The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Just don't leave me with 5 years of having to listen to Michael Gove please.ratbert wrote:Apparently the bags don't belong to Brown or Darling, but the police. Presumably the new team brings its own force in?Verbal wrote:bags being loaded into gvt cars at the back of number ten, ministers heading into number 10 (a farewell?), Prescott calling for an alliance with the liberals (something he has campaigning against forever), labour ministers and lib dem negotiators/spokespersons saying that labour aren't offering a viable alternative to the tory offer.
Bell tolling.
Well, if its looking the way its looking, at least my 'team' (yellows) have finally made power, albeit with the team (blue) I like least. But the Labour deal wasn't a runner in any way shape or form. I suppose many of the blue team proposals I dislike most might be checked. We'll see; it won't be dull, however long it lasts.
Cabinet rumours are six Lib Dem ministers with Nick as deputy PM. I've got images of St Vince running rings around poor little Osborne if they're in the Treasury together.
this is betterVerbal wrote:So no one's been chatting about Brown's resignation and Cameron becoming our new Overlord?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/ ... 675355.stm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
I actually quite like Gove the smart arse... I do believe him to be genuinely passionate about schools.Worthy4England wrote:
Just don't leave me with 5 years of having to listen to Michael Gove please.
Have you ever noticed how much he blinks, though?! It's so distracting once you have....
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I actually quite like Gove the smart arse... I do believe him to be genuinely passionate about schools.Worthy4England wrote:
Just don't leave me with 5 years of having to listen to Michael Gove please.
Have you ever noticed how much he blinks, though?! It's so distracting once you have....
'tis rumoured that education might go to the liberals though....
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
It's certainly been an hugely interesting day politically.
You couldn't really see a Lib/Lab pact coming off - Brown as a lame duck, would never have been able to carry it off - I actually doubt "him upstairs" could have got the Labour Party to join that coalition.
But a Con/Lib coalition - that's just a huge change from politics as I've ever known it (given that the Liberals are historically left of centre) - and it looks like there's significant concessions to the Libs. That said, they have a big majority between them, so assuming they can keep the coalition stuck together - they should have no problems getting any of their Bills through the HoC. I think it might be an interesting ride, so I'm going to hold tight.
You couldn't really see a Lib/Lab pact coming off - Brown as a lame duck, would never have been able to carry it off - I actually doubt "him upstairs" could have got the Labour Party to join that coalition.
But a Con/Lib coalition - that's just a huge change from politics as I've ever known it (given that the Liberals are historically left of centre) - and it looks like there's significant concessions to the Libs. That said, they have a big majority between them, so assuming they can keep the coalition stuck together - they should have no problems getting any of their Bills through the HoC. I think it might be an interesting ride, so I'm going to hold tight.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Somehow, that doesn't surprise me...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I actually quite like Gove the smart arse... I do believe him to be genuinely passionate about schools.Worthy4England wrote:
Just don't leave me with 5 years of having to listen to Michael Gove please.
Have you ever noticed how much he blinks, though?! It's so distracting once you have....

He's like a nearly grown up version of Tory Boy...
At the end of the day it'd become clear that the Conservative's offer was the only viable choice, politically and professionally.Worthy4England wrote:It's certainly been an hugely interesting day politically.
You couldn't really see a Lib/Lab pact coming off - Brown as a lame duck, would never have been able to carry it off - I actually doubt "him upstairs" could have got the Labour Party to join that coalition.
But a Con/Lib coalition - that's just a huge change from politics as I've ever known it (given that the Liberals are historically left of centre) - and it looks like there's significant concessions to the Libs. That said, they have a big majority between them, so assuming they can keep the coalition stuck together - they should have no problems getting any of their Bills through the HoC. I think it might be an interesting ride, so I'm going to hold tight.
I'm none too optomistic about the length of this upcoming Government. Though like all marriages I expect it to have its honeymoon period, because I'd think that they have (broadly) a similar view on what is to be done with the economy. I only feel that as time goes on, policy differences between the two will become a lot more noticeable...Europe should be interesting when that comes up. And tuition fees...etc
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Bill Cash had some very conciliatory words to say around compromise on Europe...Verbal wrote:At the end of the day it'd become clear that the Conservative's offer was the only viable choice, politically and professionally.Worthy4England wrote:It's certainly been an hugely interesting day politically.
You couldn't really see a Lib/Lab pact coming off - Brown as a lame duck, would never have been able to carry it off - I actually doubt "him upstairs" could have got the Labour Party to join that coalition.
But a Con/Lib coalition - that's just a huge change from politics as I've ever known it (given that the Liberals are historically left of centre) - and it looks like there's significant concessions to the Libs. That said, they have a big majority between them, so assuming they can keep the coalition stuck together - they should have no problems getting any of their Bills through the HoC. I think it might be an interesting ride, so I'm going to hold tight.
I'm none too optomistic about the length of this upcoming Government. Though like all marriages I expect it to have its honeymoon period, because I'd think that they have (broadly) a similar view on what is to be done with the economy. I only feel that as time goes on, policy differences between the two will become a lot more noticeable...Europe should be interesting when that comes up. And tuition fees...etc

As for it being the only move politically, the Lib Dems in a lot of areas are further left than Labour.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Assume he's just talking about the numbers.Worthy4England wrote:
As for it being the only move politically, the Lib Dems in a lot of areas are further left than Labour.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
The Liberals hardly had a choice if their public pronouncements that Labour were a set of wankers with no desire for partnership are to be believedWilliam the White wrote:My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
Sto ut Serviam
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
What have they turned away WtW? Had to switch off my news coverage...William the White wrote:My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
I think it's all a little strange - if I was Tory, I'd be looking to go back to the polls fairly soon to see if I could improve on what I had...
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
I'm not sure who thought Brown or anyone else would be able to get a vote through the Labour Party back-benchers.CAPSLOCK wrote:The Liberals hardly had a choice if their public pronouncements that Labour were a set of wankers with no desire for partnership are to be believedWilliam the White wrote:My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
Any how at least they're now in bed with people they've known are a set of wankers for 40 years or more.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Cameron's only 44!Worthy4England wrote:
Any how at least they're now in bed with people they've known are a set of wankers for 40 years or more.
(Was he, one wonders, a precocious wanker at the age of 4?

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Labour had made the offer clear - AV now and a referendum on full PR (my pref!).CAPSLOCK wrote:The Liberals hardly had a choice if their public pronouncements that Labour were a set of wankers with no desire for partnership are to be believedWilliam the White wrote:My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
Some labour has-beens start the grumble, stupid bastards, in alliance with scots who hate the SNP... and give Clegg the excuse to embrace his chosen new squeeze... Their statement is simply to justify a choice they will regret as it tears their party apart...
I'm looking forward to welcoming the decent people misled into an unprincipled alliance...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Did enjoy this from yesterday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gkHwU4DRA8
Adam Boulton shows himself to be a complete nice person, yet again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gkHwU4DRA8
Adam Boulton shows himself to be a complete nice person, yet again.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
The Parliamentary Labour Party (having already resigned themselves to a period in opposition) were never going to buy it - as I mentioned Monday night (said he smugly). Anyone seriously thinking different probably needs their bumps feeling.William the White wrote:Labour had made the offer clear - AV now and a referendum on full PR (my pref!).CAPSLOCK wrote:The Liberals hardly had a choice if their public pronouncements that Labour were a set of wankers with no desire for partnership are to be believedWilliam the White wrote:My guess is 18 months before a LibDem split, as Clegg is stuck very uncomfortably with a governing party very likely to be at war against its people, quite possibly with tear gas in the streets... and the liberal portion of his party deserts him...
The LibDems incredibly stupid to turn away from the best chance their party had to attain their policy of 60 + years... but got to give it to Cameron, he's obviously good at schmoozing and Clegg at swooning...
Some labour has-beens start the grumble, stupid bastards, in alliance with scots who hate the SNP... and give Clegg the excuse to embrace his chosen new squeeze... Their statement is simply to justify a choice they will regret as it tears their party apart...
I'm looking forward to welcoming the decent people misled into an unprincipled alliance...
It is entirely possible that Labour (Gordon - outgoing Leader) made the offer fairly independently of any understanding as to whether he could carry a party vote on it, as a negotiating tactic, to up the ante on the Tories and that there was never really any substance behind it - which seemed to be what the LibDems were saying after the meeting this morning.
Whilst being particularly funny, a Lib/Lab coalition would have been viewed at least as "not fair play" by most of the electorate (IMO) and at worst hugely divisive - which could have led to a lifetime on the oppo benches - especially given the current financial position isn't likely to improve in the time it would have taken for the two sides to break off the engagement.
It's certainly got to be even funnier to see Libs and Cons in bed together - I think they're genuinely going to try and work it - but they're ideologically way further apart than Lib/Lab.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
You and I both know, Mummy, that at the age of 4 he wouldn't have been doing his own wanking. He would have had his own nanny (probably not paid the national minimum wage) to do it for him.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Cameron's only 44!Worthy4England wrote:
Any how at least they're now in bed with people they've known are a set of wankers for 40 years or more.
(Was he, one wonders, a precocious wanker at the age of 4?)

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests