The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck* of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
My decision is not to live in denial... Is yours to put your fingers in your ears and go nah, nah, nah???Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
(now - unlike most of you, it seems, I don't believe there is such a thing/place as hell... but, going with that...)
It is the most "most pathetic, childish line" Bruce has "ever read anywhere" when it is suggested that Cameron, Osborne and the Tories should be consigned to hell...
yet - it is entirely laudable (and presumably not a "pathetic, childish line") to blanket-label all politicians as "c*nts" and suggest they should be consigned to hell..
have I got that right? It seems a little inconsistent to me.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
I agree that politicians are in the main self-serving. I haven't mentioned sending anyone to hell. Where's this inconsistency that you're on about?thebish wrote:Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
(now - unlike most of you, it seems, I don't believe there is such a thing/place as hell... but, going with that...)
It is the most "most pathetic, childish line" Bruce has "ever read anywhere" when it is suggested that Cameron, Osborne and the Tories should be consigned to hell...
yet - it is entirely laudable (and presumably not a "pathetic, childish line") to blanket-label all politicians as "c*nts" and suggest they should be consigned to hell..
have I got that right? It seems a little inconsistent to me.
May the bridges I burn light your way
indeed you did Bruce. you agreed entirely with LK's idea - the idea that EVERY politician should be put on the list - and the list was the list of politicians being consigned to hell.Bruce Rioja wrote:I agree that politicians are in the main self-serving. I haven't mentioned sending anyone to hell. Where's this inconsistency that you're on about?thebish wrote:Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
(now - unlike most of you, it seems, I don't believe there is such a thing/place as hell... but, going with that...)
It is the most "most pathetic, childish line" Bruce has "ever read anywhere" when it is suggested that Cameron, Osborne and the Tories should be consigned to hell...
yet - it is entirely laudable (and presumably not a "pathetic, childish line") to blanket-label all politicians as "c*nts" and suggest they should be consigned to hell..
have I got that right? It seems a little inconsistent to me.
so.
first you said it was "pathetic and childish" to consign Cameron, Osborne and the Tories to hell
then you agreed "entirely" with LK that EVERY politician (ie. including Cameron, Osborne and the Tories) should be on the list of those being consigned to hell.
there's the inconsistency.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
I still agree with LK if it helps the argument any.thebish wrote:indeed you did Bruce. you agreed entirely with LK's idea - the idea that EVERY politician should be put on the list - and the list was the list of politicians being consigned to hell.Bruce Rioja wrote:I agree that politicians are in the main self-serving. I haven't mentioned sending anyone to hell. Where's this inconsistency that you're on about?thebish wrote:Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
(now - unlike most of you, it seems, I don't believe there is such a thing/place as hell... but, going with that...)
It is the most "most pathetic, childish line" Bruce has "ever read anywhere" when it is suggested that Cameron, Osborne and the Tories should be consigned to hell...
yet - it is entirely laudable (and presumably not a "pathetic, childish line") to blanket-label all politicians as "c*nts" and suggest they should be consigned to hell..
have I got that right? It seems a little inconsistent to me.
so.
first you said it was "pathetic and childish" to consign Cameron, Osborne and the Tories to hell
then you agreed "entirely" with LK that EVERY politician (ie. including Cameron, Osborne and the Tories) should be on the list of those being consigned to hell.
there's the inconsistency.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38879
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
I particularly liked the way that after his "speech" Osborne sat down with a big grin and was patted on the back by Cameron also sporting a big grin.
Cos when you're ripping up hundreds of thousands of jobs, destroying peoples lives and the like even if you feel you HAVE to do it, smiling and jocular pats on the back for the bloke delivering the message are really going to help people feel better.
This really is their wet dream. Bet they have sticky sheets every night.
Cos when you're ripping up hundreds of thousands of jobs, destroying peoples lives and the like even if you feel you HAVE to do it, smiling and jocular pats on the back for the bloke delivering the message are really going to help people feel better.
This really is their wet dream. Bet they have sticky sheets every night.
Anyway - here's something from one of those whining lefties...
I agree with Osborne and Cameron and Co. - well done for ring-fencing overseas aid. It seems overseas aid will increase by MORE than our defence budget is cut.
well done Tories - and well done all you Tory-boy supporters on here - your guys did get summat right - and I offer credit where credit is due.
I agree with Osborne and Cameron and Co. - well done for ring-fencing overseas aid. It seems overseas aid will increase by MORE than our defence budget is cut.
well done Tories - and well done all you Tory-boy supporters on here - your guys did get summat right - and I offer credit where credit is due.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Have you nothing worthwhile to do?thebish wrote:indeed you did Bruce. you agreed entirely with LK's idea - the idea that EVERY politician should be put on the list - and the list was the list of politicians being consigned to hell.Bruce Rioja wrote:I agree that politicians are in the main self-serving. I haven't mentioned sending anyone to hell. Where's this inconsistency that you're on about?thebish wrote:Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
(now - unlike most of you, it seems, I don't believe there is such a thing/place as hell... but, going with that...)
It is the most "most pathetic, childish line" Bruce has "ever read anywhere" when it is suggested that Cameron, Osborne and the Tories should be consigned to hell...
yet - it is entirely laudable (and presumably not a "pathetic, childish line") to blanket-label all politicians as "c*nts" and suggest they should be consigned to hell..
have I got that right? It seems a little inconsistent to me.
so.
first you said it was "pathetic and childish" to consign Cameron, Osborne and the Tories to hell
then you agreed "entirely" with LK that EVERY politician (ie. including Cameron, Osborne and the Tories) should be on the list of those being consigned to hell.
there's the inconsistency.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
No, silly question.William the White wrote:My decision is not to live in denial... Is yours to put your fingers in your ears and go nah, nah, nah???Bruce Rioja wrote:Actually, I agree entirely with that. It's just that there's this gushing forth from some lefties on here that clearly live in complete denial, and that are making absolute feck of themselves. Hey-ho, it's their decision.Lord Kangana wrote:You can put every politician who ever lived on the list for me.
I'm f*cked if I'm going to defend selfish self serving c*nts and pretend they're in it for anyone but themselves.
Just saying.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Which is great.. But what about the masses of people who will lose their jobs because of all these cuts. Wo will then not be able to do things like.. You know, pay their heating bills etc. Hence bringing them into "The most vulnerable" category aswell as the shite benefits that will be on offer despite many, many people putting money into the governments coffers for many, many years.thebish wrote:"we have protected the most vulnerable, saved cold weather payments from planned Labour cuts and ensured there will be no impact on child poverty.
Forcing lots of people out of work doesn't end a recession. It starts a new one
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38879
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Ah but you see you've missed two incredibly important points....boltonboris wrote:Which is great.. But what about the masses of people who will lose their jobs because of all these cuts. Wo will then not be able to do things like.. You know, pay their heating bills etc. Hence bringing them into "The most vulnerable" category aswell as the shite benefits that will be on offer despite many, many people putting money into the governments coffers for many, many years.thebish wrote:"we have protected the most vulnerable, saved cold weather payments from planned Labour cuts and ensured there will be no impact on child poverty.
Forcing lots of people out of work doesn't end a recession. It starts a new one
1) The private sector will ride like a knight mounted on a white stallion through the night to make up for the jobs shortfall even though it is predicted to suffer just as heavily as the public sector.
2) Cameron et al don't care.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests