The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed May 28, 2014 10:48 am

I don't think you understand. I want everything and everybody to be and act the same, apart from my life being better. So same job, same house, same prices. But I want to pay less tax. Just me. Nobody else.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Sun Jun 01, 2014 6:56 am

How to reach the top as a woman in Politics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Be one of these :mrgreen:

Image

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Sun Jun 01, 2014 8:52 am

So why do UKIP not do very well in London according to BWFCi

Maybe this little insight as to how 'democratic Londoners' run their elections might help.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... ondon.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I suspect this goes on in some other wards too, maybe not to this extent but it goes on.

Make a place multinational and watch corruption run rife!

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24859
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:48 am

Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38948
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:50 am

Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
Agreed. It is totally depressing.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34838
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:57 am

Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
I always look forwards to the Sunday morning random spoutings. It can only strengthen the opposition. I think we should publish it wider.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:13 am

I'm sure John Prescott only got his candidacy because he's a bit of eye candy for the ladies. But that's modern politics for you, eh?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 01, 2014 12:39 pm

Legal types, yes, you two. Is this even remotely plausible/actionable? What 'right' does anyone have to tv airtime? :conf:

Ukip ‘will sue’ if Nigel Farage is not given equal air time to Labour and Conservatives in TV coverage building up to 2015 general election

Full article in The Independent, here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 67522.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:02 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:Legal types, yes, you two. Is this even remotely plausible/actionable? What 'right' does anyone have to tv airtime? :conf:

Ukip ‘will sue’ if Nigel Farage is not given equal air time to Labour and Conservatives in TV coverage building up to 2015 general election

Full article in The Independent, here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 67522.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
there's usually some kind of coverage agreement - but I thought it wa proportionate to the number of MPs you have.. he hasn't got any... i may be wrong... (not about him not having any!)

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:50 pm

thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Legal types, yes, you two. Is this even remotely plausible/actionable? What 'right' does anyone have to tv airtime? :conf:

Ukip ‘will sue’ if Nigel Farage is not given equal air time to Labour and Conservatives in TV coverage building up to 2015 general election

Full article in The Independent, here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 67522.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
there's usually some kind of coverage agreement - but I thought it wa proportionate to the number of MPs you have.. he hasn't got any... i may be wrong... (not about him not having any!)
Ah right, cheers. I've not heard of that. And anyway, hasn't he spent more time on QT than anyone bar Dimbleby, or is that just a myth?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34838
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:19 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Legal types, yes, you two. Is this even remotely plausible/actionable? What 'right' does anyone have to tv airtime? :conf:

Ukip ‘will sue’ if Nigel Farage is not given equal air time to Labour and Conservatives in TV coverage building up to 2015 general election

Full article in The Independent, here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 67522.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
there's usually some kind of coverage agreement - but I thought it wa proportionate to the number of MPs you have.. he hasn't got any... i may be wrong... (not about him not having any!)
Ah right, cheers. I've not heard of that. And anyway, hasn't he spent more time on QT than anyone bar Dimbleby, or is that just a myth?
Dunno about the last bit, but the first bit is covered under Codes of Conduct by the Broadcasters - the Representation of the People Act, basically instructs Broadcasters to draw up a Code of Conduct. So BBC and ITC both have them (+some Welsh and Scottish National Channels).

ITC's Code of Conduct says "There is no expectation that the time devoted to all parties and candidates in an election will be equal"..."Licensees must exercise their judgement, based on factors such as significant levels of previous electoral support, evidence of significant current support, and the number of candidates being fielded by a party. Due weight should be given to coverage of major parties (these are defined in relation to the UK in Section 4.3(i) below). However, smaller parties and independent candidates may also be among those with significant views and perspectives, to which appropriate coverage may need to be given."

Major Parties are currently defined as Cons, Lab, Lib Dems, which I'm sure they'll easily contend is appropriate for a General Election, given UKIP polled less then 1m votes - nearly 6m less than the Lib Dems at the last General Election, and not quite double the BNP.

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Puskas » Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:17 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
Agreed. It is totally depressing.
Just add him to your block/ignore list, or whatever it's called.

Let's face it, his posts consist of cliched, vacuous shite and occasionally a list of out-of-context, unsourced quotes, which he seems to view as evicence.

Unless you particularly enjoy laughing at stupid people, you won't miss anything.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:24 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:Legal types, yes, you two. Is this even remotely plausible/actionable? What 'right' does anyone have to tv airtime? :conf:

Ukip ‘will sue’ if Nigel Farage is not given equal air time to Labour and Conservatives in TV coverage building up to 2015 general election

Full article in The Independent, here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 67522.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
there's usually some kind of coverage agreement - but I thought it wa proportionate to the number of MPs you have.. he hasn't got any... i may be wrong... (not about him not having any!)
Ah right, cheers. I've not heard of that. And anyway, hasn't he spent more time on QT than anyone bar Dimbleby, or is that just a myth?
A Code of Conduct is an in-house document and not a law. It would not stop someone suing and the case would probably be heard since Farage enjoys some significant amount of support. However, his chance of winning damages would be more remote than him becoming Prime Minister one day.

Dunno about the last bit, but the first bit is covered under Codes of Conduct by the Broadcasters - the Representation of the People Act, basically instructs Broadcasters to draw up a Code of Conduct. So BBC and ITC both have them (+some Welsh and Scottish National Channels).

ITC's Code of Conduct says "There is no expectation that the time devoted to all parties and candidates in an election will be equal"..."Licensees must exercise their judgement, based on factors such as significant levels of previous electoral support, evidence of significant current support, and the number of candidates being fielded by a party. Due weight should be given to coverage of major parties (these are defined in relation to the UK in Section 4.3(i) below). However, smaller parties and independent candidates may also be among those with significant views and perspectives, to which appropriate coverage may need to be given."

Major Parties are currently defined as Cons, Lab, Lib Dems, which I'm sure they'll easily contend is appropriate for a General Election, given UKIP polled less then 1m votes - nearly 6m less than the Lib Dems at the last General Election, and not quite double the BNP.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by William the White » Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:44 pm

Hoboh wrote:How to reach the top as a woman in Politics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Be one of these :mrgreen:

Image
Has anyone got a pic of hoboh? Bet he's a knockout. Come on, post...

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:26 am

Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
It appears the only bollocks you've failed to sprout were between your legs!

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:33 am

Puskas wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
Agreed. It is totally depressing.
Just add him to your block/ignore list, or whatever it's called.

Let's face it, his posts consist of cliched, vacuous shite and occasionally a list of out-of-context, unsourced quotes, which he seems to view as evicence.

Unless you particularly enjoy laughing at stupid people, you won't miss anything.
You, a feckin' ghost on here calling anyone stupid!! Feck off to mainland Europe and live with the bent bastards if you like them so much, just don't drag the rest of us down to your level of ambition.
Wait till they start a war or mass civil unrest with someone because they will rub somebody up the wrong way sooner or later, don't start crying then.
When its pointless voting or they start to deny you the right because its not in their interests remember you were one of the appeasers.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:35 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
Agreed. It is totally depressing.
You get depressed by my posts :roll: There are a few posters missing maybe they hung themselves after reading your Freedman love ins!

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:36 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Appears to explain why Labour didn't do as well to me.

UKIP didn't do very well because they didn't stand.

Your constant misogyny and casual racism is getting a bit tiresome btw, give it a rest.
I always look forwards to the Sunday morning random spoutings. It can only strengthen the opposition. I think we should publish it wider.
Please do :mrgreen:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:36 am

William the White wrote:
Hoboh wrote:How to reach the top as a woman in Politics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Be one of these :mrgreen:

Image
Has anyone got a pic of hoboh? Bet he's a knockout. Come on, post...
:D

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Fri Jun 13, 2014 6:10 pm

three shameless wankers...

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests