david wheater

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:33 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Ironically Boro are looking to Abdoulaye Meite as a replacement.

Thats a name that should go in the "not with a barge pole" threat methinks!

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am

Sorry Bish!

Anyways the more I think about this deal the more I think it could be an excellent one for us.

Wheater seems a proper kind of bloke, from what I've seen of him he likes to go in where it hurts. He's 23, cost just over 3M so I'm told and has already had some England recognition. He sounds like he's found his form again this season, form that initially prompted big bids for him as a 19/20 year old from Spurs I believe. He's had some troubles but hopefully he'll continue his resurgence with us.

Similar to when we got Cahill I think but Wheater has the added bonus of bags of experience. Not as good a footballer but hopefully will be really solid, which is what we need.

Oh and he's proper ugly. A good quality to have in a defender I think.

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:10 am

£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.

ITK, TNK etc

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:15 am

Lofthouse Lower wrote:£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.

ITK, TNK etc

Fair do's. Northern echo journo's reckon its around about the 3M mark in total and they are normall pretty accurate with what they say as they have a close relationship to clubs up there.

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 pm

Maybe that's some sort of currency conversion based on the fact that they still trade in coal up in the NE

Bijou Bob · Post by **Bijou Bob** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:25 pm

One deal done.

Next!!

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:46 pm

FWIW Nixon just posted on the BRFCS board that the fee for Wheater is considerably less than the 2.3M + 1.5M add ons reported, which does not surprise me at all.

Verbal · Post by **Verbal** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:56 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Sorry Bish!

Anyways the more I think about this deal the more I think it could be an excellent one for us.

Wheater seems a proper kind of bloke, from what I've seen of him he likes to go in where it hurts. He's 23, cost just over 3M so I'm told and has already had some England recognition. He sounds like he's found his form again this season, form that initially prompted big bids for him as a 19/20 year old from Spurs I believe. He's had some troubles but hopefully he'll continue his resurgence with us.

Similar to when we got Cahill I think but Wheater has the added bonus of bags of experience. Not as good a footballer but hopefully will be really solid, which is what we need.

Oh and he's proper ugly. A good quality to have in a defender I think.

Quite. When we first got Cahill I thought he looked like one of those Easter Island heads.

TANGODANCER · Post by **TANGODANCER** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:58 pm

Whatever the cost if we shore our defence back up to Fortress Reebok it'll be worth it.

thebish · Post by **thebish** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:11 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:FWIW Nixon just posted on the BRFCS board that the fee for Wheater is considerably less than the 2.3M + 1.5M add ons reported, which does not surprise me at all.

well - that can't be true because Lofthouse Lower assures me it is as follows...

Lofthouse Lower wrote:£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.
ITK, TNK etc

seanworth · Post by **seanworth** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:12 pm

Done and sorted. Let's hope he gets him form back and it will be a good bit of business in a position that needed sorting.

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:13 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:FWIW Nixon just posted on the BRFCS board that the fee for Wheater is considerably less than the 2.3M + 1.5M add ons reported, which does not surprise me at all.
well - that can't be true because Lofthouse Lower assures me it is as follows...

Lofthouse Lower wrote:£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.
ITK, TNK etc

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:19 pm

That's because he cost 50p and a curly wurly

Lofthouse Lower · Post by **Lofthouse Lower** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:54 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:FWIW Nixon just posted on the BRFCS board that the fee for Wheater is considerably less than the 2.3M + 1.5M add ons reported, which does not surprise me at all.
well - that can't be true because Lofthouse Lower assures me it is as follows...

Lofthouse Lower wrote:£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.
ITK, TNK etc

I know Nixon is akin to God for you, Mr Insane, but I've had my inside scoop from within the club, so what can you do?

BWFC_Insane · Post by **BWFC_Insane** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:01 pm

Lofthouse Lower wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:FWIW Nixon just posted on the BRFCS board that the fee for Wheater is considerably less than the 2.3M + 1.5M add ons reported, which does not surprise me at all.
well - that can't be true because Lofthouse Lower assures me it is as follows...

Lofthouse Lower wrote:£2.3m with £1.5m on appearances.
ITK, TNK etc

I know Nixon is akin to God for you, Mr Insane, but I've had my inside scoop from within the club, so what can you do?

I don't know, I have a few suggestions.

Nixon broke every "twist" in the Wheater story days before anyone else. I only posted it for info, people mock but its a source of info. People will believe what they want.

ohjimmyjimmy · Post by **ohjimmyjimmy** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:30 pm

A proper PSG

hisroyalgingerness · Post by **hisroyalgingerness** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:13 pm

Pitch
Shirt
Gurn

RobbieSavagesLeg · Post by **RobbieSavagesLeg** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:36 pm

Proper stoked with this one.
We need to stop letting goals in!

bettyrasta · Post by **bettyrasta** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:59 pm

More of a Car park, Shirt and Enigmatic smile I believe.

TKIZ! · Post by **TKIZ!** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:26 pm

Wheater's a real beaut!

david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Re: david wheater

Who is online

Connect with your social network account

Who is online