creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Last man Nathan Lyon is wearing his armguard on the balcony, so it looks like he's planning to bat.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38850
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Aye unless the weather intervenes big time, I reckon Aus are big favourites here.thebish wrote:i think you seriously underestimate England's capacity to buckle under scoreboard pressure... have we jot been 20-odd for three in just about every innings so far?bwfcdan94 wrote:TBH I thin if Australia play for the rest of the day then they are not going to have time to beat us. Australia are already killing this game IMO.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
all we have to do is bat for a couple of days! On their day - trott, cook, root, pieterson and bell are all capable of batting for hours... BUT...
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
We don't even need to score just defend that's exactly what the England teams of old did, isn't it meant to rain tomorrow anyhow.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
nahhh - bad move to go and and defend for three days - it encourages a siege mentality!! {boycott voice on} just bat sensibly - hit the bad ball, block the rest or let them go by... {boycott voice off}bwfcdan94 wrote:We don't even need to score just defend that's exactly what the England teams of old did, isn't it meant to rain tomorrow anyhow.
remember - they have to WIN it - after a while there will also be some pressure on them...
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
and we're off...
from ye BBC..
from ye BBC..
Cricket is an amazing game. For most of the day, batting has looked easier than making a cup-a-soup, but now, with 527 runs to play with, Australia's bowlers are making the ball talk. Movement from left-armer Mitchell Starc away from Cook. Cook, bat like a sliding door, fences with three slips and a gully waiting to be fed, but there's no edge.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Nowt wrong with a siege mentality when required. My opinion is that if we draw this test match and give it another go at Chester -le Street (which is a nice place in the North east btw) but if we lose our confidence will be shot and Australia's will be high in the sky the result will be that Australia will win at CLS and will probably win at the Oval as well. We need to save the possibility of embarrassment today better to win an ashes series 4-0 then risk losing it 3-2 in an attempt to win it 5-0. I am sure however Bish that having been around and played/umpired/watched a lot more cricket then me will prove you right.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
bwfcdan94 wrote:Nowt wrong with a siege mentality when required. My opinion is that if we draw this test match and give it another go at Chester -le Street (which is a nice place in the North east btw) but if we lose our confidence will be shot and Australia's will be high in the sky the result will be that Australia will win at CLS and will probably win at the Oval as well. We need to save the possibility of embarrassment today better to win an ashes series 4-0 then risk losing it 3-2 in an attempt to win it 5-0. I am sure however Bish that having been around and played/umpired/watched a lot more cricket then me will prove you right.
i am not suggesting we try and win it - just that we don't play too defensively - if you score no runs, the pressure builds - more attacking fields are set and you end up pressuring yourself into defeat... even though they are 500+ runs ahead - the trick is not to let them think they are totally in control... start to knock off the runs bit by bit - and they too will start to look at the scoreboard...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Behave Dan. If it was going to be a whitewash job there'd be no point bothering playing for the Ashes. We won't lose confidence, we're two up already remember? One win or two draws and we keep the Ashes. When it stops being competitive it won't be worth playing.bwfcdan94 wrote:Nowt wrong with a siege mentality when required. My opinion is that if we draw this test match and give it another go at Chester -le Street (which is a nice place in the North east btw) but if we lose our confidence will be shot and Australia's will be high in the sky the result will be that Australia will win at CLS and will probably win at the Oval as well. We need to save the possibility of embarrassment today better to win an ashes series 4-0 then risk losing it 3-2 in an attempt to win it 5-0. I am sure however Bish that having been around and played/umpired/watched a lot more cricket then me will prove you right.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38850
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Bish is right. First target is follow on. Don't just sit there prodding cos that's what they want.thebish wrote:bwfcdan94 wrote:Nowt wrong with a siege mentality when required. My opinion is that if we draw this test match and give it another go at Chester -le Street (which is a nice place in the North east btw) but if we lose our confidence will be shot and Australia's will be high in the sky the result will be that Australia will win at CLS and will probably win at the Oval as well. We need to save the possibility of embarrassment today better to win an ashes series 4-0 then risk losing it 3-2 in an attempt to win it 5-0. I am sure however Bish that having been around and played/umpired/watched a lot more cricket then me will prove you right.
i am not suggesting we try and win it - just that we don't play too defensively - if you score no runs, the pressure builds - more attacking fields are set and you end up pressuring yourself into defeat... even though they are 500+ runs ahead - the trick is not to let them think they are totally in control... start to knock off the runs bit by bit - and they too will start to look at the scoreboard...
Don't be silly either, but runs are still part of this equation.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Just keep it ticking over and play the natural game is what your all saying basically.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
there are several targets before follow-on!BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bish is right. First target is follow on. Don't just sit there prodding cos that's what they want.
Don't be silly either, but runs are still part of this equation.
first target is close of play without losing a wicket!
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I was about to ask if Geoffrey would defend him being from Yuuuurkshire.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38850
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
It was good bowling to be fair.
Remains to be seen but my suspicion is that England didn't bowl all that well, despite the flat pitch.
Warne reckons we bowled a fraction too short.
Remains to be seen but my suspicion is that England didn't bowl all that well, despite the flat pitch.
Warne reckons we bowled a fraction too short.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Had to miss the last hour. What did we finish at?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
52-2 we are in trouble. Defend!
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests