The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
Aye, and pretty sure Riley didn't ref us again after the Blackburn game where Allardyce accused him of nearly starting a riot, and threatened to send a dossier on how shit he was to the FA. I still can't get over the Jenas one, and couldn't believe it when MotD didn't bother. Now if we were being all Arsenal fan t*atty we'd be calling for a lifetime ban and a jail sentence for Jenas, instead I just wish the referee had done his job and sent him. 1-1 against ten men. That's before the stonewall penalty. I don't think it's a conscious decision perhaps, but there are absolutely no doubts in my mind that if Cahill had been wearing a Spurs shirt he'd have given a penalty. That said, Spurs fans don't need telling how shit he is.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote: The difference between these complaints that we do have, and the stuff Wenger complains about, is that the things we've complained about aren't open to interpretation - they happened, and the evidence is there for all to see. Wenger's are so open to interpretation that we might as well be discussing the existence of God at the same time.
hmmmmm.... now that DOES sound Wengeresque!
some on here have said neither of the spurs penalties should have been given - others have said they were fair enough - so - interpretation...
I just think it always sounds wankerish to claim after a game you lost that somehow it was down to a conspiracy - shite reffing - fair enough - but a conspiracy??
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
We lost because they scored more than we did..thebish wrote:KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab wrote: The difference between these complaints that we do have, and the stuff Wenger complains about, is that the things we've complained about aren't open to interpretation - they happened, and the evidence is there for all to see. Wenger's are so open to interpretation that we might as well be discussing the existence of God at the same time.
hmmmmm.... now that DOES sound Wengeresque!
some on here have said neither of the spurs penalties should have been given - others have said they were fair enough - so - interpretation...
I just think it always sounds wankerish to claim after a game you lost that somehow it was down to a conspiracy - shite reffing - fair enough - but a conspiracy??
Even if the decisions went for us we may still have lost..
Clattenburg was poor and made a number of questionable decisions , too many for comfort
Not sure he's anti Bolton -- but he's in the same mould as POLL -- look at me - I'm important - -
No you aren't you're just crap.. be better and more anonymous or feck off to the conference..
Difference is POLL was better, most of the time..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
Now there's an idea.......what does it take for this to happen?bw@bw wrote:
IIRC Greater Manchester Police got Knight taken off the mtch because "they could not guarantee his safety"
Are we talking, in a true 'The Sun' style, discover his address, print it, and get some threats sent? OR just us lot making noise....next time he's at the Reebok, I'm sending Lofthouse Lower and the army of chavs from charlie corner onto the pitch to tw@t seve shades of shit out of him in the warm up?
Anyways, the blokes got a clear bias here......if it was a bigger, or noisier team, he wouldn't be near us again.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
Either way, he's still a total shithouse.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:41 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
He actually tried to give a third penalty but the linesman said it was offsidehisroyalgingerness wrote:The guy is unbelievable. The bias against this club is plain to see, we've seen some shocking decisions down the years:
What did I miss?
- Booking Davies for diving
The disallowed Fulham goal
Two pens today, both were questionable
Booking Cahill for diving today
The free kick given when the guy kicked his own heel, today
Add to that the contact ignoring of fouls on Kev. Guys a disgrace, and Coyle should risk a fine by saying so
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: The Clattenberg Hall of Shame
Don't put me in with that lot. They're the scum of the Earth.officer_dibble wrote:Now there's an idea.......what does it take for this to happen?bw@bw wrote:
IIRC Greater Manchester Police got Knight taken off the mtch because "they could not guarantee his safety"
Are we talking, in a true 'The Sun' style, discover his address, print it, and get some threats sent? OR just us lot making noise....next time he's at the Reebok, I'm sending Lofthouse Lower and the army of chavs from charlie corner onto the pitch to tw@t seve shades of shit out of him in the warm up?
Anyways, the blokes got a clear bias here......if it was a bigger, or noisier team, he wouldn't be near us again.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests