The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: The Politics Thread

don't understand this at all.
Re: The Politics Thread
why the shock?? it's been trailed for weeks... and - it's ages off in the long grass - and qualified by the idea that he will have succeeded in a major renegotiation of our position in europe beforehand...
it's just a tactic to see off UKIP - he won't deliver on it as he can always claim he never got the hoped-for renegotiation...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Politics Thread
do you think he means it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
I don't know... I doubt he really expects a Conservative majority next time out, for one thing.thebish wrote:do you think he means it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Politics Thread
you think that's what he's banking on? do you think he'd follow through if they did achieve a majority? (and with UKIP's flush busted - they have a slightly better shot at it...)mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I don't know... I doubt he really expects a Conservative majority next time out, for one thing.thebish wrote:do you think he means it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
I don't know what he's banking on, but the 'promise' was contingent on a Conservative majority.thebish wrote:you think that's what he's banking on? do you think he'd follow through if they did achieve a majority? (and with UKIP's flush busted - they have a slightly better shot at it...)mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I don't know... I doubt he really expects a Conservative majority next time out, for one thing.thebish wrote:do you think he means it?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
If he gets a majority, I don't see how he has any choice but to follow through with it now.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: The Politics Thread
Then surely he's stitching himself up. He wants to renegotiate then put it to a referendum...but if the renegotiation doesn't occur (which implies he thinks Britain is worse off) he won't put it to vote? He'll be torn apart for that. That will only increase pressure for a referendum.thebish wrote:
why the shock?? it's been trailed for weeks... and - it's ages off in the long grass - and qualified by the idea that he will have succeeded in a major renegotiation of our position in europe beforehand...
it's just a tactic to see off UKIP - he won't deliver on it as he can always claim he never got the hoped-for renegotiation...
The whole thing just seems rather messy and ill-thought. In the short term, what will happen -allow the conservatives to steal votes from UKIP? Polls have shown UKIP voters care more about immigration than EU membership. Europe is in a flux as it is. Why not wait to see what the terrain is like once we get over the hill? Instead, we've got a PM promising a new deal on Europe (when, in all fairness, we have a pretty decent one as it is), we've pissed off our main export and import market in the EU and, should this renegotiation Cameron sees vital comes into fruition, he's going to essentially put it to a fecking coin-flip.
I just can't rationalise it, that's the annoying thing.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Politics Thread
You and bish both used the word 'trailed' and I don't really understand what it means. I would understand 'trialed' better in the sense of floated as a trial balloon. Does it mean that the idea has been mooted for some time to get a general reaction before the PM actually says anything?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Yes. Perhaps it's a British idiom.Montreal Wanderer wrote:You and bish both used the word 'trailed' and I don't really understand what it means. I would understand 'trialed' better in the sense of floated as a trial balloon. Does it mean that the idea has been mooted for some time to get a general reaction before the PM actually says anything?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yeah, it's been trailed for a long time, but it's still a big moment to hear a UK Prime Minister speak in those terms.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
How do you 'piss off' a market?mrkint wrote: we've pissed off our main export and import market in the EU
As I keep saying to the LK, the main thing the EU gets from us in return for giving us access to its market is access to our market.
I don't see that the UK and the EU not having reciprocal access to each other's markets is likely, whatever eventually comes to pass.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: The Politics Thread
Stand on its roof and let loose, I suppose.
Indeed, I was just using that to illustrate a point of how closely we are intertwined with them. and similarly the main thing we get from them is access to their market.
All just seems a bit short term gain taking precedent over long term interests. Though I dunno i haven't debated politics in a while so i could be getting rusty.
And what is Cameron hoping to actually achieve, tangibly, with the renegotiation? I can't seem to find anything
Indeed, I was just using that to illustrate a point of how closely we are intertwined with them. and similarly the main thing we get from them is access to their market.
All just seems a bit short term gain taking precedent over long term interests. Though I dunno i haven't debated politics in a while so i could be getting rusty.
And what is Cameron hoping to actually achieve, tangibly, with the renegotiation? I can't seem to find anything

Re: The Politics Thread
I doubt he'll ever make that crystal clear - if he did, then after the renegotiation he would have to have delivered something specific in order to proclaim his renegotiation a triumph for Britain... if he is vague about it - then just about any outcome to this renegotiation can be spun as a triumph given that none of us (with the exception of LK and Mummy) have the faintest idea how any of it works!mrkint wrote: And what is Cameron hoping to actually achieve, tangibly, with the renegotiation? I can't seem to find anything
listening to the response from some of our EU partners today - they seem likely to be polite but dismissive... they are characterising Cameron's approach as "cherry-picking" (the Germans) and "a-la-carte Europe" (the french)...
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: The Politics Thread
I'm just puzzled as to why say this now, when we have the negotiations coming up. By all means declare intentions for a referendum after the negotiation, but doing it before? It's bloody stupid.
Re: The Politics Thread
basically - here's why...mrkint wrote:I'm just puzzled as to why say this now, when we have the negotiations coming up. By all means declare intentions for a referendum after the negotiation, but doing it before? It's bloody stupid.

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
To strengthen our hand by suggesting that we really might leave if we don't get what we want?mrkint wrote:I'm just puzzled as to why say this now, when we have the negotiations coming up. By all means declare intentions for a referendum after the negotiation, but doing it before? It's bloody stupid.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Politics Thread
how scared are the rest of Europe by that threat?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To strengthen our hand by suggesting that we really might leave if we don't get what we want?mrkint wrote:I'm just puzzled as to why say this now, when we have the negotiations coming up. By all means declare intentions for a referendum after the negotiation, but doing it before? It's bloody stupid.
he must have considered the balance of outcomes - but I suspect he has opened a can of worms in his own party as backbenchers demand a shopping list of specific concessions... and pundits demand to know where his "red lines" are and under what circumstances (if any) he would campaign for us to leave Europe... of course he won't answer these questions - but their repetition could make him look less decisive than he intends depending on how he handles it..
of course - labour have already made a bit of a stuff up in their response - and the ball is very much in their court...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
I have no idea... but I do know that they don't really want us out.thebish wrote:how scared are the rest of Europe by that threat?mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:To strengthen our hand by suggesting that we really might leave if we don't get what we want?mrkint wrote:I'm just puzzled as to why say this now, when we have the negotiations coming up. By all means declare intentions for a referendum after the negotiation, but doing it before? It's bloody stupid.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Politics Thread
I think it'll probably work out all right. I don't like probably though. As Miliband said, putting party politics before the national interest.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Politics Thread
Ah, so that will be why Miliband has made a clear statement ruling out an EU referendum in the future?Prufrock wrote:I think it'll probably work out all right. I don't like probably though. As Miliband said, putting party politics before the national interest.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests