The Great Art Debate

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon May 13, 2013 8:17 am

A Banksy up for auction. Which beggars at least three questions?
How does anybody know it is (a Banksy)?
Does it not lose its graffito status after being jackhammered out of a wall?
Why would anybody want to 'own' it?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by bobo the clown » Mon May 13, 2013 8:42 am

William the White wrote:I have to confess - I pretty much hate what he does, pretty much the same, once, then again, and then for the thousandth time - and, i admit - with skill and boldness - and imagination - and cleverness - but so little else...

Hey, I guess, how much more are you entitled to ask for?

not much, I suppose... but, I would like...

A heart... an emotional centre... a curiosity... a dynamic... a future... a transcendence... a possibility of change... an uncertainty... a movement... a fluidity...
..... and the same political views as you maybe ??
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

clapton is god
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Worryingly close to Old Tr*fford.
Contact:

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by clapton is god » Mon May 13, 2013 8:45 am

bobo the clown wrote:
William the White wrote:I have to confess - I pretty much hate what he does, pretty much the same, once, then again, and then for the thousandth time - and, i admit - with skill and boldness - and imagination - and cleverness - but so little else...

Hey, I guess, how much more are you entitled to ask for?

not much, I suppose... but, I would like...

A heart... an emotional centre... a curiosity... a dynamic... a future... a transcendence... a possibility of change... an uncertainty... a movement... a fluidity...
..... and the same political views as you maybe ??
And near fanatical devotion to the Pope?

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Mon May 13, 2013 12:29 pm

William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
William the White wrote:Tomorrow, on that essential channel, BBC4 at 9.00pm Great Artists in their Own Words offers glimpses into the ideas of Dali, Magritte, Matisse and others. Guardian recommends as one of their picks of the day.
I liked Man Ray best... some fairly mystifying detours (L S Lowry, even though I genuinely like him, is hardly a turning point in 20th Century Art - perhaps simply a semi colon in proletarian realism - as in, without the politics). But will stick. Dali was such a wanker - heartless, money-grubbing prick.

Worth catching I reckon, and maybe worth sticking with.
Thanks Will - I'm in tonight so will iPlayer it.

I enjoyed the Turner programme. It's funny, because we look at Turner's paintings of steam trains and steam tugboats and they can't help but look quaintly nostalgic, but back then they were of course the brash images of modernity.

As for Dali... I think he was guilty of all of those things as well as being a sexual deviant. He was, however, a great painter - the "last of the old masters", as Brian Sewell has it.
I admire Dali's work without ever truly liking it. It seems so self satisfied, such deliberate artifice. No idea what Sewell means by that - care to develop the point? Either Sewell's argument or your support of it?
I will dig out the context in Sewell's autobiography tonight.

I take it to mean simply that he was one of the last painters to handle paint and depict light in that 'painterly' tradition of the old masters.

I have seen a few Dali paintings sell in the past year (none of them particularly famous) and one thing that has struck me is that whatever the subject matter is, they are all skillfully and sensitively painted.

I can't think of many big figures in art since Dali who belong to the tradition of old master painterliness. Can you?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by William the White » Mon May 13, 2013 1:54 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
William the White wrote:I have to confess - I pretty much hate what he does, pretty much the same, once, then again, and then for the thousandth time - and, i admit - with skill and boldness - and imagination - and cleverness - but so little else...

Hey, I guess, how much more are you entitled to ask for?

not much, I suppose... but, I would like...

A heart... an emotional centre... a curiosity... a dynamic... a future... a transcendence... a possibility of change... an uncertainty... a movement... a fluidity...
..... and the same political views as you maybe ??
Obviously it would be nice if an artist you admired shared your political views - but I like and defend Tracey Emin, you may recall, and she votes conservative. Whereas I don't. Did you know?

Dali was a strong supporter of General Franco, it's true, but that isn't why his art doesn't work for me.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon May 13, 2013 1:58 pm

William the White wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
William the White wrote:I have to confess - I pretty much hate what he does, pretty much the same, once, then again, and then for the thousandth time - and, i admit - with skill and boldness - and imagination - and cleverness - but so little else...

Hey, I guess, how much more are you entitled to ask for?

not much, I suppose... but, I would like...

A heart... an emotional centre... a curiosity... a dynamic... a future... a transcendence... a possibility of change... an uncertainty... a movement... a fluidity...
..... and the same political views as you maybe ??
Obviously it would be nice if an artist you admired shared your political views - but I like and defend Tracey Emin, you may recall, and she votes conservative. Whereas I don't. Did you know?

Dali was a strong supporter of General Franco, it's true, but that isn't why his art doesn't work for me.
Was he?
I thought he self-exiled to France during the Franco years, and I'm sure that the Dadaists (whom Dali counted himself as one) had a very strong International Socialist ethos.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon May 13, 2013 2:39 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
William the White wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
William the White wrote:I have to confess - I pretty much hate what he does, pretty much the same, once, then again, and then for the thousandth time - and, i admit - with skill and boldness - and imagination - and cleverness - but so little else...

Hey, I guess, how much more are you entitled to ask for?

not much, I suppose... but, I would like...

A heart... an emotional centre... a curiosity... a dynamic... a future... a transcendence... a possibility of change... an uncertainty... a movement... a fluidity...
..... and the same political views as you maybe ??
Obviously it would be nice if an artist you admired shared your political views - but I like and defend Tracey Emin, you may recall, and she votes conservative. Whereas I don't. Did you know?

Dali was a strong supporter of General Franco, it's true, but that isn't why his art doesn't work for me.
Was he?
I thought he self-exiled to France during the Franco years, and I'm sure that the Dadaists (whom Dali counted himself as one) had a very strong International Socialist ethos.
No need to reply, I've just read up on it and I see he went back to Spain in 1949... and accepted Franco. Ok.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Bruce Rioja » Mon May 13, 2013 3:00 pm

Can the mods put one of those things on like they did for kitchens so that every time William mentions Tracey Emin it pops up as 'The Emperor's New Outfit' instead please? :)
May the bridges I burn light your way

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Mon May 13, 2013 3:03 pm

LLS - seeing as you are good at fact-checking...

I have a theory that this painting by Turner must have its fictional coastline inspired by the three 'faraglioni' of Capri.

http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/william ... 1829#close" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.capri.com/en/s/the-faraglioni-of-capri" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Any thoughts? Do you know of anywhere with a similar rock formation that Turner could have seen?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon May 13, 2013 3:04 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Can the mods put one of those things on like they did for Blackburn so that every time William mentions Tracey Emin it pops up as 'The Emperor's New Outfit' instead please? :)
Is William the White one of the names embroidered onto her tent?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon May 13, 2013 3:24 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:LLS - seeing as you are good at fact-checking...

I have a theory that this painting by Turner must have its fictional coastline inspired by the three 'faraglioni' of Capri.

http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/william ... 1829#close" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.capri.com/en/s/the-faraglioni-of-capri" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Any thoughts? Do you know of anywhere with a similar rock formation that Turner could have seen?
It seems to me that Turner's rock have holes through them, unlike Capri. There are many such formation. For example:

Image

There are also the apostles off Victoria's coast (Oz), and doubtless some in the UK.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Mon May 13, 2013 3:36 pm

One of the Capri rocks does have such a hole.

And he painted that just after a trip to Italy.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon May 13, 2013 3:38 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:One of the Capri rocks does have such a hole.

And he painted that just after a trip to Italy.
Well, then your theory is tenable although I thought he had been sketching out the concept for several years.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Mon May 13, 2013 3:38 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:One of the Capri rocks does have such a hole.

And he painted that just after a trip to Italy.
Well, then your theory is tenable although I thought he had been sketching out the concept for several years.
Interesting - where have you got this from?
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon May 13, 2013 3:41 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:One of the Capri rocks does have such a hole.

And he painted that just after a trip to Italy.
Well, then your theory is tenable although I thought he had been sketching out the concept for several years.
Interesting - where have you got this from?
Hang on, I'll have to do a little research - may take a while....
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon May 13, 2013 3:46 pm

Okay. The painting is generally dated 1829. The National Gallery states:
Ulysses is standing aloft on his ship deriding the Cyclops, whom he and his companions have just left blinded, and invoking the vengeance of Neptune. One of the flags is painted with the scene of the Trojan Horse. The horses of the Sun are rising above the horizon ('Odyssey', Book 9).

Apparently the idea was in Turner's mind as early as about 1807, if this is the correct date of a sketchbook which contains a rough drawing of the subject. The picture was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1829.
Meanwhile [url=http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/tur ... mus-n02958] the Tate[/url shows earlier sketches stating
This is one of seven oil sketches originally on one long roll of canvas, which Turner is usually thought to have painted in Rome in 1828, though he may have worked on them earlier. Tack holes round the edges show that Turner attached them to a temporary support, such as a board, while working. These sketches set out classical compositions in the manner of Claude Lorrain. This design was used for his picture Ulysses deriding Polyphemus, exhibited in 1829 (now in the National Gallery) which shows the escaping hero of Homer's Odyssey taunting the one-eyed giant, Polyphemus.
Last edited by Montreal Wanderer on Mon May 13, 2013 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Mon May 13, 2013 3:47 pm

Just to add that there is a similar formation on the coast at Piombino... I will do some digging too.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 14, 2013 8:12 am

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:
William the White wrote:Tomorrow, on that essential channel, BBC4 at 9.00pm Great Artists in their Own Words offers glimpses into the ideas of Dali, Magritte, Matisse and others. Guardian recommends as one of their picks of the day.
I liked Man Ray best... some fairly mystifying detours (L S Lowry, even though I genuinely like him, is hardly a turning point in 20th Century Art - perhaps simply a semi colon in proletarian realism - as in, without the politics). But will stick. Dali was such a wanker - heartless, money-grubbing prick.

Worth catching I reckon, and maybe worth sticking with.
Thanks Will - I'm in tonight so will iPlayer it.

I enjoyed the Turner programme. It's funny, because we look at Turner's paintings of steam trains and steam tugboats and they can't help but look quaintly nostalgic, but back then they were of course the brash images of modernity.

As for Dali... I think he was guilty of all of those things as well as being a sexual deviant. He was, however, a great painter - the "last of the old masters", as Brian Sewell has it.
I admire Dali's work without ever truly liking it. It seems so self satisfied, such deliberate artifice. No idea what Sewell means by that - care to develop the point? Either Sewell's argument or your support of it?
I will dig out the context in Sewell's autobiography tonight.

I take it to mean simply that he was one of the last painters to handle paint and depict light in that 'painterly' tradition of the old masters.

I have seen a few Dali paintings sell in the past year (none of them particularly famous) and one thing that has struck me is that whatever the subject matter is, they are all skillfully and sensitively painted.

I can't think of many big figures in art since Dali who belong to the tradition of old master painterliness. Can you?
I have checked and Sewell doesn't develop the point at all. And the actual quote is "last of the great old masters".

Perhaps the fact that is an interesting claim is why I (nearly) remembered it.

Anyway, that chapter in the book is all about Sewell's personal 'friendship' with Dali, if that can be the right word for so odd a human being, Exactly the same material can be found in a TV programme BS made, 'Dirty Dali', which can be found in full on You Tube, if you are at all interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NYQ6LCe2Mg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

User avatar
Lost Leopard Spot
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 18436
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by Lost Leopard Spot » Tue May 14, 2013 9:15 am

Hang on Mummy... I'm getting there. The preliminary answer would be No. It ain't a scene painted at Capri. I will reveal more in a bit...
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Re: The Great Art Debate

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Tue May 14, 2013 9:33 am

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Hang on Mummy... I'm getting there. The preliminary answer would be No. It ain't a scene painted at Capri. I will reveal more in a bit...
Ah, balls.

Though you have worded that quite carefully - the scene could be inspired by Capri without being painted at Capri.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin and 13 guests