Russel Brand

FD · Post by FD » Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:13 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
FD wrote:

That teaches me to attempt a harmless bit of banter!
Hey, I forgot the smiley. No offence taken I can assure you.

Speak for yourself, I am deeply offended and will be complaining to F.L.A.N.G.E. immediately.

(Fathers Legion Against Not Generating Emoticons)

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm

I have taken offence, i didn't hear the broadcast, i haven't even been bothered to click that link to even find out what it is about, but i say SACK HIM. Bring back Mary Whitehouse!

Talk about a witch hunt.

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:40 pm

Will you all stop posting on this thread

Every new post and Im forced back on the off chance Brand is dead

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:03 pm

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote:The pitchforks were sharpened and litlong ago, weren't they?

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/14 ... dio-2.html

"Sick"? "X-Rated"? Dear God.

I feel sorry for these journos. They must lead very sheltered and politically correct lives.

In fact, here's a recent snap of those covering this Woss article in the staff canteen:

It's all very petty reactionist drivel, written by a load of hypocrites

Apparently edited out of the show on Fri (Woss) was a joke about the size of his biceps and a sexually suggestive remark why one was bigger than the other

I'm sorry but I hear jokes like that in the pub every Friday/Saturday, and you're not telling me a publication with the level of the NOTW's employee's never stoop to that level of toilet humour

You want to do an "undercover" on them out together at a weekend: "NOTW reporter in shock use of swear word"

See also the "Moyles/Auschwitz" story
See also the "Prince Harry/p***" story

Rant over, and sorry to CAPS that he's had to read this. To summarise, Brand is not dead

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:07 pm

Maybe next time

I live in hope........

Prufrock · Post by **Prufrock** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:16 pm

An update specially for you CAPS. I have just checked, and Russel Brand is alive. More updates later on Russel Brand (a)Live

Lord Kangana · Post by **Lord Kangana** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:27 pm

Can insult who he likes fo me, just don't find him that funny, have never understood why a poor mans John Inman/Kenneth Williams is considered worth all the hassle.

Daxter · Post by **Daxter** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:14 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Will you all stop posting on this thread

Every new post and Im forced back on the off chance Brand is dead

Classy.

Zulus Thousand of em · Post by **Zulus Thousand of em** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:30 am

I'm struggling to see how anyone can defend the tosser. He is a West Ham fan, when all's said and done.

InsaneApache · Post by **InsaneApache** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:07 am

As in not all tossers are West Ham fans but......????

ratbert · Post by **ratbert** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:44 am

Put it this way, being a fan of the 1966 World Cup Winners isn't exactly an endearing feature.

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:41 am

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:I'm struggling to see how anyone can defend the tosser. He is a West Ham fan, when all's said and done.

Looks like an open and shut case to me.

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:24 pm

Zulus Thousand of em wrote:I'm struggling to see how anyone can defend the tosser. He is a West Ham fan, when all's said and done.

Don't get me wrong, there's things that have been said and done that are indefensible. I'm just extremely bemused by the paper doing the witch-hunting. I hardly think they're clean-mouthed angels

Put it this way, underneath an article slating Brand for his foul comments to Mr Sachs, they proceed to show pics of a dozen women he's bedded. Now where's the difference there? One rings a grandad and slips it into conversation, the other names and shames also.

InsaneApache · Post by **InsaneApache** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:26 pm

Brand 'slips it in' conversation!

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:29 pm

InsaneApache wrote:Brand 'slips it in' conversation!

Yeah but if he's not careful he will be the one getting f###ed in the end

superjohnmcginlay · Post by **superjohnmcginlay** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:32 pm

There's a very simple solution to all this bollox. Shoot the pair of 'em. Then the papers cant go on about it and even better we won't have to hear from either of the c*nts. Job done.

FD · Post by FD » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:56 pm

Daxter wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Will you all stop posting on this thread

Every new post and Im forced back on the off chance Brand is dead
Classy.

Well quite...but I'm sure he doesn't actually mean it...

superjohnmcginlay wrote:There's a very simple solution to all this bollox. Shoot the pair of 'em. Then the papers cant go on about it and even better we won't have to hear from either of the c*nts. Job done.

A victory for freedom of speech right there people!

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:58 pm

Indeed

Twas a joke

Very, very unpleasant joke, but hey ho, he started it

Alls fair game for Brand

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:33 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Indeed

Twas a joke

Very, very unpleasant joke, but hey ho, he started it

Alls fair game for Brand

To be fair Caps' joke made me laugh far more than I ever have done at Russell Brands "humour".

CrazyHorse · Post by **CrazyHorse** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:40 am

Join the club here. They could do with the support.

Connect with your social network account

Russel Brand

Who is online