The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I saw the Magritte painting at the Magritte exhibition a couple of years ago in Liverpool. They all have more impact in the flesh - he was an interesting bloke and actually a very technically capable painter.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:the Magritte is the Son of Man (no umbrella, I must have dreamt that)mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Which ones?Lost Leopard Spot wrote:The Magritte is a little twee and the Modigliani does not stand up to much scrutinity,
and the Modigliani is Count Wielhorski
I'm not sure why you'd reproductions of either of those two in an office, however.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's a weird collection of art prints that's for sure, kind of loosely based on surrealism, and they've all got numbers [out of 100] on like they are some kind of special edition prints (Berkely 1962, New York can be made out underneath the prints and the numbers in a tiny font, but googling that gives me no clue as to where these originated).
I've seen the Magritte in the flesh too, and is a better painting than a print. As a print it is overwhelmingly twee looking, whereas the painting had a subtlety and a power to it that can't be described adequately.
I've seen the Magritte in the flesh too, and is a better painting than a print. As a print it is overwhelmingly twee looking, whereas the painting had a subtlety and a power to it that can't be described adequately.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: The Great Art Debate
I used to work for the Lancashire Police identikit department...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Yup.
But he still needs to lose the beard, and have bigger bones.
Being a Sioux warrior would help too.

-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: The Great Art Debate
Bish, is this your website?thebish wrote:I used to work for the Lancashire Police identikit department...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Yup.
But he still needs to lose the beard, and have bigger bones.
Being a Sioux warrior would help too.
http://jimllpaintit.tumblr.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: The Great Art Debate
pah! rumbled!!mrkint wrote:Bish, is this your website?thebish wrote:I used to work for the Lancashire Police identikit department...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Yup.
But he still needs to lose the beard, and have bigger bones.
Being a Sioux warrior would help too.
http://jimllpaintit.tumblr.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
That's him. That's CrazyHorse.thebish wrote:I used to work for the Lancashire Police identikit department...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Yup.
But he still needs to lose the beard, and have bigger bones.
Being a Sioux warrior would help too.
[and I could live with that as an art print on our office wall. It's far better than the Modigliani we've got]
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Indeed... they have a quality that it is... well, surreal!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:It's a weird collection of art prints that's for sure, kind of loosely based on surrealism, and they've all got numbers [out of 100] on like they are some kind of special edition prints (Berkely 1962, New York can be made out underneath the prints and the numbers in a tiny font, but googling that gives me no clue as to where these originated).
I've seen the Magritte in the flesh too, and is a better painting than a print. As a print it is overwhelmingly twee looking, whereas the painting had a subtlety and a power to it that can't be described adequately.
I wonder what they have spent on these prints. I can't help thinking that spending a little bit of money on unknown artists might be more interesting. There was a partner in my firm who did this in the 80s and he only bloody went and backed pretty much every one of the YBAs.
I've seen some stuff by a young artist recently in the £600-£1000 mark which I am sure will go up in value when she's had her first solo exhibition in October, upon returning from her current travels in India. I wish I had the money to back this inkling, as I really think it will be worth at least double in 12 months.
If anyone fancies having a punt on this stuff to re-sell in 12 months, I'll insure 100% of any loss in value in return for a 50% share of any uplift!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
^ You see I have a bit of a problem with that insofar as I've considered 'investing' in fine art before, and indeed I've gone and bought a few pieces. The trouble is I'll only consider buying what I absolutely adore, and having coveted the objects I can no longer part with them once acquired than I could consider chopping off my foot. So, then, at that point they no longer become investments, indeed they then become a big drain on what would have been savings.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Yes, I do wonder whether that might happen to me too.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:^ You see I have a bit of a problem with that insofar as I've considered 'investing' in fine art before, and indeed I've gone and bought a few pieces. The trouble is I'll only consider buying what I absolutely adore, and having coveted the objects I can no longer part with them once acquired than I could consider chopping off my foot. So, then, at that point they no longer become investments, indeed they then become a big drain on what would have been savings.
How much have you spent when you've bought, out of interest?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'm not sure exactly. I spent C$1,200 and C$760 on two inuit 'dancing' bear carvings by modern day carvers from the art collectives on Baffin Island. They are promoted as collectibles and art investments by the Canadian government and I adore them. Off the top of my head I know that one of the artists is Abe Simionie, and I can't remember the name of the other (something like Johnny Papaigotok, I can find out). I think they were something in the region of £700 and £500 when I bought them - no idea what they are worth now.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yes, I do wonder whether that might happen to me too.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:^ You see I have a bit of a problem with that insofar as I've considered 'investing' in fine art before, and indeed I've gone and bought a few pieces. The trouble is I'll only consider buying what I absolutely adore, and having coveted the objects I can no longer part with them once acquired than I could consider chopping off my foot. So, then, at that point they no longer become investments, indeed they then become a big drain on what would have been savings.
How much have you spent when you've bought, out of interest?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
If it's the same as this picture it's a nice object. http://www.sunspirit.ca/artistASimionie.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I'm not sure exactly. I spent C$1,200 and C$760 on two inuit 'dancing' bear carvings by modern day carvers from the art collectives on Baffin Island. They are promoted as collectibles and art investments by the Canadian government and I adore them. Off the top of my head I know that one of the artists is Abe Simionie, and I can't remember the name of the other (something like Johnny Papaigotok, I can find out). I think they were something in the region of £700 and £500 when I bought them - no idea what they are worth now.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yes, I do wonder whether that might happen to me too.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:^ You see I have a bit of a problem with that insofar as I've considered 'investing' in fine art before, and indeed I've gone and bought a few pieces. The trouble is I'll only consider buying what I absolutely adore, and having coveted the objects I can no longer part with them once acquired than I could consider chopping off my foot. So, then, at that point they no longer become investments, indeed they then become a big drain on what would have been savings.
How much have you spent when you've bought, out of interest?
Were you thinking in terms of a financial investment when you bought them?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Wow, I'd be able to tell that was a Simionie just from the photo. They are much nicer objects in the flesh, very tactile, but the stone has a translucency not captured by photography.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:If it's the same as this picture it's a nice object. http://www.sunspirit.ca/artistASimionie.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I'm not sure exactly. I spent C$1,200 and C$760 on two inuit 'dancing' bear carvings by modern day carvers from the art collectives on Baffin Island. They are promoted as collectibles and art investments by the Canadian government and I adore them. Off the top of my head I know that one of the artists is Abe Simionie, and I can't remember the name of the other (something like Johnny Papaigotok, I can find out). I think they were something in the region of £700 and £500 when I bought them - no idea what they are worth now.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yes, I do wonder whether that might happen to me too.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:^ You see I have a bit of a problem with that insofar as I've considered 'investing' in fine art before, and indeed I've gone and bought a few pieces. The trouble is I'll only consider buying what I absolutely adore, and having coveted the objects I can no longer part with them once acquired than I could consider chopping off my foot. So, then, at that point they no longer become investments, indeed they then become a big drain on what would have been savings.
How much have you spent when you've bought, out of interest?
Were you thinking in terms of a financial investment when you bought them?
I'm not sure whether I bought them as an investment although that was the justification I gave to my wife. I first saw inuit carvings in a very swanky shop in Chateau Lake Louise and both my missus and I were overwhelmed by them. I then got doubly overwhelmed when I saw the price of them, but I couldn't get them out of my mind, and I bought the first one at the end that holiday as part souvenier, part investment and part as the start of a collection. I bought the second one on a trip back to the Canadian wilderness after I deliberately went out of my way to Cape Dorset - I can't honestly say that that was an investment; it was sheer covetousness.
I've got a photo I took for insurance somewhere, I'll have a quick search.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
here you go (a pretty crap photo of them mind)...


That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I then went on to buy this at auction...
(heritage Canadian inuit art c.1880-1900, artist unknown, carved from Walrus ivory)

(heritage Canadian inuit art c.1880-1900, artist unknown, carved from Walrus ivory)

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
and I've got a couple of inuit carved whale teeth too. So I've got a mini Inuit museum and art gallery.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I knew it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:and I've got a couple of inuit carved whale teeth too. So I've got a mini Inuit museum and art gallery.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
TANGODANCER wrote:I knew it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:and I've got a couple of inuit carved whale teeth too. So I've got a mini Inuit museum and art gallery.

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Think about it...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:TANGODANCER wrote:I knew it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:and I've got a couple of inuit carved whale teeth too. So I've got a mini Inuit museum and art gallery.what? wha' you know?

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
the teeth you mean?TANGODANCER wrote:Think about it...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:TANGODANCER wrote:I knew it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:and I've got a couple of inuit carved whale teeth too. So I've got a mini Inuit museum and art gallery.what? wha' you know?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests