Stu Holden Recovery Show

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38886
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri May 11, 2012 10:04 am

NRC slapped a transfer request in at West Ham as soon as they survived on the last day at OT.........

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14516
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by boltonboris » Fri May 11, 2012 10:17 am

That's because he was aggrieved that all the players were massively overpaid, work-shy prima-donna's with absolutely no self-respect when it came to earning their coin wasn't it?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31709
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri May 11, 2012 12:27 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:NRC slapped a transfer request in at West Ham as soon as they survived on the last day at OT.........
So you're saying he'll submit a request if we stay up? :conf:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38886
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri May 11, 2012 12:30 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:NRC slapped a transfer request in at West Ham as soon as they survived on the last day at OT.........
So you're saying he'll submit a request if we stay up? :conf:
No, just that he has "history".

Hopefully he'll be happy to stay whatever happens, but time will tell!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by TANGODANCER » Fri May 11, 2012 12:37 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:NRC slapped a transfer request in at West Ham as soon as they survived on the last day at OT.........
It's our last game BWFCi. Surely you must have just "one" post that doesn't depress the fxck out of me. Surely....?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by thebish » Fri May 11, 2012 12:50 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:NRC slapped a transfer request in at West Ham as soon as they survived on the last day at OT.........
It's our last game BWFCi. Surely you must have just "one" post that doesn't depress the fxck out of me. Surely....?

not fair Tangster - BWFCi has posted VERY positively in the OUR CLUB thread about yelling himself hoarse at the game - and that we can do it. he'll be there shouting for the team - which is more than you or I will be...

go over and have a look - it's quite inspiring!! 8)
Last edited by thebish on Fri May 11, 2012 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jakerbeef
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1288
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:57 am

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Jakerbeef » Fri May 11, 2012 12:53 pm

Mar wrote:
Prufrock wrote:I can't see Reo-Coker slapping in a transfer request Defoe style. I'd not be surprised if he left, but I think he'd do it a bit more quietly. Seems to 'get' fans. (Isn't that why he and Bellamy fell out?). Holden. I think he cares, but equally I think he is ambitious. When he was on Football Focus he talked about ambitions of Champions League football. He was diplomatic enough to say he hoped it would be with Bolton, but I don't think he'd sacrifice his career for us, and nor should he. Like Cahill, ambitious, but respectful.

Completely forgot about that Defoe incident. Now that was a scummy move. I also remember his play acting in the game against us thinking 'cheat'. Since then he's been coming across a lot better but those WHU days. :crazy:
That's probably just the WHam way. He's a Boltoner now.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Tombwfc » Sat May 12, 2012 2:25 pm

At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Hoboh » Sat May 12, 2012 2:29 pm

Tombwfc wrote:At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.
I don't either, nor chungy

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 12, 2012 7:06 pm

Tombwfc wrote:At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.
Whoa up there Tom. He unfortunately got injured doing what he's (well) paid to do, and then, presumably carried on drawing chunks for doing nothing, while the club get him back fit. Surely there has to be some sense of obligation there? What have the club had for their money? Not like he's a third choice reserve really, is it? He was very much a key player.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by bobo the clown » Sat May 12, 2012 7:17 pm

There needs to be no 'sense of obligation' Tango. Sorry. Their contract allowed for payment if injured & that's what has happened.

Now, whether they, as people, have that viewpoint is another matter. I suspect you'd have to know them to see how tht pans out. For me I'd like to think they will & will help get us back up, but they are under zero obligation to do so.

Our strongest hand is that they are under contract so a fee would be due and after such an absence clubs will want a long look to see how they recover, mentally and physically.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Tombwfc » Sat May 12, 2012 9:17 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.
Whoa up there Tom. He unfortunately got injured doing what he's (well) paid to do, and then, presumably carried on drawing chunks for doing nothing, while the club get him back fit. Surely there has to be some sense of obligation there? What have the club had for their money? Not like he's a third choice reserve really, is it? He was very much a key player.
The club helped to get him back to fitness because we were contractually obliged to, and because he's one of our better players. It wasn't charity. If Zat Knight blew his cruciate tomorrow, would anyone be suggesting we give him a new contract and see him back to health?

As fans, we don't expect the club to show loyalty to anyone, unless we think they can benefit the team on the pitch. Why should players show loyalty to the club, unless they think the club can benefit their careers? (I.e playing in the Premier League)

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 12, 2012 9:24 pm

Tombwfc wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.
Whoa up there Tom. He unfortunately got injured doing what he's (well) paid to do, and then, presumably carried on drawing chunks for doing nothing, while the club get him back fit. Surely there has to be some sense of obligation there? What have the club had for their money? Not like he's a third choice reserve really, is it? He was very much a key player.
The club helped to get him back to fitness because we were contractually obliged to, and because he's one of our better players. It wasn't charity. If Zat Knight blew his cruciate tomorrow, would anyone be suggesting we give him a new contract and see him back to health?

As fans, we don't expect the club to show loyalty to anyone, unless we think they can benefit the team on the pitch. Why should players show loyalty to the club, unless they think the club can benefit their careers? (I.e playing in the Premier League)
Possibly for the huge amount of money the club puts in their hands every week? Just a thought.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by Tombwfc » Sat May 12, 2012 11:43 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Tombwfc wrote:At the end of the day, it's a short career and Holden has already lost large chunks of his due to injury. While he's been out (not because he's been out), it's all gone to shit. Were we to surrender our place in the league on Sunday, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to stay.
Whoa up there Tom. He unfortunately got injured doing what he's (well) paid to do, and then, presumably carried on drawing chunks for doing nothing, while the club get him back fit. Surely there has to be some sense of obligation there? What have the club had for their money? Not like he's a third choice reserve really, is it? He was very much a key player.
The club helped to get him back to fitness because we were contractually obliged to, and because he's one of our better players. It wasn't charity. If Zat Knight blew his cruciate tomorrow, would anyone be suggesting we give him a new contract and see him back to health?

As fans, we don't expect the club to show loyalty to anyone, unless we think they can benefit the team on the pitch. Why should players show loyalty to the club, unless they think the club can benefit their careers? (I.e playing in the Premier League)
Possibly for the huge amount of money the club puts in their hands every week? Just a thought.
Players under contract have no obligation to want to stay, any more than we have the obligation not to want to sell players who are under contract. You can't have it both ways.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Stu Holden Recovery Show

Post by TKIZ! » Sun May 13, 2012 2:00 pm

Holden's stated that regardless of which division we're playing in he's staying. His father's parents are season ticketholders and they've asked him to stay
Pfffft.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], truewhite15 and 50 guests