TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Your argument doesn't stand up to even the most basic of scrutiny.
We were offered cashmoney for a player. We took it. He can say what he likes in the press, just like when we were told that the Anelka money was additional. He was a saleable asset. We sold him to the first offer. See also Gudjohnson, E.
We were offered cashmoney for a player. We took it. He can say what he likes in the press, just like when we were told that the Anelka money was additional. He was a saleable asset. We sold him to the first offer. See also Gudjohnson, E.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
He'd still be called 'Jay' though !!Prufrock wrote:He doesn't have to be good enough for England to improve us. I saw him earlier in his career and I've seen for for Cardiff and he is a much better player now, his attitude is better and he makes more of an impact. He isn't Anelka, but if we have no money we could do a LOT worse.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I don't doubt what you are saying but it is a pity that he hasn't been given an opportunity to prove his self at the top level.malcd1 wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:If Ward was ever likely to make it at our level, we'd not be selling him.
As I've said all along he's had the chances on loan to develop and whilst he's looked a solid league one player he's not stood out enough. No point keeping the lad and holding his career back.
Huddersfield just sold Pilkington to Norwich, so Ward will be his replacement so it makes sense.
Big few weeks coming up for Coyle now that IMO will define his time here.
What do you think Ward is worth? Didn't we buy him for £1m so we would want at least that. Maybe up to £2m?[/quote]
Its said a 6 figure fee. That could be anything from £100,000 to £999,000. I'd guess mid section of those figures. £500,000, seems a reasonable deal to me.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Yes this is exactly the same as selling Gudjohnsen. Exactly.Lord Kangana wrote:Your argument doesn't stand up to even the most basic of scrutiny.
We were offered cashmoney for a player. We took it. He can say what he likes in the press, just like when we were told that the Anelka money was additional. He was a saleable asset. We sold him to the first offer. See also Gudjohnson, E.
This summer is no different to any other. Nobody is suggesting we're going on a spending spree. But Eddie Davies hasn't suddenly decided he's no longer interested in supporting the club.
I love the fact we haven't brought more than Pratley in yet is cos we have "no money" as opposed to a generally slow transfer market, overinflated prices and the difficulty of trying to persuade players to join us ahead of all our competitors.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
That could, of course, yet be £1,000.00Turkish Trotter wrote:It said a 6 figure fee. That could be anything from £100,000 to £999,000. I'd guess mid section of those figures. £500,000, seems a reasonable deal to me.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
bobo the clown wrote:He'd still be called 'Jay' though !!Prufrock wrote:He doesn't have to be good enough for England to improve us. I saw him earlier in his career and I've seen for for Cardiff and he is a much better player now, his attitude is better and he makes more of an impact. He isn't Anelka, but if we have no money we could do a LOT worse.
That is a good point well made.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Is he cheap?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes this is exactly the same as selling Gudjohnsen. Exactly.Lord Kangana wrote:Your argument doesn't stand up to even the most basic of scrutiny.
We were offered cashmoney for a player. We took it. He can say what he likes in the press, just like when we were told that the Anelka money was additional. He was a saleable asset. We sold him to the first offer. See also Gudjohnson, E.
This summer is no different to any other. Nobody is suggesting we're going on a spending spree. But Eddie Davies hasn't suddenly decided he's no longer interested in supporting the club.
I love the fact we haven't brought more than Pratley in yet is cos we have "no money" as opposed to a generally slow transfer market, overinflated prices and the difficulty of trying to persuade players to join us ahead of all our competitors.
If we've got no money Coyle could well have been told he has to sell to buy. In that case unless Ward was looking like being able to contribue this season then short term pennies outranks the risk on a young player whose potential we don't know. Especially given it doesn't look like there are too many keen on our valuation of Cahill.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Lord Kangana wrote:Is he cheap?
So cheap he could curry favour with Bobo by changing his name to the very solid 'Maureen'.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I like him already.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I get what you are saying Pru but I don't believe the couple of hundred thousand we are getting up front would be incentive enough to sell a player like Ward if we have no money whatsoever. If as LK suggests we don't even have the money to bring in the Bosmans Coyle claims he has dismissed then 200 thousand for Ward won't change owt and will leave the squad a player light with no chance to bring anyone else in. Sorry just don't buy it!
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:39 am
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Wardy would be a great signing for us for 6 figures
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
200k?BWFC_Insane wrote:I get what you are saying Pru but I don't believe the couple of hundred thousand we are getting up front would be incentive enough to sell a player like Ward if we have no money whatsoever. If as LK suggests we don't even have the money to bring in the Bosmans Coyle claims he has dismissed then 200 thousand for Ward won't change owt and will leave the squad a player light with no chance to bring anyone else in. Sorry just don't buy it!
Is that ITK?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Ward = fat boy who likes partying too much
ta ra
ta ra
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Heard a rumour out of a Sunderland fan that we've had a bid for Michael Turner turned down
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Supposed to be interested in some guy called Tobias Levels from Borussia Munching Glass Back (or somethig similar) - according to the Gernan version of goal.com. As with most our supposed targets I've never 'erd of 'im.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Since i'm from Germany i know him very well. The reason for his departure is mostly the appointment of Lucien Favre back in February, but to be honest he wasn't the sharpest in the last year. He's a right back and is able to play Centre Back and CM/DM.
I don't really see that coming, we don't really need another RB and he would only be 4th choice behind the three CB's oder the three CM's.
btw: it's Borussia Mönchengladbach, you really should know this team back from the 70s.
I don't really see that coming, we don't really need another RB and he would only be 4th choice behind the three CB's oder the three CM's.
btw: it's Borussia Mönchengladbach, you really should know this team back from the 70s.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Watch him against Liverpool a while back, looks ok at going forward but would fit in well with our other defenders at actually defending! Rash at tackling, always going to ground for a tackle.Bruno3 wrote:Supposed to be interested in some guy called Tobias Levels from Borussia Munching Glass Back (or somethig similar) - according to the Gernan version of goal.com. As with most our supposed targets I've never 'erd of 'im.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I'd say a player who can play RB/CB could well be on the list.dezi wrote:Since i'm from Germany i know him very well. The reason for his departure is mostly the appointment of Lucien Favre back in February, but to be honest he wasn't the sharpest in the last year. He's a right back and is able to play Centre Back and CM/DM.
I don't really see that coming, we don't really need another RB and he would only be 4th choice behind the three CB's oder the three CM's.
btw: it's Borussia Mönchengladbach, you really should know this team back from the 70s.
Whether this guy is any good who knows?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
dezi wrote: btw: it's Borussia Mönchengladbach, you really should know this team back from the 70s.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 22 guests