Some advice from wiser heads.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
- Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
- Contact:
I wouldn't want to blame 18 year olds for going to university, the chance of going away from home, getting pissed for three years and then with the small possibility of getting a decent job at the end of it seems an attractive option. All of this at the tax payers expense, no less. Worthless as some degrees are, if everyone was given that chance 30 years ago a fair few would have took it.
The system is flawed, but to blame teenagers for exploiting it is the wrong answer. Not once did I hear about vocational course at College or School, the only option that seemed to be pushed was higher education. The point is that schools and colleges are producing individuals without drive and motivation to get into jobs, in fact they're producing the exact opposite, apathetic and lazy pupils because they haven't been pushed academically and haven't been given the full lowdown on what you can do out there.
The system is flawed, but to blame teenagers for exploiting it is the wrong answer. Not once did I hear about vocational course at College or School, the only option that seemed to be pushed was higher education. The point is that schools and colleges are producing individuals without drive and motivation to get into jobs, in fact they're producing the exact opposite, apathetic and lazy pupils because they haven't been pushed academically and haven't been given the full lowdown on what you can do out there.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi
A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde
I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside
A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde
I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
laziness and actually having a job to do.blurred wrote:Errors in here intentional, surely?communistworkethic wrote:Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
as your 7000+ posts suggestcommunistworkethic wrote:laziness and actually having a job to do.blurred wrote:Errors in here intentional, surely?communistworkethic wrote:Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
Delegation and good time management. Just got no bloody staff , sorry "collegeagues", in today.keveh wrote:as your 7000+ posts suggestcommunistworkethic wrote:laziness and actually having a job to do.blurred wrote:Errors in here intentional, surely?communistworkethic wrote:Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
If my memory serves me right, there is a law (named after some bloke, I believe) - much like "Murphy's Law" or "Sod's Law" (yes, I know that one isn't named after a person!) which states that if you make a post which moans about someone else's poor spelling or grammar, your own post will itself display some spelling or grammar glitch.blurred wrote:Errors in here intentional, surely?communistworkethic wrote:Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
I think it was DSB that told me the name of this law once upon a time - what was it called?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 28681
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
I knew it (from Paul McFedries' WordSpy mailout - http://www.wordspy.com) as McKean's Law after an American lexicographer. However, the user-generated content pixies at Wikipedia tell us it has other names...thebish wrote:If my memory serves me right, there is a law (named after some bloke, I believe) - much like "Murphy's Law" or "Sod's Law" (yes, I know that one isn't named after a person!) which states that if you make a post which moans about someone else's poor spelling or grammar, your own post will itself display some spelling or grammar glitch.blurred wrote:Errors in here intentional, surely?communistworkethic wrote:Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
I think it was DSB that told me the name of this law once upon a time - what was it called?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_McKean
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
I agree on Degrees.. and about 5 years ago thought much the same about gcse.. but having had two kids in secondary school for the last 7 years, one now on a vocational college Hnd and the other more scholarly in a traditional sense I think the Dumb down argument over simplifies and misses the point a bit.. My two have brought homework home to their traditional degree educational elite dad who has disciovered that they are studying subject areas he passed his o'levels in before they even get to their two years GCSE studies.. As for course work.. feck me I'd have never made it..communistworkethic wrote:
But that's what the system has created, every Tom, Dick and Harriet is going off to get a degree, doesn't matter what in. So when they apply for jobs, it's almost become a given that it's asked for. Which is nonsence because quite frankly some of the stuff I get from graduates and undergraduates shows me they should be back in school learning who to construct sentences and add up.
Don't let anyone try and kid you that eductation hasn't been dumbed down, the level of literacy in this country is a joke. They made GCSE maths easier, so that kids weren't as stressed by it! FFS, when I was at school they made us sit CSE maths papers aged 12/13 because the O level paper we would be sitting at 16 was so much more difficult.
There's been too much emphasis on league tables and X% of kids having to enter university or pass exams - I mean is it grade G that is classed as passing GCSEs these days? "More kids are getting As than ever before", well if that is the case then something is wrong, either the papers are getting easier or the grading structure is not sufficiently robust to deal with the differentiation required to identify the top performers. When I was at school a C was the minimum pass grade and that's where you would expect the majority of people to be around. Not 50% getting A's that just makes a mockery of the whole thing.
CAPS and others are right about the nature of degrees. It used to be the case that if you had a degree, it meant you were part of an educational elite and you came out with a qualification that was worth something. Nowadays, so what if you've got a degree? You and half the other young adults your age. The courses being undertaken are wishy-washy - Media Studies is the fastest growing course in the country, well it will help you sit on your butt watching "Trisha" while you aren't in work. Universities are shutting down science departments because they can't fill the courses because kids don't think they are sexy enough! Education sexy??? It's not meant to be sexy, it's about learning a good lecturer will make it "sexy" by showing how it applies in everyday life. But of course Media Studies is 8-10 hours a week of lectures, sciences are 20+, why go down the route that involves some work??
Dax, some things will always stand you in good stead - hard work and a willingness to do it, ability to cope with change, ability to deal effectively with people at different levels, ability to listen, ask relevent questions and comprehend and problem solving.
League tables are clearly a bad thing because there is little 'value added' in stats but I think to a great degree kids get better results because broadly speaking they are working harder and for longer than I ever did.. Poor Literacy is as much cultural and social as educational.. They stopped teaching Grammar before I got to senior school.. txt ms word spell check etc has done for an awful lot of spelling and don't start me on punctuation! G may be a pass in GCSE but it won't get you feck all and A to C is what counts for the league tables..
I was fortunate to get my degree part time whilst already working.. I was paying, at a time when many of my peers weren't and I wanted to do it for the sense of achieving and had the added spur or pressure of not wanting to blow the dough so I worked hard. We already had a young family and I had one career already so finishing the course with my little 2-1 was an end in itself.. Whatever you study .. Hallmark warning ..take some time to learn about yourself.. not in some LA self discovery styley but accept your strengths and work on your weaknesses, if you have something you enjoy and are enthusiastic about you will do better at it than sticking at something you feel you should do or feel that others will respect you for..
Its that change the stuff you can and don't fret too much about what you can't thing..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 43261
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
It's a little difficult to comment on today's standards as things have changed so much over fifty years. At one time everything was geared at different job levels. Everyone wanted to be an engineer, architect, teacher etc, and there were apprenticeships to serve to learn trades. I did five years of one day and two evening a week at school in order to pass a City and Guilds course. You got buttons of a wage until you were eighteen (you were then considered an improver as opposed to an apprentice) then another wage scale until you were twenty one and finally became a fully-fledged journeyman.
Today, every kid has visions of being a footballer or pop star until some reality kicks in. University is seen as another reason to avoid getting a full-time job and I don't want anyone to tell me that a lot of University educations don't go to waste because students don't study hard enough. My friend's son, a bright lad, went to University and his mother paid his comfortable little way for four years whilst he became a vodka addict. He then left and decided not to carry on. He finished up on the checkout at Asda. Okay, he has now seen the light and put his education to use and works in a bank. His story is not unique. I'm lucky, two of my kids got degrees and used them. Both work for solicitors and are doing fine. The range of work has changed drastically with much less emphasis on the manual end and more on office-orientated employment. But there are still a lot of young who see it all as a pleasure cruise to be enjoyed and wory about later. That, I'm afraid, is the fault of the system, TV and computers. Those who advocate a return to the three "R's" are, in my opinion, not far from being absolutely right.
Today, every kid has visions of being a footballer or pop star until some reality kicks in. University is seen as another reason to avoid getting a full-time job and I don't want anyone to tell me that a lot of University educations don't go to waste because students don't study hard enough. My friend's son, a bright lad, went to University and his mother paid his comfortable little way for four years whilst he became a vodka addict. He then left and decided not to carry on. He finished up on the checkout at Asda. Okay, he has now seen the light and put his education to use and works in a bank. His story is not unique. I'm lucky, two of my kids got degrees and used them. Both work for solicitors and are doing fine. The range of work has changed drastically with much less emphasis on the manual end and more on office-orientated employment. But there are still a lot of young who see it all as a pleasure cruise to be enjoyed and wory about later. That, I'm afraid, is the fault of the system, TV and computers. Those who advocate a return to the three "R's" are, in my opinion, not far from being absolutely right.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
University has changed in many ways...
when I went - (mumble, mumble, many years ago, mumble) - Students were famous for dossing around all day (and shagging all night) - and when they weren't doing that it was politics - marches, demos..
at Uni I did hardly any work in my first two years - they didn't count towards my degree (Maths & Stats). My tutor told me if I worked really really hard in year three I might scrape a 2-1 and if I carried on as I was I'd come out with a Desmond. I settled for the Desmond..
nowadays students don't really do politics - they don't campaign on behalf of anything (except themselves occasionally) and they have to work in years one and two as well as three - and they don't get it all funded by the govt. like I did (including supplementary benefit, and housing benefit in the summer holidays - remember that!!)
Many of them are doing micky-mouse degrees - and there are probably loads there who shouldn't be there. What I'm not sure about is whether University is still the mind-expanding experience that it used to be... (because of the politics and the all-night discussions about Marxism - and the Che Guevara posters!) - or whether I'm simply turning into a grumpy old man remembering the good-old-days through rose-tinted glasses...
when I went - (mumble, mumble, many years ago, mumble) - Students were famous for dossing around all day (and shagging all night) - and when they weren't doing that it was politics - marches, demos..
at Uni I did hardly any work in my first two years - they didn't count towards my degree (Maths & Stats). My tutor told me if I worked really really hard in year three I might scrape a 2-1 and if I carried on as I was I'd come out with a Desmond. I settled for the Desmond..
nowadays students don't really do politics - they don't campaign on behalf of anything (except themselves occasionally) and they have to work in years one and two as well as three - and they don't get it all funded by the govt. like I did (including supplementary benefit, and housing benefit in the summer holidays - remember that!!)
Many of them are doing micky-mouse degrees - and there are probably loads there who shouldn't be there. What I'm not sure about is whether University is still the mind-expanding experience that it used to be... (because of the politics and the all-night discussions about Marxism - and the Che Guevara posters!) - or whether I'm simply turning into a grumpy old man remembering the good-old-days through rose-tinted glasses...
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
You guys sure knew how to party.University has changed in many ways...
when I went - (mumble, mumble, many years ago, mumble) - Students were famous for dossing around all day (and shagging all night) - and when they weren't doing that it was politics - marches, demos..
at Uni I did hardly any work in my first two years - they didn't count towards my degree (Maths & Stats). My tutor told me if I worked really really hard in year three I might scrape a 2-1 and if I carried on as I was I'd come out with a Desmond. I settled for the Desmond..
nowadays students don't really do politics - they don't campaign on behalf of anything (except themselves occasionally) and they have to work in years one and two as well as three - and they don't get it all funded by the govt. like I did (including supplementary benefit, and housing benefit in the summer holidays - remember that!!)
Many of them are doing micky-mouse degrees - and there are probably loads there who shouldn't be there. What I'm not sure about is whether University is still the mind-expanding experience that it used to be... (because of the politics and the all-night discussions about Marxism - and the Che Guevara posters!) - or whether I'm simply turning into a grumpy old man remembering the good-old-days through rose-tinted glasses...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
You can't beat a good Communist Party!!superjohnmcginlay wrote:You guys sure knew how to party.University has changed in many ways...
when I went - (mumble, mumble, many years ago, mumble) - Students were famous for dossing around all day (and shagging all night) - and when they weren't doing that it was politics - marches, demos..
at Uni I did hardly any work in my first two years - they didn't count towards my degree (Maths & Stats). My tutor told me if I worked really really hard in year three I might scrape a 2-1 and if I carried on as I was I'd come out with a Desmond. I settled for the Desmond..
nowadays students don't really do politics - they don't campaign on behalf of anything (except themselves occasionally) and they have to work in years one and two as well as three - and they don't get it all funded by the govt. like I did (including supplementary benefit, and housing benefit in the summer holidays - remember that!!)
Many of them are doing micky-mouse degrees - and there are probably loads there who shouldn't be there. What I'm not sure about is whether University is still the mind-expanding experience that it used to be... (because of the politics and the all-night discussions about Marxism - and the Che Guevara posters!) - or whether I'm simply turning into a grumpy old man remembering the good-old-days through rose-tinted glasses...
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm
Stalin n Lenin dont look too impressed.superjohnmcginlay wrote:You guys sure knew how to party.University has changed in many ways...
when I went - (mumble, mumble, many years ago, mumble) - Students were famous for dossing around all day (and shagging all night) - and when they weren't doing that it was politics - marches, demos..
at Uni I did hardly any work in my first two years - they didn't count towards my degree (Maths & Stats). My tutor told me if I worked really really hard in year three I might scrape a 2-1 and if I carried on as I was I'd come out with a Desmond. I settled for the Desmond..
nowadays students don't really do politics - they don't campaign on behalf of anything (except themselves occasionally) and they have to work in years one and two as well as three - and they don't get it all funded by the govt. like I did (including supplementary benefit, and housing benefit in the summer holidays - remember that!!)
Many of them are doing micky-mouse degrees - and there are probably loads there who shouldn't be there. What I'm not sure about is whether University is still the mind-expanding experience that it used to be... (because of the politics and the all-night discussions about Marxism - and the Che Guevara posters!) - or whether I'm simply turning into a grumpy old man remembering the good-old-days through rose-tinted glasses...
You can't beat a good Communist Party!!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
I'm doing Maths, and I've swopped to the four year Masters degree to try to make it look better to employers. But getting work experience is important too - I'm in my penultimate year and am desparately looking for a summer job with a professional company rather than manual labour work.
You need an impressive subject to make you look good to employers.
You need an impressive subject to make you look good to employers.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
On a sidenote i remember when i was younger people uses to say " when you finish school you wont like it and you'll wish you were back at school". I uses to baffled as to how they could make such a comment, but now i realise, when you are at school. life is so easy not a worry in the world.
Now im 16 have to make all these decisions, get a part time job and so on. And Im sure life is a hell of a lot more complicated for some of you on here.
Now im 16 have to make all these decisions, get a part time job and so on. And Im sure life is a hell of a lot more complicated for some of you on here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 94 guests