The Official Strictly Thread.

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 11:40 am

CrazyHorse wrote:Claudia Winkleman has been given the job of replacing Sir Bruce Forsyth on strictly.
BBC entertainment correspondent Lizo Mzimba said "The new Strictly line-up is a clear demonstration of the BBC's determination to feature more women, particularly in its primetime output".
I see the whole thing of announcing something like that as pure Bullshxt worthy of the Emily Pankhurst award for feminism. . I really like Claudia Winkleman from her weekly shows before Zoe Ball took over. I'm absolutely sure she'll do a great job on Strictly because she's intelligent, witty and funny, which this show needs. Give the jobs to the one most suited to do it, (which Claudia undoubtedly qualifies) regardless of sex, age or anything else. As long as they keep making, and highlighting, definitions between the sexes, the longer it will take before real equality occurs. In some things, men and women "are" different and nothing will ever change that fact. Being able to do a job should have f-all to do with "oh look, we're playing fair by allowing a woman to do the job. Well done us". The fact that a woman made the comment just highlights (at least for me) that equality seems to be far more of an issue with women that men. All the TV channels are already absolutely ruled by female presenters, weather girls and show hostesses.....just in case nobody noticed..
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Burnden Paddock
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3736
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Bury

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Burnden Paddock » Sat May 10, 2014 4:53 pm

For the record, Lizo Mzimba is a bloke. :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 5:05 pm

Burnden Paddock wrote:For the record, Lizo Mzimba is a bloke. :wink:
Well, it's his fault for having a name like that anyway..... :evil:

Sorry Lizo..... :oops: The point remains, however.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by thebish » Sat May 10, 2014 5:08 pm

just in case anyone should think that TV channels are already absolutely ruled by female presenters, BBC television and radio, Sky, ITN and Channel 5 combined have just 26 women over 50 working as regular on-air presenters out of a total of 481 presenters.

Overall, women over 50 make up just 5% of on-screen presenters of all ages and both sexes and 7% of the workforce, both on and off screen.

it's a LOT easier for a Brucie to be a presenter than it is for a woman of equivalent age.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 5:16 pm

thebish wrote:just in case anyone should think that TV channels are already absolutely ruled by female presenters, BBC television and radio, Sky, ITN and Channel 5 combined have just 26 women over 50 working as regular on-air presenters out of a total of 481 presenters.

Overall, women over 50 make up just 5% of on-screen presenters of all ages and both sexes and 7% of the workforce, both on and off screen.

it's a LOT easier for a Brucie to be a presenter than it is for a woman of equivalent age.
Well done for finding all that out.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Gary the Enfield » Sat May 10, 2014 9:49 pm

I think they should have a male and female presenter for Strictly. It works well with the male and female contestants.

Always hopeful
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:09 pm
Location: Sat in the back bedroom.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Always hopeful » Sat May 10, 2014 9:59 pm

CrazyHorse wrote:Claudia Winkleman has been given the job of replacing Sir Bruce Forsyth on strictly.
BBC entertainment correspondent Lizo Mzimba said "The new Strictly line-up is a clear demonstration of the BBC's determination to feature more women, particularly in its primetime output".
What? :shock:

She's the most inelegant person ever to have been associated with that show. She clops onto the stage like a pantomime horse. AND whilst her low fringe is probably her 'trademark', get it cut love, it's horrible.

Apart from that, I'm sure she'll do a wonderful job :roll:
Hope is what keeps us going.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 10:07 pm

Always hopeful wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:Claudia Winkleman has been given the job of replacing Sir Bruce Forsyth on strictly.
BBC entertainment correspondent Lizo Mzimba said "The new Strictly line-up is a clear demonstration of the BBC's determination to feature more women, particularly in its primetime output".
What? :shock:

She's the most inelegant person ever to have been associated with that show. She clops onto the stage like a pantomime horse. AND whilst her low fringe is probably her 'trademark', get it cut love, it's horrible.

Apart from that, I'm sure she'll do a wonderful job :roll:
She's whacky, looks like a cross between a throw-back to the sixties and a gothic fancy dress party, and most of her frocks look like coloured bin bags, but she's really likeable for me and I'm delighted they didn't give the job to the gushy Tess Daly, who I really don't like. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Always hopeful
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:09 pm
Location: Sat in the back bedroom.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Always hopeful » Sat May 10, 2014 10:11 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
Always hopeful wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:Claudia Winkleman has been given the job of replacing Sir Bruce Forsyth on strictly.
BBC entertainment correspondent Lizo Mzimba said "The new Strictly line-up is a clear demonstration of the BBC's determination to feature more women, particularly in its primetime output".
What? :shock:

She's the most inelegant person ever to have been associated with that show. She clops onto the stage like a pantomime horse. AND whilst her low fringe is probably her 'trademark', get it cut love, it's horrible.

Apart from that, I'm sure she'll do a wonderful job :roll:
She's whacky, looks like a cross between a throw-back to the sixties and a gothic fancy dress party, and most of her frocks look like coloured bin bags, but she's really likeable for me and I'm delighted they didn't give the job to the gushy Tess Daly, who I really don't like. :wink:
I haven't read anything about this. So, Claudia is replacing Tess, not Brucie? Who's replacing Brucie then? :conf:
Hope is what keeps us going.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 10:17 pm

Always hopeful wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
Always hopeful wrote:
CrazyHorse wrote:Claudia Winkleman has been given the job of replacing Sir Bruce Forsyth on strictly.
BBC entertainment correspondent Lizo Mzimba said "The new Strictly line-up is a clear demonstration of the BBC's determination to feature more women, particularly in its primetime output".
What? :shock:

She's the most inelegant person ever to have been associated with that show. She clops onto the stage like a pantomime horse. AND whilst her low fringe is probably her 'trademark', get it cut love, it's horrible.

Apart from that, I'm sure she'll do a wonderful job :roll:
She's whacky, looks like a cross between a throw-back to the sixties and a gothic fancy dress party, and most of her frocks look like coloured bin bags, but she's really likeable for me and I'm delighted they didn't give the job to the gushy Tess Daly, who I really don't like. :wink:
I haven't read anything about this. So, Claudia is replacing Tess, not Brucie? Who's replacing Brucie then? :conf:
No, Claudia's replacing Brucie, she's in charge... (probably not to Tess's delight).
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Always hopeful
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:09 pm
Location: Sat in the back bedroom.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Always hopeful » Sat May 10, 2014 10:22 pm

Ah, OK. Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me. Claudia's not up to it IMHO. Oh well, I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
Hope is what keeps us going.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by bobo the clown » Sat May 10, 2014 10:22 pm

^^ He's an engineer. Forgive him.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Always hopeful
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:09 pm
Location: Sat in the back bedroom.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Always hopeful » Sat May 10, 2014 10:25 pm

bobo the clown wrote:^^ He's an engineer. Forgive him.
Engineers have feelings too. :?
Hope is what keeps us going.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 10:28 pm

Claudia was a massive success on It Takes Two, the week night follow up show. She most likely got the job on the strength of her popularity with that. I'm looking forward to Strictly starting again.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24863
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Prufrock » Sat May 10, 2014 10:42 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
thebish wrote:just in case anyone should think that TV channels are already absolutely ruled by female presenters, BBC television and radio, Sky, ITN and Channel 5 combined have just 26 women over 50 working as regular on-air presenters out of a total of 481 presenters.

Overall, women over 50 make up just 5% of on-screen presenters of all ages and both sexes and 7% of the workforce, both on and off screen.

it's a LOT easier for a Brucie to be a presenter than it is for a woman of equivalent age.
Well done for finding all that out.
:lol: yeah! With your facts!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 11:27 pm

What on earth have these two done with their mouths?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... otion.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by bobo the clown » Sat May 10, 2014 11:35 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:What on earth have these two done with their mouths?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... otion.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
They look like Heath Ledger's Joker.


I do think it's just liner rather than surgery or injections though.

.... though why is Tess Daly's left eye an inch lower than her right ??
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat May 10, 2014 11:56 pm

Prufrock wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
thebish wrote:just in case anyone should think that TV channels are already absolutely ruled by female presenters, BBC television and radio, Sky, ITN and Channel 5 combined have just 26 women over 50 working as regular on-air presenters out of a total of 481 presenters.

Overall, women over 50 make up just 5% of on-screen presenters of all ages and both sexes and 7% of the workforce, both on and off screen.

it's a LOT easier for a Brucie to be a presenter than it is for a woman of equivalent age.
Well done for finding all that out.
:lol: yeah! With your facts!
Ah well, see I don't remember Claudia Winklemen (who we were talking about) being over fifty, and my wife watches a lot of morning TV where there seem to be an awful lot of females in the chairs, like Lorraine Kelly, Kate Garraway, that Susanna bird and the cast of Loose Women and all those women that pop up waving their arms at maps and pointing to Wales whilst talking about Scarboro etc. Then again, we were also taking about the B.B.C and its self-serving "didn't we do well" attitude over employing women...but hey, ho.... :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24863
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by Prufrock » Mon May 12, 2014 10:37 am

Weather girls, Loose Women and 'that Susanna bird'. Outstanding.

I've no argument with,

"In some things, men and women "are" different and nothing will ever change that fact. Being able to do a job should have f-all to do with "oh look, we're playing fair by allowing a woman to do the job. Well done us"."

but the point is clearly people aren't being chosen by whether or not they can do the job; and, clearly TV presenting isn't something that one sex are going to be intrinsically better at. That women suddenly get dropped when they hit fifty probably suggests that the 'assets' women are being judged on aren't their abilities to present *ifyouknowwhatimean*.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44181
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Official Strictly Thread.

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon May 12, 2014 11:43 am

Prufrock wrote:Weather girls, Loose Women and 'that Susanna bird'. Outstanding.

I've no argument with,

"In some things, men and women "are" different and nothing will ever change that fact. Being able to do a job should have f-all to do with "oh look, we're playing fair by allowing a woman to do the job. Well done us"."

but the point is clearly people aren't being chosen by whether or not they can do the job; and, clearly TV presenting isn't something that one sex are going to be intrinsically better at. That women suddenly get dropped when they hit fifty probably suggests that the 'assets' women are being judged on aren't their abilities to present *ifyouknowwhatimean*.
Not sure exactly what you do have an argument with to be honest, apart from sniggering away in the background? I was/do support sexual equality totally. I have a wife and three daughters and granddaughters and obviously want the best for them. My point was about the B.B.C seemingly patting themselves on the back for allowing women at the table. Having passed fifty quite some time back I do tend to support older people as not being just fit to sit by the roadside and wait to die. Whether you accept it or not, the real cause always comes back to sex in its most basic sense. If it didn't, and its potential for exploitation and ratings didn't count, your Katy Prices' and all the rest of the "celebrities" wouldn't get house room. Sex rules the world, and T.V companies exist on attracting ratings even if they have bearded men in frocks to do it.....

Things could soon change to some extent if rumours that a woman is to take over as head of the B.B.C.are true? But what exactly will that do? Will it really mean any form of true equality, or will it just be a " We shall overcome" role reversal? The battle of the sexes isn't exactly a new concept but you'd think by now it would have declared a peace pact somewhere.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests