Bottom 5 fixtures
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 9:32 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Sponge wrote:BWFC_Insane wrote:Eh?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:No thats not what i've said though is it? The manager as the guy with whom the buck stops obviously has a part to play. But as i've said elsewhere- at a different time, when actually the picture was more gloomy than it is now- this season was always going to be a difficult one and, for my money, Coyle has done as well as anyone could be expected to have done.Hoboh wrote:So you don't think our position as feck all to do with Coyle then?lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:so ... if we go down it will be because of the manager and if we stay up it will be in spite of the manager.
correct?
can't help thinking there's a bit more to it than that meself.
Now obviously he has "issues" as a manager - and i doubt i need to highlight them here (there's plenty more qualified to go on about inflexibility and tactical naievety)- but on the whole i take the view that his general stewardship of the club has been good. Who do we want - Dalglish? In fact- and i acknowledge i am possibly adopting this position because i'm p@ssed off with the whole negativity surrounding Coyle- i'd go so far to say that IF he keeps us up/ we stay up OC could be regarded as a candidate for Manager of the Season.
Fact of the matter is none of us like to see the club struggling but scapegoating has never been my bag
I don't understand that.
Even given the injury situation this year, we've underperformed. Badly.
No we haven't. We're probably about right, give or take.
Give or take what ?? 5 Points ? Get real, if 29 points from 32 games is probably right, then you're saying we deserve relegation, and if thats right its down to the manager. His team his players and his bloody mindedness is what has cost us.
Born to be a Wanderer!!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
Some say Wisdom comes with age, I may be the exception !!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Plus maybe the other nineteen teams, their players and managers with the same amabitions and targets?Turkish Trotter wrote: Give or take what ?? 5 Points ? Get real, if 29 points from 32 games is probably right, then you're saying we deserve relegation, and if thats right its down to the manager. His team his players and his bloody mindedness is what has cost us.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Small squad, too many injuries to key players. Coyle has made some crazy decisions at times but as far as I can see since the ream thing at city he's picked sensible sides and made decent substitutions.The question of who would want to manage us is an important one. As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31632
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Would he be allowed considering he doesn't have his 'A' license?
(Hypothetically speaking, of course)
(Hypothetically speaking, of course)
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31632
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Exemptions usually arrive as if by magic, even if only temporary. It's the Roeder Rule.boltonboris wrote:Would he be allowed considering he doesn't have his 'A' license?
(Hypothetically speaking, of course)
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Precisely.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Jeez - I thought I was in the "unoptimistic crowd" - we could have also done a Sunderland.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Precisely.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
Glass is always half empty with you folks.

Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Worthy4England wrote:Jeez - I thought I was in the "unoptimistic crowd" - we could have also done a Sunderland.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Precisely.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
yeah - but would it have been worth employing Steve Bruce in the first place in order to do it??

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Go down with the lowest ever points................. twice?Worthy4England wrote: we could have also done a Sunderland.

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Ha yes of course,O'Neill and Mourinho were sniffing about pre xmas but we told them chancers to sling their hooksWorthy4England wrote:Jeez - I thought I was in the "unoptimistic crowd" - we could have also done a Sunderland.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Precisely.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
Glass is always half empty with you folks.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Conversely there would have only been Aloysius Wardrobe, manager of non-League Upper Bollocks FC, remotely interested...Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Ha yes of course,O'Neill and Mourinho were sniffing about pre xmas but we told them chancers to sling their hooksWorthy4England wrote:Jeez - I thought I was in the "unoptimistic crowd" - we could have also done a Sunderland.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Precisely.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:What, promoted Sandy Stewart?Ianmooreslovechild wrote: As someone already said,we could have done a wolves.
Glass is always half empty with you folks.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Course,who can say but,you look at wolves(and they are similar size/position) and what came out of the tree when they shook it. Steve Bruce, Neil Warnock,Alan Curbishley etc and who was the only one ultimately willing? So well you know I dont have massive belief that anything other than has beens or lower leaguers with potential(and risk ie like coyle) would be our options. Wolves ultimately passed or were passed on at a time when they looked as capable of staying up as we did.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Well, I'd hazard a guess that Steve Bruce is a better manager than their current incumbent. Mind you I'd hazard a guess that their previous manager is a better manager than their current incumbent too. We are led to believe that Bruce didn't take the reins because he was only offered a short term deal. We have no notion if they spoke to anyone else.Ianmooreslovechild wrote:Course,who can say but,you look at wolves(and they are similar size/position) and what came out of the tree when they shook it. Steve Bruce, Neil Warnock,Alan Curbishley etc and who was the only one ultimately willing? So well you know I dont have massive belief that anything other than has beens or lower leaguers with potential(and risk ie like coyle) would be our options. Wolves ultimately passed or were passed on at a time when they looked as capable of staying up as we did.
There's plenty of times, as I've watched the pure cluelessness this season that I'd have willingly contemplated two of the three people you mention.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Curbishly stated some sort of strange management structure and nobody knowing at the club who does what, as his reason for not signing up didn't he?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Get a bet on Wigan and QPR to go down!
You heard it here first!
You heard it here first!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
And Bruce reckoned they changed their minds at the last minute for some reason,possibly after they had met him face to face(happens a lot to him apparently, poor love)boltonboris wrote:Curbishly stated some sort of strange management structure and nobody knowing at the club who does what, as his reason for not signing up didn't he?
Ok imagaining we had a choice of Bruce Warnock and Curbishley it's not that inspiring. Bruce on a downbward spiral, warnock never succeeded at the top tho never really backed either, curbishly decent at charlton but wasnt he a disaster at west ham(possibly thried to play the west ham way!) Not sure any would have been a better bet to keep us up.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38822
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
Curbishley was not a disaster at all at West Ham......Ianmooreslovechild wrote:And Bruce reckoned they changed their minds at the last minute for some reason,possibly after they had met him face to face(happens a lot to him apparently, poor love)boltonboris wrote:Curbishly stated some sort of strange management structure and nobody knowing at the club who does what, as his reason for not signing up didn't he?
Ok imagaining we had a choice of Bruce Warnock and Curbishley it's not that inspiring. Bruce on a downbward spiral, warnock never succeeded at the top tho never really backed either, curbishly decent at charlton but wasnt he a disaster at west ham(possibly thried to play the west ham way!) Not sure any would have been a better bet to keep us up.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Bottom 5 fixtures
No you're right. Dont know why I remembered it as a bad spell. He kept them up then got them a top ten finish before resigning on principalsince when there has been a legal wrangle. Having read that he'd certainly have been the best of the 3BWFC_Insane wrote:Curbishley was not a disaster at all at West Ham......Ianmooreslovechild wrote:And Bruce reckoned they changed their minds at the last minute for some reason,possibly after they had met him face to face(happens a lot to him apparently, poor love)boltonboris wrote:Curbishly stated some sort of strange management structure and nobody knowing at the club who does what, as his reason for not signing up didn't he?
Ok imagaining we had a choice of Bruce Warnock and Curbishley it's not that inspiring. Bruce on a downbward spiral, warnock never succeeded at the top tho never really backed either, curbishly decent at charlton but wasnt he a disaster at west ham(possibly thried to play the west ham way!) Not sure any would have been a better bet to keep us up.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 26 guests