The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: The Great Art Debate
William the White wrote:I'm at a loss on that question, thebish. I don't know from where it's coming...thebish wrote:is she called Nina? or Angelina?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon?
Enlighten?
Nina - pretty ballerina - Abba song (1973) - a "pop song" I believe they call it
Angelina Ballerina - a fictional mouse-ballerina from a set of children's books in the early 1980s - later a set of comics and a tv show, I believe..
you really should expand your cultural horizons!!

Re: The Great Art Debate
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Miro leads and it takes 90 years for nature to (fail to) catch up...
Another victory for art...

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
So where do we all stand on Lowry?
We have an exhibition on in London at the moment that I haven't yet had chance to visit.
The great Brian is not a fan: http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/exhi ... 87142.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Personally I think there is a kinship with Bruegel and I am not much exercised by whether Lowry was actually influenced by seeing pictures by Bruegel or came up with his cinematic viewpoint all on his own.
Sure, he's possibly over-venerated in some quarters, but I don't feel the need to push back against that as hard as Sewell does.
Though I do understand the charge that Lowry pictures are repetitive. I feel the same in a room full of Canalettos - that distinctive light it so consistent and unchanging that I quickly lose interest. I think the story of British and European art of the 20th century needs at least one pciture by Lowry... but I wouldn't be rushing to include many more.
We have an exhibition on in London at the moment that I haven't yet had chance to visit.
The great Brian is not a fan: http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/exhi ... 87142.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Personally I think there is a kinship with Bruegel and I am not much exercised by whether Lowry was actually influenced by seeing pictures by Bruegel or came up with his cinematic viewpoint all on his own.
Sure, he's possibly over-venerated in some quarters, but I don't feel the need to push back against that as hard as Sewell does.
Though I do understand the charge that Lowry pictures are repetitive. I feel the same in a room full of Canalettos - that distinctive light it so consistent and unchanging that I quickly lose interest. I think the story of British and European art of the 20th century needs at least one pciture by Lowry... but I wouldn't be rushing to include many more.
Last edited by mummywhycantieatcrayons on Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I'm a fan.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
He shows a world that needed showing, with truth, heart and humour.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Lowry is sort of a historian artist who recorded the industrial and local every-day life aspects of his own era. Minute detail wasn't his thing in the strict sense, recording what he saw was, in a simple impressionist sort of way. In what he did he was good, a lthough I imagine local stuff - as in "Going to the match" - was a factor in his fan appeal.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
i've always liked lowry - but then i've always liked grim-looking industrial landscapes in art...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
i think you're right that several rooms full would soon lead to a drop-off in impact... but I've never viewed several rooms full - so that's a guess - i'd be interested to hear if that turns out to be the case..
after a while - he looks a bit like the grim-up-north version of where's wally!

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
The permanent exhibition in Salford shows a greater variety than the usual 'matchstalk men' we always see. Also, as is often the case, they are far better in real time than photo images allow for.thebish wrote:i've always liked lowry - but then i've always liked grim-looking industrial landscapes in art...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
i think you're right that several rooms full would soon lead to a drop-off in impact... but I've never viewed several rooms full - so that's a guess - i'd be interested to hear if that turns out to be the case..
after a while - he looks a bit like the grim-up-north version of where's wally!
That said, I do tend to the 'Where's Wally' view more than the English Bruegel .... then again I'm a massive fan of Flemish art. Not lazy, you see ... fill in all the corners.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I think his stuff is absolutely dreadful. No idea of perspective, linear or otherwise, and shows little vestige of painting talent anywhere. Went to an exhibition of his some years ago at Salford Uni and discovered that he actually got worse with age.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
Take a look at the roofless Lever End on Going To The Match. It's laughable.
Last edited by Bruce Rioja on Fri Jul 05, 2013 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: The Great Art Debate
are you sure it's not a disgrace!!Bruce Rioja wrote:I think his stuff is absolutely dreadful. No idea of perspective, linear or otherwise whatsoever. Went to an exhibition of his some years ago at Salford Uni and discovered that he actually got worse with age.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
Take a look at the roofless Lever End on Going To The Match. It's laughable.

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
It's that toothebish wrote:are you sure it's not a disgrace!!Bruce Rioja wrote:I think his stuff is absolutely dreadful. No idea of perspective, linear or otherwise whatsoever. Went to an exhibition of his some years ago at Salford Uni and discovered that he actually got worse with age.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:So where do we all stand on Lowry?
Take a look at the roofless Lever End on Going To The Match. It's laughable.

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: The Great Art Debate
I think he knew what he was doing... I have always liked his self-portrait..


-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: The Great Art Debate
That looks nothing like him !thebish wrote:I think he knew what he was doing... I have always liked his self-portrait..

See ... he's miles older than that !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Michael Vaughn's?thebish wrote:I think he knew what he was doing... I have always liked his self-portrait..

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
You know, that is the spitting image of bobo. That's his happy face on a sunny day.thebish wrote:^ that's clearly you Bobo - nice try!
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Mr Darcy in Hyde Park.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23225149" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23225149" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Well the artist certainly hit bulls eye with that one...TANGODANCER wrote:Mr Darcy in Hyde Park.![]()
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23225149" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: The Great Art Debate
Looks like it'd be as good at acting.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
You mean as Firth? I like him. Great in the King's Speech and Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. Did Darrcy very well too, for me. The whole lake scene was a BBC thing and never happened in the book. Try telling that to half-a-million women though.Prufrock wrote:Looks like it'd be as good at acting.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests