The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
No, I'll definitely be in Capri from Thursday on, but it's difficult to say if/when I'll be in Gracie Fields' bathing establishment.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
I hope you enjoy it mummy; my in laws went a few years ago, say it was truly stunning.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Right, LLS, I promise this is the last time I will detain you with this.
Oh so altruistically, I decided to buy a book - Turner In Italy - as a gift for the son from the family in Capri (who are accommodating us in their guesthouse http://www.anticomonasteroanacapri.com/ ... x_eng.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at a significant discount for 6 nights from tomorrow) with whom I was discussing this.
I now think that it was really quite likely that Turner saw the Faraglioni when he was in Italy. I now know for certain that he arrived in Naples on 16 October 1819 and left there less than 3 weeks later to head back to Rome on 4 November. Crucially in that time he had visited Paestum from Naples, and made the return journey by sea, meaning one way or another he would have passed the south eastern tip of Capri (where the Faraglioni are) in a boat.
Oh so altruistically, I decided to buy a book - Turner In Italy - as a gift for the son from the family in Capri (who are accommodating us in their guesthouse http://www.anticomonasteroanacapri.com/ ... x_eng.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at a significant discount for 6 nights from tomorrow) with whom I was discussing this.
I now think that it was really quite likely that Turner saw the Faraglioni when he was in Italy. I now know for certain that he arrived in Naples on 16 October 1819 and left there less than 3 weeks later to head back to Rome on 4 November. Crucially in that time he had visited Paestum from Naples, and made the return journey by sea, meaning one way or another he would have passed the south eastern tip of Capri (where the Faraglioni are) in a boat.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Ok, I shall look into what we said, but it will be tomorrow at earliest as I'm presently de-icing my dog, my wife and myself.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Right, LLS, I promise this is the last time I will detain you with this.
Oh so altruistically, I decided to buy a book - Turner In Italy - as a gift for the son from the family in Capri (who are accommodating us in their guesthouse http://www.anticomonasteroanacapri.com/ ... x_eng.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at a significant discount for 6 nights from tomorrow) with whom I was discussing this.
I now think that it was really quite likely that Turner saw the Faraglioni when he was in Italy. I now know for certain that he arrived in Naples on 16 October 1819 and left there less than 3 weeks later to head back to Rome on 4 November. Crucially in that time he had visited Paestum from Naples, and made the return journey by sea, meaning one way or another he would have passed the south eastern tip of Capri (where the Faraglioni are) in a boat.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Now that it is confirmed he was there at the Faraglioni I can amend my summary and conclusion thus:
SUMMARY
1807 Turner conceived of painting Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus
1819 Turner visited Italy and saw the Faraglioni
1827-1828 Turner did a series of oil sketches on four canvas rolls: two on the Isle of Wight, and Two in Rome. There was a sketch of sea stacks similar to Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus in the first IoW roll. The first painting on the first Roman roll was a sketch of Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus. (Turner never painted on rolls again).
1829 Turner painted Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus. It was exhibited later that year at the RA.
CONCLUSION
It would appear that the sketch of Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus from its position on the roll was the first sketch that Turner did in Rome. As his route can be traced coming in from the north it is very unlikely that he revisited Capri again(quite a distance to the south of Rome). It would furthermore appear that he had the idea for a painting with sea stacks from his visit to the Isle of Wight the year before, although the sketches he did there were idealised versions of seastacks and not actual representations of the Needles. It is probable that his visit to the Faraglioni at Capri some nine years previously had made a powerful impression on him, and influenced, when in Rome, the ‘Italianising’ of his more recent sketch of the Needles. As his sketch of Ulysses was not available to him when painting the actual canvas back in Blighty, but his Isle of Wight sketch roll was, the final canvas was probably derived from his memory of one sketch supplemented by the actual IoW sketch in front of him (especially if the IoW sketch was the inspiration for the Italian sketch) all based on his initial impression of his visit to Faraglioni.
The IoW sketch was the direct result of specific experiences even if not actually painted on the spot, whereas the Italian sketches and paintings, and not just the Polythemus, are essays in composition executed in a Roman studio using inspirations from the surrounding countryside but relying more on memory than direct observation.
As one author put it “Turner’s visit to Rome in 1828-9 produced [a] generally more imaginative… increasingly diffuse, atmospherically-focused style… his vision was becoming more assimilated and likely to be expressed in future through memory or imaginative synthesis”
I conclude that his seascape rocks in Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus are an imaginative Italianised rendering of the Needles influenced by a his memory of a visit to the Faraglioni some ten years prior to his sketches on the Isle of Wight.
SUMMARY
1807 Turner conceived of painting Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus
1819 Turner visited Italy and saw the Faraglioni
1827-1828 Turner did a series of oil sketches on four canvas rolls: two on the Isle of Wight, and Two in Rome. There was a sketch of sea stacks similar to Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus in the first IoW roll. The first painting on the first Roman roll was a sketch of Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus. (Turner never painted on rolls again).
1829 Turner painted Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus. It was exhibited later that year at the RA.
CONCLUSION
It would appear that the sketch of Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus from its position on the roll was the first sketch that Turner did in Rome. As his route can be traced coming in from the north it is very unlikely that he revisited Capri again(quite a distance to the south of Rome). It would furthermore appear that he had the idea for a painting with sea stacks from his visit to the Isle of Wight the year before, although the sketches he did there were idealised versions of seastacks and not actual representations of the Needles. It is probable that his visit to the Faraglioni at Capri some nine years previously had made a powerful impression on him, and influenced, when in Rome, the ‘Italianising’ of his more recent sketch of the Needles. As his sketch of Ulysses was not available to him when painting the actual canvas back in Blighty, but his Isle of Wight sketch roll was, the final canvas was probably derived from his memory of one sketch supplemented by the actual IoW sketch in front of him (especially if the IoW sketch was the inspiration for the Italian sketch) all based on his initial impression of his visit to Faraglioni.
The IoW sketch was the direct result of specific experiences even if not actually painted on the spot, whereas the Italian sketches and paintings, and not just the Polythemus, are essays in composition executed in a Roman studio using inspirations from the surrounding countryside but relying more on memory than direct observation.
As one author put it “Turner’s visit to Rome in 1828-9 produced [a] generally more imaginative… increasingly diffuse, atmospherically-focused style… his vision was becoming more assimilated and likely to be expressed in future through memory or imaginative synthesis”
I conclude that his seascape rocks in Ulysses Deriding Polyphemus are an imaginative Italianised rendering of the Needles influenced by a his memory of a visit to the Faraglioni some ten years prior to his sketches on the Isle of Wight.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
- Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent
Re: The Great Art Debate
Sure thats actually Durdle Door, just up from Lulworth cove, nice bit of coastline all around there and would happily move there tomorrow
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!
Re: The Great Art Debate
indeed it is... toured that whole area (jurassic coast?) a few years ago on holiday - lovely!Raven wrote:Sure thats actually Durdle Door, just up from Lulworth cove, nice bit of coastline all around there and would happily move there tomorrow
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Just brilliant - I do have a bit of a shrug, like, 'so what?'... But as craft... mind blowing...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
I agree... though I suppose it is another reminder of the 'treachery of images'... and we forget often enough to need reminding.William the White wrote:Just brilliant - I do have a bit of a shrug, like, 'so what?'... But as craft... mind blowing...
I wonder what his methods are. The mastery of perspective is incredible but does he take a calculated, mathematical approach, or is it all by eye?
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Don't know about him in particular, but I know one of the pavement artists who do the 3D drawings of caverns etc on the streets of London, and his is just natural talent all drawn by eye, no measurements or math techniques, he just draws.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I agree... though I suppose it is another reminder of the 'treachery of images'... and we forget often enough to need.William the White wrote:Just brilliant - I do have a bit of a shrug, like, 'so what?'... But as craft... mind blowing...
I wonder what his methods are. The mastery of perspective is incredible but does he take a calculated, mathematical approach, or is it all by eye?
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Lots of artistic highlights from my recent travels in Campania.
I saw two of the three Caravaggios in Naples, lots of other Rennaissance and Neopolitan paintings and some terrific classic sculpture, mosaics and frescoes...
But I think the one thing that sticks out in my mind as being geuinely unlike anything I have ever seen elsewhere on my travels is the 'Cristo Velato' (Veiled Christ), produced by Giuseppe Sanmartino in 1753 at the age of 33.




An haunting vision, even for a devout atheist like me, executed very sensitively and with a lot of skill.
It might also be the most astonishing example of an artistic one hit wonder I have ever seen. As far as I am a aware, Sanmartino produced nothing else of note.
I saw two of the three Caravaggios in Naples, lots of other Rennaissance and Neopolitan paintings and some terrific classic sculpture, mosaics and frescoes...
But I think the one thing that sticks out in my mind as being geuinely unlike anything I have ever seen elsewhere on my travels is the 'Cristo Velato' (Veiled Christ), produced by Giuseppe Sanmartino in 1753 at the age of 33.




An haunting vision, even for a devout atheist like me, executed very sensitively and with a lot of skill.
It might also be the most astonishing example of an artistic one hit wonder I have ever seen. As far as I am a aware, Sanmartino produced nothing else of note.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Miro's Ballerina II:



- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
I can guess Tango's view of same.William the White wrote:I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Miro's Ballerina II:
![]()
![]()
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Pretty similar to mine I assume. Meh.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I can guess Tango's view of same.William the White wrote:I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Miro's Ballerina II:
![]()
![]()
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Delighted to have put you in touch with something you like (if I am indeed responsible...).William the White wrote: I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.
![]()
![]()
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
You are indeed.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Delighted to have put you in touch with something you like (if I am indeed responsible...).William the White wrote: I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.
![]()
![]()
I'm a Miro fan, but didn't know that one. We have a print of the piece he did for Amnesty on our living room wall; this will sit nicely beside it. I think it's joyful. The Amnesty piece is disturbing. The combination works for me.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
What's the thing dangling out of her ass ??Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Pretty similar to mine I assume. Meh.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I can guess Tango's view of same.William the White wrote:I liked that so much that I told my wife I'd like a print of it. I have it on good authority that a framed print may be arriving just in time for my birthday in a few days time.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Miro's Ballerina II:
![]()
![]()
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests