Technology Thread.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Technology Thread.
I think it allows your computer to control a remote computer over a network. Tech support types use it to take over your computer so they can fix things without running over (lazy buggers). I don't think it is especially sinister.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34749
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
It's a bit of software that allows you to control a computer remotely. So all the processing is done at the far end from you (where your servers are located) or someone coming into your computer from wherever they are located.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I think it allows your computer to control a remote computer over a network. Tech support types use it to take over your computer so they can fix things without running over (lazy buggers). I don't think it is especially sinister.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Technology Thread.
Ah right. I thought that that was what this LogMeIn thing was forAbdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is for remote control sessions I think. You know, like when the IT geeks take over your PC and click on shit to make it better. This is usually after telling you to reboot it several times, unplug it and other useless shite.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9722
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Technology Thread.
logmein is similar software. Never used it so couldn't tell you what it might do different. Just don't press the fn key and 7th key in from the left togetherBruce Rioja wrote:Ah right. I thought that that was what this LogMeIn thing was forAbdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is for remote control sessions I think. You know, like when the IT geeks take over your PC and click on shit to make it better. This is usually after telling you to reboot it several times, unplug it and other useless shite.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34749
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
It is too....Bruce Rioja wrote:Ah right. I thought that that was what this LogMeIn thing was forAbdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is for remote control sessions I think. You know, like when the IT geeks take over your PC and click on shit to make it better. This is usually after telling you to reboot it several times, unplug it and other useless shite.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?
It depends whether they've been installed to access your PC or whether your using them to access back-end server systems...
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Technology Thread.
Nah, I think that the LogMeIn jobbie is there so that the bods can sort my shit out on here when I've fecked things up........... againWorthy4England wrote:It is too....Bruce Rioja wrote:Ah right. I thought that that was what this LogMeIn thing was forAbdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is for remote control sessions I think. You know, like when the IT geeks take over your PC and click on shit to make it better. This is usually after telling you to reboot it several times, unplug it and other useless shite.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?
It depends whether they've been installed to access your PC or whether your using them to access back-end server systems...

I assume that the other one is the one that lets me access certain parts of the company server. Though I could well be wrong.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34749
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
Ok uVNC is just a different type of the same thing as LogMeIn...Bruce Rioja wrote:Nah, the LogMeIn jobbie is there so that the bods can sort my shit out on here when I've fecked things up........... againWorthy4England wrote:It is too....Bruce Rioja wrote:Ah right. I thought that that was what this LogMeIn thing was forAbdoulaye's Twin wrote:It is for remote control sessions I think. You know, like when the IT geeks take over your PC and click on shit to make it better. This is usually after telling you to reboot it several times, unplug it and other useless shite.Bruce Rioja wrote:Any of you know what a UltraVNC Viewer is? Is that the thing that lets me connect with the company server or something more sinister?
It depends whether they've been installed to access your PC or whether your using them to access back-end server systems...
I assume that the other one is the one that lets me access certain parts of the company server. Though I could well be wrong.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
I'm trying to follow what you said. I think you bought a tablet for £200 less than an ipad but it might have been £350, as long as you bought fom yourself.Worthy4England wrote:Read what I said.Wandering Willy wrote:So other than having to know someone to get it cheap and having to load another OS on it for it to do what you want it do, it's better than an ipad.Worthy4England wrote: Oh that'd be in then!
I have to say I wouldn't have bothered at all, but they were flogging them off cheap at work. So I actually got it around £350 cheaper than the iPad 64gb. In fairness, it had a proprietary OS on it, which was probably the best in the market place, but no Apps - because the dense tw@t that headed up that Division must've thought that people would buy it for it's OS...
It did work great out of the box, but I figured lobbing Android OS on it would give access to more apps, so that's what I did. Took about an hour of my time.
I said I have a tablet - I'm not sure what I get additional for the £200 extra (at list price).
What I got it for was well over the £200 less than a 64Gb iPad - nearer £350. The someone I know is me, so I didn't have to know anyone else. It took me an hour to re-flash the ROM to Android and most of that was download time.
What do I get extra for what was around £350? Other than the brand name?
You're not sure, so neither am I. Nonetheless, it's better than an ipad if you can reprogram it.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Technology Thread.
I've an idea. Let's get a1 to explain it to Willy - that'll keep him quiet for a while.Wandering Willy wrote:I'm trying to follow what you said. I think you bought a tablet for £200 less than an ipad but it might have been £350, as long as you bought fom yourself.Worthy4England wrote:Read what I said.Wandering Willy wrote:So other than having to know someone to get it cheap and having to load another OS on it for it to do what you want it do, it's better than an ipad.Worthy4England wrote: Oh that'd be in then!
I have to say I wouldn't have bothered at all, but they were flogging them off cheap at work. So I actually got it around £350 cheaper than the iPad 64gb. In fairness, it had a proprietary OS on it, which was probably the best in the market place, but no Apps - because the dense tw@t that headed up that Division must've thought that people would buy it for it's OS...
It did work great out of the box, but I figured lobbing Android OS on it would give access to more apps, so that's what I did. Took about an hour of my time.
I said I have a tablet - I'm not sure what I get additional for the £200 extra (at list price).
What I got it for was well over the £200 less than a 64Gb iPad - nearer £350. The someone I know is me, so I didn't have to know anyone else. It took me an hour to re-flash the ROM to Android and most of that was download time.
What do I get extra for what was around £350? Other than the brand name?
You're not sure, so neither am I. Nonetheless, it's better than an ipad if you can reprogram it.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34749
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
I'm dead sure. Dead sure this is pointless.Wandering Willy wrote:I'm trying to follow what you said. I think you bought a tablet for £200 less than an ipad but it might have been £350, as long as you bought fom yourself.Worthy4England wrote:Read what I said.Wandering Willy wrote:So other than having to know someone to get it cheap and having to load another OS on it for it to do what you want it do, it's better than an ipad.Worthy4England wrote: Oh that'd be in then!
I have to say I wouldn't have bothered at all, but they were flogging them off cheap at work. So I actually got it around £350 cheaper than the iPad 64gb. In fairness, it had a proprietary OS on it, which was probably the best in the market place, but no Apps - because the dense tw@t that headed up that Division must've thought that people would buy it for it's OS...
It did work great out of the box, but I figured lobbing Android OS on it would give access to more apps, so that's what I did. Took about an hour of my time.
I said I have a tablet - I'm not sure what I get additional for the £200 extra (at list price).
What I got it for was well over the £200 less than a 64Gb iPad - nearer £350. The someone I know is me, so I didn't have to know anyone else. It took me an hour to re-flash the ROM to Android and most of that was download time.
What do I get extra for what was around £350? Other than the brand name?
You're not sure, so neither am I. Nonetheless, it's better than an ipad if you can reprogram it.
Whatever.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Technology Thread.

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Technology Thread.
If you think you've got exactly what you need then you've been sucked in, because I guarantee that in ten years time look back on whatever it is you've got presently and think what a pile of wank.boltonboris wrote:Wrong, we've been 'sucked' into thinking we're buying exactly what we want. Which is why we buy them. If I didn't want one, I wouldn't buy one. What makes you assume that people who purchase technologies are somehow duped and not able to think for themselves?
I find people's constant criticism of other people choice of purchase both baffling and downright irritating
I'm sorry I'm irritating... actually, fxck it, I'm not, sorry that is. You'll live get over it.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Technology Thread.
I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Technology Thread.
indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Technology Thread.
Am I coming across as enraged? I'm not. If you read back I posted that there were 3 pages of 'discussion' around whether Apple was the dog's bollocks or not - I commented on that and got boltonboris on my case. I'm hardly enraged, more despondent.thebish wrote:indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Technology Thread.
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:If you think you've got exactly what you need then you've been sucked in, because I guarantee that in ten years time look back on whatever it is you've got presently and think what a pile of wank.boltonboris wrote:Wrong, we've been 'sucked' into thinking we're buying exactly what we want. Which is why we buy them. If I didn't want one, I wouldn't buy one. What makes you assume that people who purchase technologies are somehow duped and not able to think for themselves?
I find people's constant criticism of other people choice of purchase both baffling and downright irritating
I'm sorry I'm irritating... actually, fxck it, I'm not, sorry that is. You'll live get over it.
The first quote is why you've got Boris on your case. You said he'd been sucked in by thinking he needed one.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Am I coming across as enraged? I'm not. If you read back I posted that there were 3 pages of 'discussion' around whether Apple was the dog's bollocks or not - I commented on that and got boltonboris on my case. I'm hardly enraged, more despondent.thebish wrote:indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Technology Thread.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhsh. I think he's gone away.Annoyed Grunt wrote: The first quote is why you've got Boris on your case. You said he'd been sucked in by thinking he needed one.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: Technology Thread.
I thought we'd established that the General had just bought a tank top and was defending his right to bare arms?thebish wrote:indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Technology Thread.
Ouch.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I thought we'd established that the General had just bought a tank top and was defending his right to bare arms?thebish wrote:indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Technology Thread.
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I thought we'd established that the General had just bought a tank top and was defending his right to bare arms?thebish wrote:indeed - that's pretty much how advertising works - i'm not sure why LLS seems so surprised or enraged in this particular case. Advertising persuades us to want a load of stuff we don't really need... it's what makes the economy go round...boltonboris wrote:I have never once thought I needed it. What makes you think that? I WANTED one, so I bought one. If that somehow bothers, that I WANTED one, so bought one, then that's none of my concern.
most of the stuff i have, I don't really NEED - and I'm sure most people on the forum are in the same position*.
*(with the possible exception of the General who couldn't imagine life without his i-pad)

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests