Ambitious Blackburn

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38839
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:42 pm

boltonboris wrote:One of the biggest nights in their recent history.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think it's anything bad.. I'm not one for banging on about attendances, but it's the irony that's lost on the media.

If it was Blackburn taking 500 there, they'd be getting hammered for it
In similar circumstances I'd be surprised if we took many more.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by boltonboris » Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:46 pm

Me too. I think we probably took less to Spurs and IIRC before the Muamba incident happened, it was all the media / other fans wanted to talk about.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bwfcdan94 » Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:56 pm

Millwall are a very small club though and anyway you should not be encouraging their fans to travel in large numbers should you now (would say similar about Burnley and a couple of others). It is obvious that the F.A are praying for Wigan to win that semi final and the journo w**kers are praying for Millwall to reach the final.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by CrazyHorse » Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:52 am

Doctor Who embarrassed at Blackburn Rovers.

Doctor Who actor Matt Smith says he is "embarrassed" to be a fan of struggling Blackburn Rovers.
The Lancashire club are languishing in the Championship following relegation from the Premier League last season.

Smith told BBC Radio 5 live the side's FA Cup exit at the hands of Millwall in midweek was "woeful".

He said: "We're playing like a team without any verve or quality. Sort it out Shebby Singh, sort it out Venky's - we are not happy."

Smith, said he was not impressed with the way the club had been run since the takeover by the Rao family - owners of the Venky's brand - in November 2010.

At the time, Blackburn were 14th in the Premier League, two points above the relegation zone. The following month Sam Allardyce was sacked as manager and Steve Kean placed in charge with the club 13th and five points off the relegation zone.

Rovers only avoided relegation on the final day of the season and dropped to the Championship the following year after a season marked by increasingly vocal protests against the club's management by fans.
Highly regarded chief executive John Williams was one of the higher-profile departures from the club following the takeover and the more recent appointment of global advisor Shebby Singh had led to talk of a power struggle at Ewood Park.

Kean resigned in September 2012 and was replaced by former player Henning Berg but his reign lasted just 57 days.

Michael Appleton was appointed boss in January and enjoyed three successive victories in his early weeks. However recent results have been poor, despite an FA Cup win over Arsenal.

That victory will have seemed a long time ago for many of the 8,635 supporters who saw Blackburn dumped out of the cup while delivering what Appleton called a "disappointing" display.

And for Smith, it marked a low point in the recent history of the club: "It's an absolute farce, a joke, it's being run by complete numpties. Great players, great team, great club and those berks have ruined it," he told 5 live's Kicking Off programme.

"They talk about getting rid of Allardyce because of the long ball - what the hell was that against Millwall?

"It was a woeful performance against Millwall. It's the first time I've been embarrassed at the way the team played."

Blackburn's next game is against fierce rivals Burnley at Ewood Park on Sunday.
Businesswoman of the year.

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Enoch » Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:57 am

I'd have thought he might have thrown some light on how it all turns out!

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:32 am

Enoch wrote:I'd have thought he might have thrown some light on how it all turns out!
No, he traded his TARDIS for tickets to the Millwall game. That's why he is so ticked off.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

bw@bw
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: midlands

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bw@bw » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:09 pm

For once I am supporting Burnley.

Another couple of weeks and we might have both Wolves and Blackburn in the relegation zone
What goes around may still come around

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:15 am

CrazyHorse wrote:Doctor Who embarrassed at Blackburn Rovers.

Doctor Who actor Matt Smith says he is "embarrassed" to be a fan of struggling Blackburn Rovers.
The Lancashire club are languishing in the Championship following relegation from the Premier League last season.

Smith told BBC Radio 5 live the side's FA Cup exit at the hands of Millwall in midweek was "woeful".

He said: "We're playing like a team without any verve or quality. Sort it out Shebby Singh, sort it out Venky's - we are not happy."

Smith, said he was not impressed with the way the club had been run since the takeover by the Rao family - owners of the Venky's brand - in November 2010.

At the time, Blackburn were 14th in the Premier League, two points above the relegation zone. The following month Sam Allardyce was sacked as manager and Steve Kean placed in charge with the club 13th and five points off the relegation zone.

Rovers only avoided relegation on the final day of the season and dropped to the Championship the following year after a season marked by increasingly vocal protests against the club's management by fans.
Highly regarded chief executive John Williams was one of the higher-profile departures from the club following the takeover and the more recent appointment of global advisor Shebby Singh had led to talk of a power struggle at Ewood Park.

Kean resigned in September 2012 and was replaced by former player Henning Berg but his reign lasted just 57 days.

Michael Appleton was appointed boss in January and enjoyed three successive victories in his early weeks. However recent results have been poor, despite an FA Cup win over Arsenal.

That victory will have seemed a long time ago for many of the 8,635 supporters who saw Blackburn dumped out of the cup while delivering what Appleton called a "disappointing" display.

And for Smith, it marked a low point in the recent history of the club: "It's an absolute farce, a joke, it's being run by complete numpties. Great players, great team, great club and those berks have ruined it," he told 5 live's Kicking Off programme.

"They talk about getting rid of Allardyce because of the long ball - what the hell was that against Millwall?

"It was a woeful performance against Millwall. It's the first time I've been embarrassed at the way the team played."

Blackburn's next game is against fierce rivals Burnley at Ewood Park on Sunday.
Strange thing - Matt Smith comes from Northampton. Muppet. (Him, not you Horsey!)
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bwfcdan94 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:22 am

So Blackburn scored in the 96th minute through that fat ba**ard David Dunn. Poor result or Rovers and Sean Dyche says the goal should of been disallowed because the over time given by the forth official had already been played.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:37 am

bwfcdan94 wrote:So Blackburn scored in the 96th minute through that fat ba**ard David Dunn. Poor result or Rovers and Sean Dyche says the goal should of been disallowed because the over time given by the forth official had already been played.
The very reason they say " ... a minimum of x minutes" is following a match at t'Reebok v t'Roverrrrs when Craig Short, I think, scored an equaliser for them in the 7th minute of 4.

Allardyce went ape-shit. They started using these words soon after.

Of course added time can be alloted during added time.

Dyche is being a tit if he argues that.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24833
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Prufrock » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:19 pm

It's not called 'extra time' or 'added time' or anything else the Match of the Day lot use. It's called 'allowed time', because it is the time 'allowed' by the referee, who is the sole arbiter of the laws of the game and sole time-keeper. That said, I don't think criticising him for allowing more time than you think he should have done is any different for criticising him for not giving a penalty he didn't give.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:23 pm

Prufrock wrote:It's not called 'extra time' or 'added time' or anything else the Match of the Day lot use. It's called 'allowed time', because it is the time 'allowed' by the referee, who is the sole arbiter of the laws of the game and sole time-keeper. That said, I don't think criticising him for allowing more time than you think he should have done is any different for criticising him for not giving a penalty he didn't give.
You're just being awkward now. :whack:
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by boltonboris » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:39 pm

I thought the official term was "time added on"
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by jaffka » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:44 pm

I dont know but what I do know is that it is pointless whinging about it

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24833
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Prufrock » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:45 pm

Nope. It's what the entire media use, but it isn't time 'added'. The theory is (and it's tenuous) that the game lasts 90 minutes. The time at the end is 'allowed' by the referee for all the time in the previous actual real-life 90 mins in which the game wasn't being 'played'.

Link to Laws of the Game http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footbal ... 2012_e.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Page 31 talks about 'Allowances for time lost'.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24833
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by Prufrock » Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:47 pm

jaffka wrote:I dont know but what I do know is that it is pointless whinging about it
It's pointless whinging about any referees decisions! It's boring not to though! I wasn't particularly magnanimous when fecking Bellion punched it in after about 26 minutes of added time (feck it it's what people say!)
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38839
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:24 am

Appleton sacked according to reports.

Oh My Days!

mrkint
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by mrkint » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:25 am

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... kburn.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

lawl

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by bobo the clown » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:26 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Appleton sacked according to reports.

Oh My Days!
You are taking the waz, shirley ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

mrkint
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord

Re: Ambitious Blackburn

Post by mrkint » Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:27 am

Doctor Who for boss!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests