Megson Watch

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:18 pm

Get a load of this!!

Goodness gracious me :roll:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 88942.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:45 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Get a load of this!!

Goodness gracious me :roll:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 88942.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm not sure he says anything there that hasn't been said before?

Comes across as a bit arrogant. That though is probably a pre-requisite for a manager. I don't think the football he plays is the problem, I think he struggles to manage relationships with players over longer periods, especially when things go wrong for periods of time.

If he gets Wednesday up though, he's done a cracking job....

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Megson Watch

Post by CrazyHorse » Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:49 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Get a load of this!!

Goodness gracious me :roll:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 88942.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm not sure he says anything there that hasn't been said before?

Comes across as a bit arrogant. That though is probably a pre-requisite for a manager. I don't think the football he plays is the problem, I think he struggles to manage relationships with players over longer periods, especially when things go wrong for periods of time.

If he gets Wednesday up though, he's done a cracking job....
He's a wanker.

He'll get Wednesday up.
It'll go pear shaped.
He'll be sacked.
It'll all be the fans fault.
Businesswoman of the year.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:04 pm

Brilliant job with the highest wage budget in the division at the biggest club.

And he's not a wanker Crazy, he's a massive c*nt.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Brilliant job with the highest wage budget in the division at the biggest club.

And he's not a wanker Crazy, he's a massive c*nt.
That was the case before he turned up though. And they were near the bottom....

He may be a c*nt but thats irrelevant if he does a decent job.

Did what he was asked here until his final season...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:18 pm

With (drum role please) a big budget.

Man's a fraud.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:21 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:With (drum role please) a big budget.

Man's a fraud.
Nope, just an average football manager who will have a mixed career before retiring.

Give any manager 30M in the premiership to replace an entire team, It's not a big budget and most would take that team down..

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:23 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think the football he plays is the problem
Deary fecking me :lol:

Go on, piss off with yer.....

:lol:

Enough's enough!
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:43 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think the football he plays is the problem
Deary fecking me :lol:

Go on, piss off with yer.....

:lol:

Enough's enough!
We played some good stuff under him. See Spurs and City games at home as examples. Some football was very good.

Some of it was tosh.

I don't think we've seen anything significantly better football wise since. I'm not alone in that opinion either.

But taking all that opinion away, it was certainly no worse than the football Allardyce played. Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:58 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think the football he plays is the problem
Deary fecking me :lol:

Go on, piss off with yer.....

:lol:

Enough's enough!
We played some good stuff under him. See Spurs and City games at home as examples. Some football was very good.

Some of it was tosh.

I don't think we've seen anything significantly better football wise since. I'm not alone in that opinion either.

But taking all that opinion away, it was certainly no worse than the football Allardyce played. Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.
Nixon agrees does he? :roll:

You're welcome to opinion, Chief, as we all are, but do please stop putting yours across like it's the authorised version of events, it's very annoying.

Just saying like. ;)

And your last sentence there completely contradicts itself.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:16 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think the football he plays is the problem
Deary fecking me :lol:

Go on, piss off with yer.....

:lol:

Enough's enough!
We played some good stuff under him. See Spurs and City games at home as examples. Some football was very good.

Some of it was tosh.

I don't think we've seen anything significantly better football wise since. I'm not alone in that opinion either.

But taking all that opinion away, it was certainly no worse than the football Allardyce played. Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.
Nixon agrees does he? :roll:

You're welcome to opinion, Chief, as we all are, but do please stop putting yours across like it's the authorised version of events, it's very annoying.

Just saying like. ;)

And your last sentence there completely contradicts itself.
Ermm have I done that?

Surely that "I think/don't think" reflects it as an opinion....

Perhaps my opinion on Megson on this site is not welcome. I get that. Folk think I liked him, which isn't true. I just saw him as a very very average football manager doing his best at a struggling premiership side who would not be there for that long in the ever revolving door of management......

Good luck to him, he's not someone I could get remotely close to hating, or loving or even liking. I was ambivalent towards him, which perhaps was his biggest problem with the fans, not enough character for grudging admiration and not enough skill for adulation...who knows....

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Megson Watch

Post by thebish » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:24 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Good luck to him, he's not someone I could get remotely close to hating, or loving or even liking. I was ambivalent towards him, which perhaps was his biggest problem with the fans, not enough character for grudging admiration and not enough skill for adulation...who knows....

I think some of the confusion comes from you wishing Megson all the best and then proclaiming that you hope Coyle's reputation is so damaged that he becomes a football pariah and never works in football again...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:37 pm

thebish wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Good luck to him, he's not someone I could get remotely close to hating, or loving or even liking. I was ambivalent towards him, which perhaps was his biggest problem with the fans, not enough character for grudging admiration and not enough skill for adulation...who knows....

I think some of the confusion comes from you wishing Megson all the best and then proclaiming that you hope Coyle's reputation is so damaged that he becomes a football pariah and never works in football again...
I guess its that Megson is always going to be regarded as average...

Coyle despite his failings with us this season still gets support in the media, from fans etc...and is still to an extent the golden boy.

Megson had all the hate he needed elsewhere...

Coyle has all the sychophantic "he's a nice guy" media support excuse laden love-in he needs elsewhere.

Just trying to balance things up a bit.... :wink:

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:52 pm

Megson had all the money and had us 19th. Coyle didn't, and has us 19th. Please attempt some consistency.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:07 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:I don't think the football he plays is the problem
Deary fecking me :lol:

Go on, piss off with yer.....

:lol:

Enough's enough!
We played some good stuff under him. See Spurs and City games at home as examples. Some football was very good.

Some of it was tosh.

I don't think we've seen anything significantly better football wise since. I'm not alone in that opinion either.

But taking all that opinion away, it was certainly no worse than the football Allardyce played. Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.
Nixon agrees does he? :roll:

You're welcome to opinion, Chief, as we all are, but do please stop putting yours across like it's the authorised version of events, it's very annoying.

Just saying like. ;)

And your last sentence there completely contradicts itself.
Ermm have I done that?

Surely that "I think/don't think" reflects it as an opinion....

Perhaps my opinion on Megson on this site is not welcome. I get that. Folk think I liked him, which isn't true. I just saw him as a very very average football manager doing his best at a struggling premiership side who would not be there for that long in the ever revolving door of management......

Good luck to him, he's not someone I could get remotely close to hating, or loving or even liking. I was ambivalent towards him, which perhaps was his biggest problem with the fans, not enough character for grudging admiration and not enough skill for adulation...who knows....
Just so you know, in my opinion the football was that bad under Megson (5 across midfield at home to a Sunderland, Blackburn et al, anyone?) that I stopped going. After 35 years and all four divisions I actually couldn't take any more. THAT bad.

Now, explain this if you'd be so good - Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.
So your saying that if a side's bottom of the league then they play shit football, but you also say that it was no better under Allardyce. Errr, didn't we qualify for Europe twice under Allardyce?

What's it to be then? You can't have it both ways.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:18 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:Megson had all the money and had us 19th. Coyle didn't, and has us 19th. Please attempt some consistency.
Thats a one-eyed view though IMHO.

Megson bought an entire team with 30M.

Coyle with about half has brought, half a team or less....

As I say give most managers £30M and say that over 3 seasons they will replace virtually an entire squad give or take, in the premiership, and they'll struggle.

Coyle has had somethings going for him that Megson did not and vica versa...

Megson had the Lee mess to deal with a host of absolutely pish signings to move out with, losing his best player after a few months, fans against him, a complete squad re-haul...

Coyle has admittedly had less money to shape the team in his image, but retained a more solid core to the squad, has been asked to lower the age of the team, inherited a squad low on confidence and some players who were not up to what he wanted to do...

TBH in my opinion if you rolled Megson's pragmatism and toughness into Coyle's enthusiasm and drive you'd probably have an excellent premiership manager!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:22 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote: Just so you know, in my opinion the football was that bad under Megson (5 across midfield at home to a Sunderland, Blackburn et al, anyone?) that I stopped going. After 35 years and all four divisions I actually couldn't take any more. THAT bad.

Now, explain this if you'd be so good - Results will always determine the football that can be played anyhow, as we're seeing this season.
So your saying that if a side's bottom of the league then they play shit football, but you also say that it was no better under Allardyce. Errr, didn't we qualify for Europe twice under Allardyce?

What's it to be then? You can't have it both ways.
Bruce all's I meant was that if you're fighting relegation you tend not to have the confidence to play exciting free-flowing football, nor the ability...IMO the football we've seen at times this season has been as directionless and insipid as I can remember....but I think its the situation rather than the intent....

Given the results he had Allardyce was best placed of any manager we've had to introduce "more variety" but he didn't seem that way inclined...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:26 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Megson had all the money and had us 19th. Coyle didn't, and has us 19th. Please attempt some consistency.
Thats a one-eyed view though IMHO.

Megson bought an entire team with 30M.

Coyle with about half has brought, half a team or less....

As I say give most managers £30M and say that over 3 seasons they will replace virtually an entire squad give or take, in the premiership, and they'll struggle.

Coyle has had somethings going for him that Megson did not and vica versa...

Megson had the Lee mess to deal with a host of absolutely pish signings to move out with, losing his best player after a few months, fans against him, a complete squad re-haul...

Coyle has admittedly had less money to shape the team in his image, but retained a more solid core to the squad, has been asked to lower the age of the team, inherited a squad low on confidence and some players who were not up to what he wanted to do...

TBH in my opinion if you rolled Megson's pragmatism and toughness into Coyle's enthusiasm and drive you'd probably have an excellent premiership manager!
We were 20th when he arrived. 19th when he left. As I say, for the money spent, I'd just like to see some consistency in your argument.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Megson Watch

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:33 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Megson had all the money and had us 19th. Coyle didn't, and has us 19th. Please attempt some consistency.
Thats a one-eyed view though IMHO.

Megson bought an entire team with 30M.

Coyle with about half has brought, half a team or less....

As I say give most managers £30M and say that over 3 seasons they will replace virtually an entire squad give or take, in the premiership, and they'll struggle.

Coyle has had somethings going for him that Megson did not and vica versa...

Megson had the Lee mess to deal with a host of absolutely pish signings to move out with, losing his best player after a few months, fans against him, a complete squad re-haul...

Coyle has admittedly had less money to shape the team in his image, but retained a more solid core to the squad, has been asked to lower the age of the team, inherited a squad low on confidence and some players who were not up to what he wanted to do...

TBH in my opinion if you rolled Megson's pragmatism and toughness into Coyle's enthusiasm and drive you'd probably have an excellent premiership manager!
We were 20th when he arrived. 19th when he left. As I say, for the money spent, I'd just like to see some consistency in your argument.
As would I for yours...but hey ho...

I just think blindly stating how much the two spent without the context behind it, is fruitless.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Megson Watch

Post by Lord Kangana » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:36 pm

Whats the context though? We were 19th when Coyle arrived, how is that significantly better than the mess Megson took over? Its just nonsense to state they were better players, theres not a shred of evidence in how the team was performing to support that claim. In the meantime he spent more money than any manager of this club has ever had. I fail to see my own inconsistency in demanding more from a manager with a wealth of resources failing to produce substantially better results than those without.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest