The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
So... the Scream is exhibited for 7 days in London this week: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bb481ea-84ae ... z1ruT1kJ2Y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think I might try and go for a quick look.
It's difficult to describe why the image is so striking and evocative(although there have been some good attempts on this page!). There is something about it that clearly resonates with a lot of people as there can't be many more famous paintings from the past 150 years.
I think I might try and go for a quick look.
It's difficult to describe why the image is so striking and evocative(although there have been some good attempts on this page!). There is something about it that clearly resonates with a lot of people as there can't be many more famous paintings from the past 150 years.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... the Scream is exhibited for 7 days in London this week: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bb481ea-84ae ... z1ruT1kJ2Y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think I might try and go for a quick look.
It's difficult to describe why the image is so striking and evocative(although there have been some good attempts on this page!). There is something about it that clearly resonates with a lot of people as there can't be many more famous paintings from the past 150 years.
you have to register for that link... where?? when??
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Sotheby's in Mayfair.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So... the Scream is exhibited for 7 days in London this week: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bb481ea-84ae ... z1ruT1kJ2Y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think I might try and go for a quick look.
It's difficult to describe why the image is so striking and evocative(although there have been some good attempts on this page!). There is something about it that clearly resonates with a lot of people as there can't be many more famous paintings from the past 150 years.
you have to register for that link... where?? when??
Actually it's just today and the weekend.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/ ... sfeed=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Looks to be a great sale - I hope all the main pieces will be in London before they go to NY.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
Philip Hook, senior specialist at the auction house, said: "In terms of the fame and the familiarity of the image, I think this is the most important picture that Sotheby's have ever sold. Short of selling the Mona Lisa, I do not think there is another image that transcends its original function as a work of art in a way that The Scream does.
"It is the ultimate image of angst and anxiety. It's an image of modern man's alienation – the face that launched a thousand therapists. In a sense it is the whole beginning of modern man's fascination with his own emotions."
good claims for "great art"....
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
It'll go for more than that. £85m I reckon.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!

May the bridges I burn light your way
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Considering Munch painted four versions, the first and last 17 years apart, he must have been one miseable sod, superceded only by the silly fxcker who'll pay multi- millions to own it. Dear me."It is the ultimate image of angst and anxiety. It's an image of modern man's alienation – the face that launched a thousand therapists. "

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Does that alter the fact that it remains the ultimate image of angst and anxiety? I think not.TANGODANCER wrote:Considering Munch painted four versions, the first and last 17 years apart, he must have been one miseable sod, superceded only by the silly fxcker who'll pay multi- millions to own it. Dear me."It is the ultimate image of angst and anxiety. It's an image of modern man's alienation – the face that launched a thousand therapists. "
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: The Great Art Debate
nope. it just reinforces the idea that Tango appears to regard people who don't happen to agree with his own "just my opinion" view and worth of art are "silly fxckers", even if he doesn't yet know who they are!!Bruce Rioja wrote:Does that alter the fact that it remains the ultimate image of angst and anxiety? I think not.TANGODANCER wrote:Considering Munch painted four versions, the first and last 17 years apart, he must have been one miseable sod, superceded only by the silly fxcker who'll pay multi- millions to own it. Dear me."It is the ultimate image of angst and anxiety. It's an image of modern man's alienation – the face that launched a thousand therapists. "
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I actually don't think so.Bruce Rioja wrote:It'll go for more than that. £85m I reckon.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!
One of the painted versions might fetch that, but this is only pastel.
None of the big galleries are spending that kind of cash at the moment, but it could be interesting if some oil money gets thrown at it with a couple of determined bidders.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Well, let's see.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I actually don't think so.Bruce Rioja wrote:It'll go for more than that. £85m I reckon.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!
One of the painted versions might fetch that, but this is only pastel.
None of the big galleries are spending that kind of cash at the moment, but it could be interesting if some oil money gets thrown at it with a couple of determined bidders.

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: The Great Art Debate
and no shill-bidding, bruce, to prove mummy wrong!Bruce Rioja wrote:Well, let's see.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I actually don't think so.Bruce Rioja wrote:It'll go for more than that. £85m I reckon.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!
One of the painted versions might fetch that, but this is only pastel.
None of the big galleries are spending that kind of cash at the moment, but it could be interesting if some oil money gets thrown at it with a couple of determined bidders.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Er, no, not quite. We were discussing one painting, and whoever pays that sort of money; it's immaterial in knowing who they are or not. However, I'll withdraw my "just my opinion" view in the light of your own all-seeing, all-knowing, batter everybody over the head until they agree, one then. Not much point in having an opinion against such omnipotence really, is there?thebish wrote: nope. it just reinforces the idea that Tango appears to regard people who don't happen to agree with his own "just my opinion" view and worth of art are "silly fxckers", even if he doesn't yet know who they are!!
Carry on screaming.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
TANGODANCER wrote:Er, no, not quite. We were discussing one painting, and whoever pays that sort of money; it's immaterial in knowing who they are or not. However, I'll withdraw my "just my opinion" view in the light of your own all-seeing, all-knowing, batter everybody over the head until they agree, one then. Not much point in having an opinion against such omnipotence really, is there?thebish wrote: nope. it just reinforces the idea that Tango appears to regard people who don't happen to agree with his own "just my opinion" view and worth of art are "silly fxckers", even if he doesn't yet know who they are!!
Carry on screaming.
I'm not calling ANYONE a silly fxcker...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Go on, I'll bet you a tenner it doesn't go for more than £60million?Bruce Rioja wrote:Well, let's see.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I actually don't think so.Bruce Rioja wrote:It'll go for more than that. £85m I reckon.thebish wrote:mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To be fair, he is trying to get £50million for the thing!
One of the painted versions might fetch that, but this is only pastel.
None of the big galleries are spending that kind of cash at the moment, but it could be interesting if some oil money gets thrown at it with a couple of determined bidders.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Completely ballsed this up... the couple of sources I read seemed to suggest that the Berger four-part series would be screened throughout the two weeks, when if fact it was shown just once, on the 4th April, with other bits and pieces about Berger on the other dates.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:FT says it's being shown 3-17 April at BFI Southbank - let me know if you're coming down. Plenty else to see at the moment too - Picasso, Freud, Hockney...William the White wrote:I hear a call from afar...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Interesting article on the front page of the FT arts section today about John Berger's seminal TV series 'Ways of Seeing', first shown in 1972 and about to enjoy a screening at the BFI in April. Any of our left-leaning art lovers remember this from first time round?
It's fab...
The book from the series remains on the reading list of many a Uni art department - including my daughter's (Lancaster). We have two copies here - mine and my wife's. Purchased before we met.
Do not miss. What is the date - I might come down myself.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Crumpets. jam and tea at Hoylake says it gets £85Mmummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Go on, I'll bet you a tenner it doesn't go for more than £60million?

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Apart from The Scream I hardly knew Munch's work at all.
Prompted by this thread I've been taking a look around. He was absolutely brilliant. One os the most emotionally powerful artists I've ever come across.
A very good reason for a weekend in Oslo...
http://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/en/collect ... al_museum/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prompted by this thread I've been taking a look around. He was absolutely brilliant. One os the most emotionally powerful artists I've ever come across.
A very good reason for a weekend in Oslo...
http://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/en/collect ... al_museum/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests