Andy Walker

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Andy Walker

Post by officer_dibble » Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:18 am

I think footballs different now. in 96/97 you could chuck a 442 out andthe players we had were (1) better than everyone elses; and (2) a good unit, fought for each other. My view (though norm did post a good counter the other day) is that organisation and tactics count for a lot at this level. I dont think a 96/97 is possible anymore.

Id be happy with an organised team, players in the right position, and playing to its potential. We should be using our premiership facilities to the maximum as well - so using the video room to prepare for matches, study opponents...not making dvds to send to the fa.

Loyal White
Promising
Promising
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Andy Walker

Post by Loyal White » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:09 am

Look at the leaders we had in that team though, Branagan, Fairclough, Taggart, Pollock, Frandsen, McGinlay.

Not only could they all play, they brought the best out of the others like Blake and Sellars (who was absolutely magnificent that season).

Now we've just got a team of hiders, no leadership.

On a side note, those saying Todd mixed it up in our first Prem season, he also picked Curcic and Sellars as a midfield against the filth. I'd rather forget the consequences.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Andy Walker

Post by bwfcdan94 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:13 am

Loyal White wrote:Look at the leaders we had in that team though, Branagan, Fairclough, Taggart, Pollock, Frandsen, McGinlay.

Not only could they all play, they brought the best out of the others like Blake and Sellars (who was absolutely magnificent that season).

Now we've just got a team of hiders, no leadership.

On a side note, those saying Todd mixed it up in our first Prem season, he also picked Curcic and Sellars as a midfield against the filth. I'd rather forget the consequences.
Cahill Robbo. who do we have now other than maybe Mills
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

Leyther_Matt
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 986
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Leigh

Re: Andy Walker

Post by Leyther_Matt » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:04 am

Loyal White wrote:Look at the leaders we had in that team though, Branagan, Fairclough, Taggart, Pollock, Frandsen, McGinlay.

Not only could they all play, they brought the best out of the others like Blake and Sellars (who was absolutely magnificent that season).

Now we've just got a team of hiders, no leadership.
Think you're definitely on to summat there. You missed out Sheridan as well.

I think people criticise Todd a little too easily with regards to 97/98 as well - don't forget we were effectively a bent refereeing decision away from staying up that year, and who knows how things might have panned out thereafter.
This is the rhythm of Zat Knight

midlands exile
Promising
Promising
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:24 pm

Re: Andy Walker

Post by midlands exile » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:38 pm

Leyther_Matt wrote:
Loyal White wrote:Look at the leaders we had in that team though, Branagan, Fairclough, Taggart, Pollock, Frandsen, McGinlay.

Not only could they all play, they brought the best out of the others like Blake and Sellars (who was absolutely magnificent that season).

Now we've just got a team of hiders, no leadership.
Think you're definitely on to summat there. You missed out Sheridan as well.

I think people criticise Todd a little too easily with regards to 97/98 as well - don't forget we were effectively a bent refereeing decision away from staying up that year, and who knows how things might have panned out thereafter.
My thoughts exactly. The first season we stayed up with Sam was a close run thing too, but gave us a launch pad to progress.

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7016
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Andy Walker

Post by Mar » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:47 pm

midlands exile wrote:
Leyther_Matt wrote:
Loyal White wrote:Look at the leaders we had in that team though, Branagan, Fairclough, Taggart, Pollock, Frandsen, McGinlay.

Not only could they all play, they brought the best out of the others like Blake and Sellars (who was absolutely magnificent that season).

Now we've just got a team of hiders, no leadership.
Think you're definitely on to summat there. You missed out Sheridan as well.

I think people criticise Todd a little too easily with regards to 97/98 as well - don't forget we were effectively a bent refereeing decision away from staying up that year, and who knows how things might have panned out thereafter.
My thoughts exactly. The first season we stayed up with Sam was a close run thing too, but gave us a launch pad to progress.
The second season under Sam was an even closer run thing. We only really came good the third season in.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests