Brexit or Britin

[Lord Kangana]

F*ck me Monty, news travels slowly on your side of the pond.

Everyone over here knows Brexit means Brexit.

[Prufrock]

Still can't believe she actually said "red, white and blue Brexit".

F*ck off.

[Lord Kangana]

To be fair, you can't accuse her of not having a plan now, though, can you?

[Hoboh]

To be fair, you can't accuse her of not having a plan now, though, can you?

Now there is something we can agree on, shits who just don't get on with leaving not telling the moaning ,whinging, remainers to shut the fcuk up or piss off and take EU citizenship in, say Germany next door to their migrant pals!

[Worthy4England]

To be fair, you can't accuse her of not having a plan now, though, can you?

Now there is something we can agree on, shits who just don't get on with leaving not telling the moaning ,whinging, remainers to shut the fcuk up or piss off and take EU citizenship in, say Germany next door to their migrant pals!

How can you possibly be surprised? We did mention there was no fcking plan, often enough.

[Hoboh]

To be fair, you can't accuse her of not having a plan now, though, can you?

Saw this and immediately thought of you.

http://1ifsww39ksbm13izno3q3b45.wpengin ... e050-1.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Lord Kangana]

"All Nigel really wanted for Christmas was a return to rationing and those nice Blue Passports"?

[Hoboh]

I was thinking more along the lines of a remoaners soup kitchen after the leave vote

[Hoboh]

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... ables-show" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'd hazard a guess there are an awful lot more secretive groups like this contained within the happy transparent EU system.

Still, as long as we have stupid folk whose sole ambition it is to be ruled by anyone except one of their own, the EU will stagger on until it reaches the cliff edge.

Happy New Year everyone (and I do mean everyone).

[Hoboh]

Sir Vince Cable, the Lib Dem former business secretary, has become the latest prominent pro-European to come out against EU free movement. The party as a whole has always been strongly committed to free movement, although Theresa May has made to clear that the UK will no longer allow EU workers free movement to the UK after Brexit. But, in an article in the New Statesman, Cable says there is a liberal case for opposing free movement. Many senior Labour figures, including Ed Miliband (here), Yvette Cooper, Andy Burnham, Sir Keir Starmer (here), and Emma Reynolds have also said they now believe that controls on immigration are required. In his article Cable says:

I have serious doubts that EU free movement is tenable or even desirable. First, the freedom is not a universal right, but selective. It does not apply to Indians, Jamaicans, Americans or Australians. They face complex and often harsh visa restrictions. One uncomfortable feature of the referendum was the large Brexit vote among British Asians, many of whom resented the contrast between the restrictions they face and the welcome mat laid out for Poles and Romanians ...
The economics are ambiguous. Seen globally, more migration is undeniably a positive. People moving from high unemployment, low productivity countries to areas of labour scarcity and higher productivity produce economic gains. But the benefits accrue mainly to migrants themselves (and business owners) ...
There is no great argument of liberal principle for free EU movement; the economics is debatable; and the politics is conclusively hostile ...
I do not see much upside in Brexit, but one is the opportunity for a more rational immigration policy.

[Worthy4England]

That's so last year. Red, White and Blue Brexit it is. Move on.

[Hoboh]

That's so last year. Red, White and Blue Brexit it is. Move on.

And the latest;

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... its-errors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Yet, yet, remainers kept telling us how the great and good had spoken!

Trump will be a bigger threat to the UK than leaving the EU if he gets it wrong.

Elections across the EU will shape the future relations with it, not some half wit economists.

[Lord Kangana]

Surely Remainians?

[Hoboh]

Surely Remainians?

Remoaners, some people moan more than porn stars.

[Hoboh]

Ireland’s courts will host an ambitious crowdfunded attempt to refer an appeal to the EU’s highest tribunal about whether the process of Brexit is reversible. A letter before action is being sent to the Irish government on Friday, and it is intended that the application will go before judges in Dublin in the spring.
Meanwhile, the high court in London will hear a claim brought by two sets of claimants arguing that the UK should remain in the European Economic Area after Brexit. The challenge is likely to be heard during the week after next.

PMSL, the thick bastards, do they really, honestly think that remaining in the EEA is in the power of a UK court and not the council of ministers in the EU?

Fcuking knew some of the remoaning snowflakes were a bit thick but this takes the biscuit, crafty lawyers ripping them off, they won't be the ones who end up out of pocket

[Hoboh]

The face of remain

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/a ... ocid=edgsp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(For the information of all snowflakes out there who are either plastic scousers or think the leftie Libs always tell the truth and refuse to read anything that does not suck up to their wet dreams, it is not a link to the Mail, Sun, Express or right wing times!)



A bellend, stealing a living philosopher who must have contributed hugely to the economy with his considered mutterings.

Spend your fcuking ample amounts of leisure time on the matter at hand, out is out!

[BWFC_Insane]

The face of remain

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/a ... ocid=edgsp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(For the information of all snowflakes out there who are either plastic scousers or think the leftie Libs always tell the truth and refuse to read anything that does not suck up to their wet dreams, it is not a link to the Mail, Sun, Express or right wing times!)



A bellend, stealing a living philosopher who must have contributed hugely to the economy with his considered mutterings.

Spend your fcuking ample amounts of leisure time on the matter at hand, out is out!

So a Professor of Philiosphy with a string of high profile publications, founder of a new humanities school and highly respected in his field, isn't worthy of an opinion?

At the absolute least his opinion is as valid as anyone else's.

[Hoboh]

The face of remain

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/a ... ocid=edgsp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(For the information of all snowflakes out there who are either plastic scousers or think the leftie Libs always tell the truth and refuse to read anything that does not suck up to their wet dreams, it is not a link to the Mail, Sun, Express or right wing times!)



A bellend, stealing a living philosopher who must have contributed hugely to the economy with his considered mutterings.

Spend your fcuking ample amounts of leisure time on the matter at hand, out is out!

So a Professor of Philiosphy with a string of high profile publications, founder of a new humanities school and highly respected in his field, isn't worthy of an opinion?

At the absolute least his opinion is as valid as anyone else's.

It really depends on if you think philosophy is anything more than someone's personal ramblings.

Yes he is entitled to a personal opinion but please leave off the 'learned gentleman' tab.

[BWFC_Insane]

It really depends on if you think philosophy is anything more than someone's personal ramblings.

Yes he is entitled to a personal opinion but please leave off the 'learned gentleman' tab.

I don't think you know what philosophy is. Nor how research works. Nor his role across politics. But hey, he doesn't agree with you so easier to just entirely dismiss him.

I don't agree with everything he says. Though he recently did a piece comparing the rise in opinion on the Internet and social media to that of aspects of 1930s history. Which was interesting. You may even agree with some of it. It's on the BBC.

[Prufrock]

It really depends on if you think philosophy is anything more than someone's personal ramblings.

Yes he is entitled to a personal opinion but please leave off the 'learned gentleman' tab.

I don't think you know what philosophy is. Nor how research works. Nor his role across politics. But hey, he doesn't agree with you so easier to just entirely dismiss him.

I don't agree with everything he says. Though he recently did a piece comparing the rise in opinion on the Internet and social media to that of aspects of 1930s history. Which was interesting. You may even agree with some of it. It's on the BBC.

Duh-doi!