What are you watching tonight?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Watch it. It isn't really a film as much a feature length Malcolm orientated episode, with a couple of brilliant exchanges, particularly Malcolm vs James Gandolfi. Takes a little while to get into the fact its the same actors playing different characters. However they are essentially the same characters with different names. Chris Addison and Capaldi are excellent.jimbo wrote:Fantastic isn't it? Like you, the first time I saw it was this series, but have since bought the first series and the specials and caught up. I'm yet to see In the Loop though, and am nervous about doing so. Anyone able to tell me whether it lives up to the high standards of the series?Dr Hotdog wrote:Oh man.
I'm watching The Thick of It on Iplayer. Up to Episode 5 at Radio5Live so far and it's probably the best thing I've ever seen.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Thanks, I'll have to dig that out from somewhere soon then. Looking forward to it!Prufrock wrote:Watch it. It isn't really a film as much a feature length Malcolm orientated episode, with a couple of brilliant exchanges, particularly Malcolm vs James Gandolfi. Takes a little while to get into the fact its the same actors playing different characters. However they are essentially the same characters with different names. Chris Addison and Capaldi are excellent.jimbo wrote:Fantastic isn't it? Like you, the first time I saw it was this series, but have since bought the first series and the specials and caught up. I'm yet to see In the Loop though, and am nervous about doing so. Anyone able to tell me whether it lives up to the high standards of the series?Dr Hotdog wrote:Oh man.
I'm watching The Thick of It on Iplayer. Up to Episode 5 at Radio5Live so far and it's probably the best thing I've ever seen.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
General Mannerheim wrote:i thought in the loop was toss?
Not really, just as Prufrock said it's little more than a feature length episode and that's the only reason a couple of critics didn't give it mega thumbs up.
I love the thick of it, bent double when Malcolm opened his birthday cake and it said "happy birthday c**t"
"This could be from anyone." Love it!hisroyalgingerness wrote:General Mannerheim wrote:i thought in the loop was toss?
Not really, just as Prufrock said it's little more than a feature length episode and that's the only reason a couple of critics didn't give it mega thumbs up.
I love the thick of it, bent double when Malcolm opened his birthday cake and it said "happy birthday c**t"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
General Mannerheim wrote:Has anyone watched 'Outnumbered'??? 3 seasons in apparently? cleaned up at tonight's comedy awards anyway!
might have to have a word with my man with the torrents!
Also, in the loop won best comedy film! i just didnt get it, but ive never watched the thick of it either - might give it another bash!
yeah - I loved Outnumbered - great stuff! add it to your christmas list...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Tonight I watched episode two of the History of Russian Art on BBC four, while shivering through a cold and whisky toddy (poor me!)...
Fantastic. We've now got up to the 19th Century and the programme majored on 'The Wanderers' a group of dissident artists who formed in 1863...
I believe at that time they viewed themselves as Russian Art's One and Only Wanderers...
More on the Great Art Debate for anyone interested...
This was a seriously good programme, ending in 1916. I guess the next ep will start in 1917. what happened then?
Fantastic. We've now got up to the 19th Century and the programme majored on 'The Wanderers' a group of dissident artists who formed in 1863...
I believe at that time they viewed themselves as Russian Art's One and Only Wanderers...
More on the Great Art Debate for anyone interested...
This was a seriously good programme, ending in 1916. I guess the next ep will start in 1917. what happened then?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
ta for the tip off on this one, was added to LOVEFiLM - just watching disc 1 now! its great.William the White wrote:On the sofa, beneah a duvet, with cough mixture, strepsils and, later on, whisky and lemon and honey...
Watched all three hours 25 mins of Scorsese's mammoth tribute to Dylan, No direction home... Fantastic...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Watched The Turin Shroud-The new evidence.
Seems the scientists are not quite so sure now in the light of rcent developments. It's quite conclusive that the fragments they tested were from an area repaired after a fifteenth century fire. Now they're doing more tests after high tech. photography proves that the image couldn't possibly be any form of pigment, ie, painted on, and has three dimensional depth that means it can only be from a real person. Fascinating programme.
Seems the scientists are not quite so sure now in the light of rcent developments. It's quite conclusive that the fragments they tested were from an area repaired after a fifteenth century fire. Now they're doing more tests after high tech. photography proves that the image couldn't possibly be any form of pigment, ie, painted on, and has three dimensional depth that means it can only be from a real person. Fascinating programme.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests