and Jaffka, pretty sure they both have kids, dunno if they have daughters but i'd hate to hear anyone speak of my daughter the way those two spoke about Kate.
You reckon they'll just toss a coin for who gets the throne if this is the case? :)
Obviously not - whoever comes out first, wins. :P
What if it's a Caesarian?!?
That's simple, if the twins are one boy and one girl, then the royal-retainer-in-privy will obviously pluck the boy out first. If they are both the same sex that's when they'll toss a coin.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:45 pm

...or they name 'em Anthony and Declan, and we'll have King Ant & Dec.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by malcd1 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:11 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
David Lee's Hair wrote:Will we get a day off work?
Yes.

Well, I will.
No.

Will will though.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13988
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by boltonboris » Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:16 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
boltonboris wrote:I have a daughter yes..

Doesn't mean I wouldn't want to pork Kate Middleton... She's fit.

Cheer up, petal.
Your 'knock her out & then rape her' line wasn't one of your best though, really, was it. A joke, I know, but still.
Woah.... You'll have to point out where I used the words "rape her" like you've referred to.......
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12940
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:19 pm

boltonboris wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
boltonboris wrote:I have a daughter yes..

Doesn't mean I wouldn't want to pork Kate Middleton... She's fit.

Cheer up, petal.
Your 'knock her out & then rape her' line wasn't one of your best though, really, was it. A joke, I know, but still.
Woah.... You'll have to point out where I used the words "rape her" like you've referred to.......
Quite right, Boris. You only said you'd have to knock her out first then you'd bang her.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13988
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by boltonboris » Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:21 pm

Exactly!!! ;-)

And the line was knock her out TO bang her.... Not that I would..
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by jaffka » Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:27 pm

boltonboris wrote:Exactly!!! ;-)

And the line was knock her out TO bang her.... Not that I would..
sort of like getting her pi**ed out of her tree and filling her head full of s**t so she is sitting there like a nodding dog

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13303
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Hoboh » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:48 pm

I'm happy for the couple

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by jaffka » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:05 pm

Hoboh wrote:I'm happy for the couple
I am as well actually, just keep it a secret yeah.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13818
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by officer_dibble » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:12 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:3 pages already for this wayward blob of royal blue spunk. remarkable.
4 now! some corkers in here though!

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by jaffka » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:20 pm

officer_dibble wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:3 pages already for this wayward blob of royal blue spunk. remarkable.
4 now! some corkers in here though!
aye the royals always a source of controvesy

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:46 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:3 pages already for this wayward blob of royal blue spunk. remarkable.
Late entry for post of the year.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:18 am

General Mannerheim wrote:3 pages already for this wayward blob of royal blue spunk. remarkable.
An edifying constitutional debate briefly threatened.

Oh well. :pissed:
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Royal Baby

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:16 am

I see Paddy Power are offering odds of 1000-1 on the sprog being named Waynetta. That would be the biggest waste of money that anybody could possibly contemplate, there is no way on Earth that they would name 'her' Waynetta. I wouldn't even contemplate putting a quid on at a million to one. Odds of a billion to one and I'd think seriously about it before saying no way.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests