The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

superjohnmcginlay
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3057
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm

Post by superjohnmcginlay » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:16 pm

Oh and the milk thingy. Harold Wilson started that. Git.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34744
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:29 pm

superjohnmcginlay wrote:Oh and the milk thingy. Harold Wilson started that. Git.
Indeed he did. He however didn't snatch MY milk. Not put me out of work as a Milk Monitor.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:49 pm

You were a milk monitor at Primary School, I guess

Did I not recently read that Thatcher was against the removal of school milk to Primary School kids?

Thatcher became Queen in 1979...the unions who were 'under control' had had rubbish piled high in the streets, no fcuker putting fires out and bodies queued outside the mortuaries not that long before
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34744
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:58 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:You were a milk monitor at Primary School, I guess

Did I not recently read that Thatcher was against the removal of school milk to Primary School kids?

Thatcher became Queen in 1979...the unions who were 'under control' had had rubbish piled high in the streets, no fcuker putting fires out and bodies queued outside the mortuaries not that long before
To point one - yes.

To point two - I believe so - but she didn't have the balls to tough her position out with Uncle Ted.

To point three - not sure what you're saying here. I said (assuming it's directed towards me) that the Union issue was all but over in the early part of the 80's. She'd already taken on most of them by the time the Miners strike kicked off in 84.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:47 pm

Point 2 - you have to lose some battles to win the war?

Point 3 - we had a second 'Gulf War' cos we didn't finish the first one....
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Point 2 - you have to lose some battles to win the war?

Point 3 - we had a second 'Gulf War' cos we didn't finish the first one....
Or, point 3, we had a second 'Gulf War' because George W. is a fundamentalist nitwit, who lied to his people about weapons of mass destruction and engaged in an illegal conflict. Ably assisted of course by big Tony.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:27 pm

There wouldn't have been an Iraq to fight over if we'd done the job reet in the first place- pity Sir Margaret wasn't PM then

Then we wouldn't be tossing off over whether it was legal or not

Its a cold, harsh world out there where folk don't play by the rules
Sto ut Serviam

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:39 pm

She was, however, PM when we sold all those arms to him and helped him build his power base. Then we had to waste money and lives sorting out that which we shoudn't have been meddling in in the first place. Its a cold hard world etc. etc
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:43 pm

Meddling in?

Somebody wanted to buy something

We sold it to them

Its the way of the world

Selling goods and services for profit

You know, like you do

It created employment anyroad, without any worries over whether it made sense...bit like the British mines under Labour
Last edited by CAPSLOCK on Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sto ut Serviam

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:46 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:She was, however, PM when we sold all those arms to him and helped him build his power base. Then we had to waste money and lives sorting out that which we shoudn't have been meddling in in the first place. Its a cold hard world etc. etc
We sell arms to the Americans.... For massive, ginormous sums. what if they 'turned ugly' 10 years into the future
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:48 pm

If you knew anything about the subject, you'd be frightening. We sold him arms to fight Iran, as the Americans were scared of the two being friends, seeing as they own about 85% of the wolrds oil between them.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:52 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:If you knew anything about the subject, you'd be frightening. We sold him arms to fight Iran, as the Americans were scared of the two being friends, seeing as they own about 85% of the wolrds oil between them.
As I was around at the time, not reading about it later, I know the background, thank you very much
Sto ut Serviam

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:55 pm

So you won't need me to explain how hypocritical your post was then.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34744
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:57 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Point 2 - you have to lose some battles to win the war?

Point 3 - we had a second 'Gulf War' cos we didn't finish the first one....
And this has precisely what, to do with when the Unions were defeated?

I would suggest fcuk all.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:00 pm

I don't need you to (try to) explain anything to me

Hypocritical - coming from the Pomagne socialist, thats rich
Sto ut Serviam

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:01 pm

I'll leave that to The Sun, eh?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:02 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Point 2 - you have to lose some battles to win the war?

Point 3 - we had a second 'Gulf War' cos we didn't finish the first one....
And this has precisely what, to do with when the Unions were defeated?

I would suggest fcuk all.
I thought you'd have worked me out by now

Point being they still had one or two dinosaurs knocking about

It was best to take 'em out while they were weak not let them recover and re-arm
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34744
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:15 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Point 2 - you have to lose some battles to win the war?

Point 3 - we had a second 'Gulf War' cos we didn't finish the first one....
And this has precisely what, to do with when the Unions were defeated?

I would suggest fcuk all.
I thought you'd have worked me out by now

Point being they still had one or two dinosaurs knocking about

It was best to take 'em out while they were weak not let them recover and re-arm
So in my original post I said
W4E wrote:The Union issue was all but over in the early part of the 80's. It needed some challenging - of that I have no doubt.
So apart from picking random bits from threads, you seem to be concurring with my original assertion?

We still have unions today, I think they still play a role.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:23 pm

What does 'challenging' mean

They do - they fund their members EL claims
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34744
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:33 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:What does 'challenging' mean

They do - they fund their members EL claims
Just make something up that suits your line of thinking - you usually do. :-)

When push comes to shove, you can't have the Unions running the business. That said, there's plenty of improvements that Unions have campaigned for, that have been to the benefit of all.

I did have the balls to put the concept that no compulsory redundancy clauses were outmoded to a large collection of Trade's Unionists in the 1980s in the Winter Gardens in Blackpool - it wasn't universally welcomed. :cry:

But nor do I believe that destroying them completely is a good thing either.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests