creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:04 pm

God we miss Swann.....

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jun 14, 2014 4:18 pm

Been out; just got back. All those runs we got don't look quite so frightening now. Could do with a wicket. Hard going for the bowlers from the looks of it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:30 pm

wahayyyyy!!

Sangakkara c Prior b Moeen 147

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by bobo the clown » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:05 pm

thebish wrote:wahayyyyy!!

Sangakkara c Prior b Moeen 147
Yay !! What a loser. :roll:
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:52 pm

We'll get those three wickets early on tomorrow, knock up a decent score (no thanks to Cook), they'll try to pad out for the draw and we'll have 'em, nay bother. En-ger-land etc. :oyea:
May the bridges I burn light your way

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Puskas » Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:36 am

And Jimmy bowls Herath.

And an interesting statistic I've just read - the most common dismissal involving a wicketkeeper in England's test history yesterday became c. Prior b. Anderson (61 occurrences), overtaking the 60 c. Taylor b. Botham.

So there you go
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 15, 2014 1:59 pm

fecking shit again, Cook. :roll:
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:51 pm

Not long back Cooke and Trott were kings.......now? Even the reliable Bell's gone.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:09 pm

98-4 and Root's gone.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:15 pm

Oh dear, Five down. Plan B not working. On to Plan C...
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Jun 15, 2014 5:14 pm

Balance 48 and Jordan 24 showing our leaders how it's done (thankfully).
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Puskas » Sun Jun 15, 2014 5:42 pm

It's alright.

A lead of over 300 - Sri Lanka won't make that much on the last day.

Question is - when to declare...?
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:36 pm

267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:38 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
I might have put them in for the last 45 mins to try for a couple of quick wickets.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:15 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
I might have put them in for the last 45 mins to try for a couple of quick wickets.
Exactly that. Never mind this 'let's hang on til so-and-so gets his ton'. Team game. We could've had their openers under pressure.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:18 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
I might have put them in for the last 45 mins to try for a couple of quick wickets.
Exactly that. Never mind this 'let's hang on til so-and-so gets his ton'. Team game. We could've had their openers under pressure.
On a flat track with no front line spinner to face we don't have that luxury. Sri Lanka are well capable of knocking 300 plus if given a day plus.....

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:32 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
I might have put them in for the last 45 mins to try for a couple of quick wickets.
Exactly that. Never mind this 'let's hang on til so-and-so gets his ton'. Team game. We could've had their openers under pressure.
On a flat track with no front line spinner to face we don't have that luxury. Sri Lanka are well capable of knocking 300 plus if given a day plus.....
I've been up at my folks. Did we score 89 in the last 45 minutes then?
May the bridges I burn light your way

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by thebish » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:27 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:267-8 at stumps. We lead by 389 and Balance ended the day with a magnificent 104 not out.
I might have put them in for the last 45 mins to try for a couple of quick wickets.
I suspect that could very easily have backfired...

with so many fewer runs we would not have been able to attack so easily with catchers in place so long - we'd have had to have an eye on runs and spread the field. The Sri Lankan top order are quyite capable of knocking off under 300 in over a day...

we have 90 overs - so two new ball spells... i don't think Cook has done much wrong here.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:30 pm

thebish wrote: i don't think Cook has done much wrong here.
Well, I'll start with his defensive field. Where are the slips?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38826
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sun Jun 15, 2014 11:02 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
thebish wrote: i don't think Cook has done much wrong here.
Well, I'll start with his defensive field. Where are the slips?
Share your doubts about Cook as a captain and the overly defensive field settings at times.

I'm still not convinced sticking em in was necessarily right, we have a fairly pedestrian bowling line up now if it isn't swinging and once the shine is off the ball, without Swann we are pretty toothless. We scored 340 odd on the first day did we not? So Sri Lanka definitely could chase down 350 in a day with a bit more. Ok not necessarily easily but still would be a big risk and probably not one on balance we need to take.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests