Today I'm angry about.....
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Hey, I'm talking " All creatures great and small", not blxxdy Rambo.Puskas wrote:Are you sure you want to be, though?TANGODANCER wrote:Our mutt now apparently suffers from hay fever.![]()
Quick visit o the vets, injection, tablets and a quick check: "That'll be eighty pounds sir!" I want to be a vet.
Wouldn't it mean you spend all your time wandering about in a sullen daze, suffering flashbacks to your time in 'Nam?
Then, at some point, you may get involved in an ill-coceived attempt to go on an undercover mission to rescue former comrades who are MIA and still held prisoner there.
I'm not sure I'd want that.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
You see, the thing that gets me with this is that Fulham had an equally long journey to get to Hamburg. Toulouse RL spent 25 hours on the road last week rocking up at St Helens a full 2 hours before kick off. Them there scousers have nothing to moan about.thebish wrote:All the whining about the nightmare those poor Liverpool players have had...
can you IMAGINE how tough it must have been to travel first class train and luxury coach??
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
There are bunches of flowers piling up outside Lime Street as we speak.jimbo wrote:You see, the thing that gets me with this is that Fulham had an equally long journey to get to Hamburg. Toulouse RL spent 25 hours on the road last week rocking up at St Helens a full 2 hours before kick off. Them there scousers have nothing to moan about.thebish wrote:All the whining about the nightmare those poor Liverpool players have had...
can you IMAGINE how tough it must have been to travel first class train and luxury coach??
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?Gary the Enfield wrote:The BBC?BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
They all have agendas. All of them. The BBC are not independent. At all.BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?Gary the Enfield wrote:The BBC?BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
They are in the fact they are funded by the TV licence as opposed to Murdoch. When you watch Sky or many of the American news channels you realise how lucky we are to have an independent news service such as the BBC.Gary the Enfield wrote:They all have agendas. All of them. The BBC are not independent. At all.BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?Gary the Enfield wrote:The BBC?BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote: We need something to balance the BBC
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me which party the BBC are supposedly favouring this election!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Insane ... are you mad ??BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?
Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.
Really, really, do you not see it ?
Wow !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.bobo the clown wrote:Insane ... are you mad ??BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?
Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.
Really, really, do you not see it ?
Wow !!
Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.BWFC_Insane wrote:Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.bobo the clown wrote:Insane ... are you mad ??BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBCBWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?
Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.
Really, really, do you not see it ?
Wow !!
Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Then we may just have to agree that my view irrates you and yours amazes me.Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.
l&k's xxxx
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
So what you're saying is anyone who is paid cannot be independent?Gary the Enfield wrote:I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.BWFC_Insane wrote:Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.bobo the clown wrote:Insane ... are you mad ??BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBC
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?
Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.
Really, really, do you not see it ?
Wow !!
Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.
Thats just nonsense. The BBC have charters and rules governing their independence.
They aren't owned by one bloke who tells them which way to slant their coverage. The BBC are actually paid for by us. We pay the licence fee. And they have a charter to promise that they will report things "independently".
Are they perfect? No. But find me a better news outlet!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38829
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Go over all the other senior journo's & producers over the past 15 years & the depths of New Labourism they have evidenced. It vastly outweighs anything this one guy can be achieving.BWFC_Insane wrote:You still haven't told me why this supposedly "labour" biased BBC would have Nick Robinson as their chief political editor!bobo the clown wrote:Then we may just have to agree that my view irrates you and yours amazes me.Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.
l&k's xxxx
It's the fact that you, very obviously, just simply don't see this at all which I find amazing.
Or maybe I just prefer to irritate you !

Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
BWFC had a customers charter stating that, amongst other things, new Home kits would be produced every two seasons. Don't be so bloody naive.BWFC_Insane wrote:So what you're saying is anyone who is paid cannot be independent?Gary the Enfield wrote:I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.BWFC_Insane wrote:Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.bobo the clown wrote:Insane ... are you mad ??BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!
And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?
Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.
Really, really, do you not see it ?
Wow !!
Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.
Thats just nonsense. The BBC have charters and rules governing their independence.
They aren't owned by one bloke who tells them which way to slant their coverage. The BBC are actually paid for by us. We pay the licence fee. And they have a charter to promise that they will report things "independently".
Are they perfect? No. But find me a better news outlet!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests