The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm
Bit extreme for a wannabe politician, but the little gobbing bastard deserved a slap right enough.CAPSLOCK wrote:Fire with fire n all thatBruce Rioja wrote:Nice debating skills on show here by the BNP's candidate for Romford![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/ ... 663681.stm
Well, of the couple dozen people at the polling station just now, nearly everyone was under 30.. So that's good I guess.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Rumour is that Ed Balls' constituency could well serve up tonight's Portillo moment.
That would be enjoyable.
Jacqui Smith even more vulnerable and even an outside chance of Darling going down... neither as exciting as Balls though.
That would be enjoyable.
Jacqui Smith even more vulnerable and even an outside chance of Darling going down... neither as exciting as Balls though.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.
http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Ratbert has said exactly what I'm thinking.Lord Kangana wrote:Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.
http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
ratbert wrote:
I'll predict the Conservatives short by between 25 and 9 seats and Brown trying to strike a deal with the Lib Dems tomorrow whilst the Tories say they have first dibs on power.
Whatever happens it won't be dull!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
I'm much the same, Tories with c.300 seats, but to be the largest party. UKIP to make a decent move in the popular vote, but of course unable to secure a seat.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ratbert has said exactly what I'm thinking.Lord Kangana wrote:Ok, I'm bored, so whats everyone's completely unscientific gut feeling? I'm going with a small Conservative majority that wil lead to a rerun within a couple of years to attempt a greater majority.
http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/05 ... l-tonight/
ratbert wrote:
I'll predict the Conservatives short by between 25 and 9 seats and Brown trying to strike a deal with the Lib Dems tomorrow whilst the Tories say they have first dibs on power.
Whatever happens it won't be dull!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
I think all the fringe parties will poll well this time. Sadly I fear this particular window of opportunity to implement a fairer more representative voting system will slam shut for another generation.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
I so hope not - but the last polls indicated the shakiness of the Lib Dem vote, and that has to hold up if the current parliament is to be well and truly hung...Lord Kangana wrote:I think all the fringe parties will poll well this time. Sadly I fear this particular window of opportunity to implement a fairer more representative voting system will slam shut for another generation.
I want PR like I want the whites to win the FA Cup...

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Yeah ... why ??TANGODANCER wrote:Why exactly?Athers wrote:Well, of the couple dozen people at the polling station just now, nearly everyone was under 30.. So that's good I guess.
"Oldies of the World Unite ... we've nothing to lose but our zimmers".
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
hats a largley irrelevant question. The political parties we have at present reflect the system they operate within. Change the system, change the parties.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
I think Athers is pleased with his narrow sample of evidence that the group that traditionally has the lowest turnout appears to have been engaged by this election.


Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Yes, I accept that a changed system would mean changed parties.Lord Kangana wrote:hats a largley irrelevant question. The political parties we have at present reflect the system they operate within. Change the system, change the parties.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
I'm still interested in who you would have voted for, given what's on offer now.
But the next question is obviously - what is it that you would like a changed system to produce for you to vote for?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
A new party to the left of Labour which would certainly emerge as it has elsewhere in Europe, prioritising environmental concerns, social justice and human rights. I think it's possible to imagine a group like this obtaining just over a notional 5% 'threshold'.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... those of you who want PR - who would you have liked to vote for?
You know, me and my mates, the usual motley collection of tree huggers, bleeding hearts, do gooders and nanny-staters who only advocate political correctness gone mad and obscene violence on the streets against the friendly hymn-singers of the EDL and BNP.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
In a constituency based polling system, only major parties can ever hope to have a say in government. Which leads to tactical voting and all its idiocy. I understand exactly why the Tories are running scared from it, despite all the gloss and spin of their argument, its because the majority of this country vote for left of centre and left wing, vaguely social democratic parties. With PR, the Tories would be wiped out as a major force in a heartbeat. Ergo, our present system is unrepresentative of the majority wish of our country.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:04 pm
Read an opinion in a paper today against proportional representation which basically said "6% of voters are BNP and if we adopted proportional representation they'd get 30 seats" or whatever.Lord Kangana wrote:In a constituency based polling system, only major parties can ever hope to have a say in government. Which leads to tactical voting and all its idiocy. I understand exactly why the Tories are running scared from it, despite all the gloss and spin of their argument, its because the majority of this country vote for left of centre and left wing, vaguely social democratic parties. With PR, the Tories would be wiped out as a major force in a heartbeat. Ergo, our present system is unrepresentative of the majority wish of our country.
Big "so what". If that represents how the country thinks so be it. You can't fudge the counting of votes to ensure the big two swing power from side to side.
And all the scaremongering for hung parliament. Same again. If no party and their scallywag policies have earned a majority then why should they have the power.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests