Today I'm angry about.....
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
He has, they're gulls that've hitched a lift on a sea-kayak.thebish wrote:no you don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:We have some seagulls in Montreal (1000 miles inland)Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Seagulls. Inland. One's just shat on my head. Dirty bastard, fxck off back to sea!
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I have been shat on 7 times that I can recall.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
but in Canada it's NOT a sea-kayak!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:He has, they're gulls that've hitched a lift on a sea-kayak.thebish wrote:no you don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:We have some seagulls in Montreal (1000 miles inland)Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Seagulls. Inland. One's just shat on my head. Dirty bastard, fxck off back to sea!

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
The word was good enough for John Milton, Thomas Gray and Charles Dickens. The word is indeed in common parlance so I am not worried about offending zoologically minded pedants.thebish wrote:no you don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:We have some seagulls in Montreal (1000 miles inland)Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Seagulls. Inland. One's just shat on my head. Dirty bastard, fxck off back to sea!
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
you still don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:The word was good enough for John Milton, Thomas Gray and Charles Dickens. The word is indeed in common parlance so I am not worried about offending zoologically minded pedants.thebish wrote:no you don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:We have some seagulls in Montreal (1000 miles inland)Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Seagulls. Inland. One's just shat on my head. Dirty bastard, fxck off back to sea!

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
All a bit like that Union Jack business (though it took an act of parliament to settle that issue).thebish wrote:you still don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:The word was good enough for John Milton, Thomas Gray and Charles Dickens. The word is indeed in common parlance so I am not worried about offending zoologically minded pedants.thebish wrote:no you don't!Montreal Wanderer wrote:We have some seagulls in Montreal (1000 miles inland)Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Seagulls. Inland. One's just shat on my head. Dirty bastard, fxck off back to sea!
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I know from relatively recent experience that seagullshit exists. It came out of a seagull's arse. Do they do exist, I can vouch for it.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
no you can't!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I know from relatively recent experience that seagullshit exists. It came out of a seagull's arse. Do they do exist, I can vouch for it.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Tell me why...thebish wrote:no you can't!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I know from relatively recent experience that seagullshit exists. It came out of a seagull's arse. Do they do exist, I can vouch for it.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Tell me why...thebish wrote:no you can't!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I know from relatively recent experience that seagullshit exists. It came out of a seagull's arse. Do they do exist, I can vouch for it.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
I'm only guessing but I suspect the point the Bish is trying to get across in his own, inimitable way is that....
THERE'S NO SUCH THINK AS A fecking SEAGULL!
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I disagree. Seagulls exist because almost all English speakers know what is meant when the word is used. The fact that they might more properly say gull or some sub-species of same if irrelevant. When Spotty, shat upon from a colossal height, used the term we understood exactly what he meant. He did not perhaps identify the offender with great accuracy (understandable in the circumstances) but his meaning was clear. The same is true when Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens et al use the term - we know what they mean. We know what people mean when they speak of a buffalo even though they are incorrect in the usage - and think how silly he might have felt if he had been called Bison Bill Cody.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
because you recanted your original testimony and declared that the bird concerned was in fact not a seagull but a "gull of the seabird family Laridae, either a Scunthorpe Herring Gull, or a Fat-arsed Laughing Gull"...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Tell me why...thebish wrote:no you can't!Lost Leopard Spot wrote:I know from relatively recent experience that seagullshit exists. It came out of a seagull's arse. Do they do exist, I can vouch for it.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
so you might claim that you can vouch for:
gull of the seabird family Laridae shit
or
Scunthorpe Herring Gull shit
or
Fat-arsed Laughing Gull shit
but not seagull shit.

Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
i don't care. there is no such thing as a seagull. can you show me a picture of one?
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree. Seagulls exist because almost all English speakers know what is meant when the word is used. The fact that they might more properly say gull or some sub-species of same if irrelevant. When Spotty, shat upon from a colossal height, used the term we understood exactly what he meant. He did not perhaps identify the offender with great accuracy (understandable in the circumstances) but his meaning was clear. The same is true when Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens et al use the term - we know what they mean. We know what people mean when they speak of a buffalo even though they are incorrect in the usage - and think how silly he might have felt if he had been called Bison Bill Cody.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
I've read about Unicorns and Centaurs too. If I talk about them people understand what I mean. It still doesn't mean they exist.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree. Seagulls exist because almost all English speakers know what is meant when the word is used. The fact that they might more properly say gull or some sub-species of same if irrelevant. When Spotty, shat upon from a colossal height, used the term we understood exactly what he meant. He did not perhaps identify the offender with great accuracy (understandable in the circumstances) but his meaning was clear. The same is true when Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens et al use the term - we know what they mean. We know what people mean when they speak of a buffalo even though they are incorrect in the usage - and think how silly he might have felt if he had been called Bison Bill Cody.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....

Stupendously well argued, although tbf I have always called him Bison Bill.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
many people talk of the "fine tooth-comb" - that mythical beast of the barber shop. there still is no such thing as the fine tooth-comb, though...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree. Seagulls exist because almost all English speakers know what is meant when the word is used. The fact that they might more properly say gull or some sub-species of same if irrelevant. When Spotty, shat upon from a colossal height, used the term we understood exactly what he meant. He did not perhaps identify the offender with great accuracy (understandable in the circumstances) but his meaning was clear. The same is true when Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens et al use the term - we know what they mean. We know what people mean when they speak of a buffalo even though they are incorrect in the usage - and think how silly he might have felt if he had been called Bison Bill Cody.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....![]()
Stupendously well argued, although tbf I have always called him Bison Bill.
and - while we are on the subject - there is no such thing as a seagull.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
thebish wrote:many people talk of the "fine tooth-comb" - that mythical beast of the barber shop. there still is no such thing as the fine tooth-comb, though...Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree. Seagulls exist because almost all English speakers know what is meant when the word is used. The fact that they might more properly say gull or some sub-species of same if irrelevant. When Spotty, shat upon from a colossal height, used the term we understood exactly what he meant. He did not perhaps identify the offender with great accuracy (understandable in the circumstances) but his meaning was clear. The same is true when Shakespeare, Milton, Dickens et al use the term - we know what they mean. We know what people mean when they speak of a buffalo even though they are incorrect in the usage - and think how silly he might have felt if he had been called Bison Bill Cody.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....![]()
Stupendously well argued, although tbf I have always called him Bison Bill.
and - while we are on the subject - there is no such thing as a seagull.
Nah, I'm off. This shit will go on for days..........
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
thebish wrote:Montreal Wanderer wrote:I disagree.thebish wrote:^ not really. There is no such thing as a seagull....
i don't care. there is no such thing as a seagull. can you show me a picture of one?

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
that's a proper name. and that picture is not a seagull.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests