General Chit Chat
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9722
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: General Chit Chat
The brand word. The Austen brand is heavily marketed. Makes sense now 

Re: General Chit Chat
so would I - but LLS said i wasn't allowed anyone political!mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It's odd - I'm usually quite staunchly opposed to tokenism, affirmative action and positive discrimination in most of its guises, but I do think that having women as well as men on the instrument of commerce is something I'd quite like any daughter of mine to grow up seeing. I am not so exercised by the coherence of the case for any particular candidate - as I say, it's just about a bit of 'visibility' for me.
If I were looking to grasp the nettle and start a proper discussion about contributions and progress, I'd put Emmeline Pankhurst on.
if the idea is to make women's contribution to British society more visible - then i think it's a missed opportunity to pick one woman who is already pretty visible....
what does she SAY - that women can write books?? that women are interested in love-stories about toffs?
far better - in my opinion - to have gone for a much less visible great - such a scientist - which would prompt a discussion about women being influentially involved in science - a realm where they have been far more ignored and overlooked than literature...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: General Chit Chat
How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of themthebish wrote:so would I - but LLS said i wasn't allowed anyone political!mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:It's odd - I'm usually quite staunchly opposed to tokenism, affirmative action and positive discrimination in most of its guises, but I do think that having women as well as men on the instrument of commerce is something I'd quite like any daughter of mine to grow up seeing. I am not so exercised by the coherence of the case for any particular candidate - as I say, it's just about a bit of 'visibility' for me.
If I were looking to grasp the nettle and start a proper discussion about contributions and progress, I'd put Emmeline Pankhurst on.
if the idea is to make women's contribution to British society more visible - then i think it's a missed opportunity to pick one woman who is already pretty visible....
what does she SAY - that women can write books?? that women are interested in love-stories about toffs?
far better - in my opinion - to have gone for a much less visible great - such a scientist - which would prompt a discussion about women being influentially involved in science - a realm where they have been far more ignored and overlooked than literature...

Re: General Chit Chat
all of this may be so - but - what message does her face on a note present? that women can write books? it's all a bit safe and establishment - an opportunity missed, i think...TANGODANCER wrote:Pride and Prejudice does appear in the top 100 best books of all time, has had at least three films and two major TV series made of it, recently figured in a B.B.C recreation evening and meal and is currently re-showing on the B.B.C Drama series. There have been films of all her books except an unfinished one (Sanditon). Since the internet, e-books etc and also based on book sales,( her works have been in continuous print since 1833) libraries aren't the best judge right now. Jane Austen Societies exist all over the world tours, including a sizeable amount of tourists take place regularly and her home is just as famous as the Bronte Parsonage in Haworth. There is a museum dedicated to her in Bath that has a bigger souvenier line than the Reebok shop and book sales are constantly healthy. They also publish a two-monthy magazine that sells worldwide.thebish wrote:in 2012, Jane Austen didn't appear in the top 50 most borrowed authors from UK libraries - nor did any of her books appear in the top 250 most-borrowed books from UK libraries...
This is a quote from a Radio Times article by Amanda Vickery:
"Today, Austen is a cultural industry with global reach. The Austen brand has outstripped the Brontës, Dickens and Hardy - Austen Inc. may even be more lucrative than Shakespeare."
i suspect the idea was to highlight the fact that significant women have been overlooked in our history... Austen, though, is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked - as you, yourself, point out...
Re: General Chit Chat
interesting that you can't name one!Gooner Girl wrote: How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of them
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: General Chit Chat
I could name plenty, too many to choose from.thebish wrote:interesting that you can't name one!Gooner Girl wrote: How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of them

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34745
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Can't believe this topic has gone on so long without Jordan's name coming up.
Re: General Chit Chat
go on then - your top 3 candidates...Gooner Girl wrote:I could name plenty, too many to choose from.thebish wrote:interesting that you can't name one!Gooner Girl wrote: How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of them
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: General Chit Chat
Which is of course pure assumption as I don't see anyone claiming that anywhere? The Post Office issued a set of Austen stamps a while back. That's hardly overlooking. Have a read of LLS's link to give an indication of how others see Jane Austen. If you think the focus of Pride and Prejudice is just a love story about toffs, I'd suggest a re-read.thebish wrote: i suspect the idea was to highlight the fact that significant women have been overlooked in our history... Austen, though, is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked - as you, yourself, point out...

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: General Chit Chat
Ok, slight athletics bias here but Jessica Ennis, Paula Radcliffe and either Sally Gunnel or Kelly Holmes (can't decide)thebish wrote:go on then - your top 3 candidates...Gooner Girl wrote:I could name plenty, too many to choose from.thebish wrote:interesting that you can't name one!Gooner Girl wrote: How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of them
Re: General Chit Chat
they are all alive!!Gooner Girl wrote:Ok, slight athletics bias here but Jessica Ennis, Paula Radcliffe and either Sally Gunnel or Kelly Holmes (can't decide)thebish wrote:go on then - your top 3 candidates...Gooner Girl wrote:I could name plenty, too many to choose from.thebish wrote:interesting that you can't name one!Gooner Girl wrote: How about one of our female sporting greats?! Ahhh, I forgot, Bish doesn't think we have any of them
Re: General Chit Chat
indeed - I said Austen is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked.TANGODANCER wrote:Which is of course pure assumption as I don't see anyone claiming that anywhere? The Post Office issued a set of Austen stamps a while back. That's hardly overlooking.thebish wrote: i suspect the idea was to highlight the fact that significant women have been overlooked in our history... Austen, though, is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked - as you, yourself, point out...
as I said - in my opinion - an opportunity wasted to give recognition to a significant woman whose contribution to British life HAS been overlooked (I listed some good candidates.)
I can see you differ - but that's OK! chill! but we don't all have to agree with your support of Austen...
enlighten me - apart from being a love story about toffs - what IS Pride & Prejudice?
Re: General Chit Chat
http://eveningharold.com/2013/07/25/fan ... ound-note/Worthy4England wrote:Can't believe this topic has gone on so long without Jordan's name coming up.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: General Chit Chat
Hey, I'm quite chilled ta. I'm not the one doing shout words.thebish wrote:indeed - I said Austen is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked.TANGODANCER wrote:Which is of course pure assumption as I don't see anyone claiming that anywhere? The Post Office issued a set of Austen stamps a while back. That's hardly overlooking.thebish wrote: i suspect the idea was to highlight the fact that significant women have been overlooked in our history... Austen, though, is a woman who HASN'T been overlooked - as you, yourself, point out...
as I said - in my opinion - an opportunity wasted to give recognition to a significant woman whose contribution to British life HAS been overlooked (I listed some good candidates.)
I can see you differ - but that's OK! chill! but we don't all have to agree with your support of Austen...
enlighten me - apart from being a love story about toffs - what IS Pride & Prejudice?


Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: General Chit Chat
For me it just says that women exist and can do stuff.thebish wrote:
what does she SAY - that women can write books?? that women are interested in love-stories about toffs?
Given that there are no hard and fast objective criteria, I can't get too enthused about a discussion of the merits.
Let's just take one of your suggestions because it's timely - Rosalind Franklin. I agree that she'd be a good candidate, but with her presumably we'd be discussing whether she deserves to get the nod over Watson and Crick on merit and achievement alone.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: General Chit Chat
no - i gave her as an example GIVEN the decision to pick a woman... (and I'm not sure such a discussion would ensue - after all - there are no posts on here discussing whether Austen deserves the nod over a male author...)mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:For me it just says that women exist and can do stuff.thebish wrote:
what does she SAY - that women can write books?? that women are interested in love-stories about toffs?
Given that there are no hard and fast objective criteria, I can't get too enthused about a discussion of the merits.
Let's just take one of your suggestions because it's timely - Rosalind Franklin. I agree that she'd be a good candidate, but with her presumably we'd be discussing whether she deserves to get the nod over Watson and Crick on merit and achievement alone.
given they decided to pick a woman - and they specifically wanted her on the £10 note rather than the £5 - then maybe it's not the most important discussion of all time - but surely it's interesting to discuss which woman and why?
anyway - the OTHER side of the note already says women exist and can do stuff (stuff as big as being queen!)
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: General Chit Chat
What a load of fckg horseshit.TANGODANCER wrote:This is a quote from a Radio Times article by Amanda Vickery:
"Today, Austen is a cultural industry with global reach. The Austen brand has outstripped the Brontës, Dickens and Hardy - Austen Inc. may even be more lucrative than Shakespeare."
(I tried various, more considered, ways of saying this, but, honestly, this seemed to win hands down).
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: General Chit Chat
Nothing wrong with a man who speaks his mind.bobo the clown wrote:What a load of fckg horseshit.TANGODANCER wrote:This is a quote from a Radio Times article by Amanda Vickery:
"Today, Austen is a cultural industry with global reach. The Austen brand has outstripped the Brontës, Dickens and Hardy - Austen Inc. may even be more lucrative than Shakespeare."
(I tried various, more considered, ways of saying this, but, honestly, this seemed to win hands down).

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: General Chit Chat
Bitches gonna hate. Haters gonna bitch.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9405
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: General Chit Chat
Grace Darling, Octavia Hill or Enid Blyton for me
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests